Enzymatic Debridement in Burns Patients: A Comparison to Standard of Care
1 other identifier
interventional
182
10 countries
17
Brief Summary
Burns represent one of the most severe and dreaded traumas. Burned and traumatized tissue is known as eschar. The dead eschar, if not removed, often becomes heavily contaminated and is the source of local and/or systemic infection or sepsis. The local inflammation and infection destroy healthy surrounding tissues and extends the original damage. In order to prevent these complications, and in order to minimize the risk of infection, it is imperative to evaluate the burn and remove all of the offending eschar at the earliest possible opportunity. This removal of dead tissue is termed "debridement". The most direct debridement method for eschar removal is surgery. Traditional, conservative non-surgical debridement is a lengthy process which often involves many complications. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and enzymatic debriding efficacy of Debrase Gel Dressing (DGD) in hospitalized patients with deep partial thickness and/or full thickness thermal burns and to compare DGD to standard of care (SOC).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Dec 2005
Typical duration for phase_3
17 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 10, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 11, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2010
CompletedMay 10, 2011
July 1, 2009
3.8 years
May 10, 2006
May 8, 2011
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Co-primary: % treated wound excised (by tangential/minor/Versajet excision) or dermabrasion, in first surgery, of deep partial wounds
Surgical excision/dermabrasion performed as initial debridement (surgical SOC group) or as first post-debridement procedure (DGD or non-surgical SOC groups)
Co-primary: % treated wound autografted of deep partial wounds
Post-debridement autografts
Secondary Outcomes (4)
% treated wound excised (by tangential/minor/Versajet excision) or dermabrasion, in first surgery, for all wounds
As for primary endpoint
Time to complete wound closure
% epithelialization assessed post-debridement at weekly intervals until all a patient's wounds closed
Timely eschar removal
Debridement procedures
Blood loss
Throughout study
Study Arms (2)
DGD
EXPERIMENTALSOC
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Lyophilized, sterile mixture of proteolyzed enzymes; mixed with gel,for topical application.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males and females between 4 years to 55 years of age,
- Thermal burns caused by fire/flame, scalds or contact,
- Deep partial thickness (mixed deep dermal) and/or full thickness (3°) burn wounds ≥ 5% and ≤ 30% Total Body Surface Area (TBSA); all these wounds must receive study treatment,
- At least one wound of ≥ 2% TBSA deep partial thickness and/or full thickness burn,
- Total burn wounds ≤ 30% TBSA,
- Signed written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Deep partial thickness and/or full thickness facial burn wounds, \> 0.5% TBSA; study treatment of facial burns is not allowed,
- Study treatment of perineal and/or genital burns (A patient with these wounds may be enrolled but the wounds may not be designated as target wounds),
- Circumferential anterior/posterior trunk full thickness fire/flame burns, \> 15% TBSA, (Circumferential is defined as encircling ≥ 80% of the trunk circumference.)
- Pre-enrollment escharotomy,
- Heavily contaminated burns or pre-existing infections,
- Signs that may indicate smoke inhalation,
- General condition of patient would contraindicate surgery,
- Pregnant women (positive pregnancy test) or nursing mothers,
- Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus (HbA1c\>9%),
- Cardio-pulmonary disease (MI within 4 weeks prior to injury, pulmonary hypertension, COPD or pre-existing oxygen-dependent pulmonary diseases),
- Pre-existing diseases which interfere with circulation (PVD, edema, lymphedema, surgery to the regional lymph nodes, obesity, varicose veins),
- Immediate life threatening conditions (such as immuno-compromising diseases, life threatening trauma, severe pre-existing coagulation disorder, cardiovascular, liver or neoplastic disease),
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- MediWound Ltdlead
Study Sites (17)
Royal Hospital Perth
Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Pronto Socorro para Queimaduras de Goiania
Goiânia, Brazil
Hospital do Servidor Publico do Estado de Sao Paulo
São Paulo, Brazil
Centre Hospitalier Regional et Universitaire de Marseille, Service de Chirurgie Plastique Reparatrice et Esthetique
Marseille, 13005, France
Center Des Brules Hopital Cochin
Paris, F-75014, France
Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin Burn Center
Berlin, Germany
BG - Unfallklinik Ludwigshafen
Ludwigshafen, Germany
Klinikum Mannheim Universtatsklinikum
Mannheim, Germany
Soroka University Medical Center
Beersheba, Israel
Centro Grandi Ustionati
Cesena, 47023, Italy
Direttore U.O. Chirurgia Plastica e Centro Ustioni Ospedale Civico
Palermo, 90127, Italy
Wojskowy Instytut Medyczny
Warsaw, Poland
Emergency Clinic Hospital "Bagdazar-Arsenie"
Bucharest, Romania
Center for Burns & Reconstructive Surgery, University Hopsital Bratislava
Bratislava, 82107, Slovakia
Clinic of Burns and Reconstructive Surgery Hospital Kosice
Kosice-Saca, 04015, Slovakia
Queen Victoria Hospital
East Grinstead, RH19 3DZ, United Kingdom
The Burn Center Pinderfields Hospital
Wakefield, WF1 4EE, United Kingdom
Related Publications (3)
Rosenberg L, Lapid O, Bogdanov-Berezovsky A, Glesinger R, Krieger Y, Silberstein E, Sagi A, Judkins K, Singer AJ. Safety and efficacy of a proteolytic enzyme for enzymatic burn debridement: a preliminary report. Burns. 2004 Dec;30(8):843-50. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2004.04.010.
PMID: 15555800BACKGROUNDSinha S, Gabriel VA, Arora RK, Shin W, Scott J, Bharadia SK, Verly M, Rahmani WM, Nickerson DA, Fraulin FO, Chatterjee P, Ahuja RB, Biernaskie JA. Interventions for postburn pruritus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 5;6(6):CD013468. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013468.pub2.
PMID: 38837237DERIVEDRosenberg L, Krieger Y, Bogdanov-Berezovski A, Silberstein E, Shoham Y, Singer AJ. A novel rapid and selective enzymatic debridement agent for burn wound management: a multi-center RCT. Burns. 2014 May;40(3):466-74. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
PMID: 24074719DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Lior Rosenberg, MD
MediWound Ltd
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 10, 2006
First Posted
May 11, 2006
Study Start
December 1, 2005
Primary Completion
October 1, 2009
Study Completion
February 1, 2010
Last Updated
May 10, 2011
Record last verified: 2009-07