NCT00315796

Brief Summary

Pain is a common and difficult problem for patients with cancer. It has been reported that over 80% of cancer patients suffer from pain. Much of this pain is iatrogenic and related to procedures. Dr. Grossman recently demonstrated that most patients undergoing bone marrow biopsy have poor pain control during the procedure. Treatment of pain is almost entirely with analgesic medications, principally opioids. These medications have numerous undesirable effects such as sedation, confusion, hypotension and constipation that limit their efficacy and utility. Drs. Diette, Lechtzin, Rubin and colleagues recently demonstrated that use of nature sights and sounds (NSS), a simple, safe, and inexpensive intervention, decreases pain during fiberoptic bronchoscopy, a procedure commonly performed to diagnose cancer and to detect pulmonary complications of cancer therapy. Patients were randomly assigned to either standard care with intravenous narcotics and benzodiazepines or standard care coupled with view of a nature scene and use of nature sounds before, during, and after bronchoscopy. The group assigned to the NSS reported significantly better pain control than the control group. While these findings are novel and exciting, they raised several new questions that suggest logical extensions of this work. It is not known whether this intervention can be applied to patients in other settings, nor is it known whether comparison to standard care is an appropriate control group. Further, the mechanism of action of NSS needs to be determined. NSS may simply be a form of distraction therapy but it may have other properties. The theory of biophilia proposes there are specific elements in nature imagery that exert beneficial health effects. Because NSS appears to be a promising and safe intervention for the treatment of pain, these investigators plan to perform a controlled clinical trial in cancer patients undergoing invasive procedures. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of three arms, standard care, NSS, and a non-nature based distraction technique. We will study the efficacy of NSS for the management of procedure-related pain in oncology patients. The findings will provide necessary background information to develop more definitive studies of NSS that should be competitive for external funding. This exciting study will help develop a harmless, inexpensive method to treat pain in cancer patients, that may complement or replace analgesic medications.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3 cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2004

Shorter than P25 for phase_3 cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2004

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2005

Completed
11 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 17, 2006

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 19, 2006

Completed
Last Updated

April 1, 2015

Status Verified

January 1, 2005

First QC Date

April 17, 2006

Last Update Submit

March 31, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

Mind-Body InterventionDistractionBiophilicCancerpainBedscapesproceduresbone marrow aspiratebone marrow biopsy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain ratings: Hopkins Pain Rating Instrument

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Affective Distress: Profile of Moods States

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of cancer
  • Age\>18
  • Outpatient in the Weinberg Cancer Pavilion
  • Capable of providing informed consent
  • Undergoing bone marrow aspirate/biopsy

You may not qualify if:

  • Visual impairment precluding use of nature scenes or city skyline photo
  • Hearing impairment precluding use of compact discs or nature sounds
  • Altered mental status (mental status score \<25)
  • Infection requiring contact isolation
  • Language barrier that would limit ability to answer English language questionnaires
  • Karnofsky performance score below 60
  • Patients receiving conscious sedation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Johns Hopkins Hospital

Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Lechtzin N, Busse AM, Smith MT, Grossman S, Nesbit S, Diette GB. A randomized trial of nature scenery and sounds versus urban scenery and sounds to reduce pain in adults undergoing bone marrow aspirate and biopsy. J Altern Complement Med. 2010 Sep;16(9):965-72. doi: 10.1089/acm.2009.0531.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

NeoplasmsPain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Noah Lechtzin, MD, MHS

    Johns Hopkins University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 17, 2006

First Posted

April 19, 2006

Study Start

August 1, 2004

Study Completion

June 1, 2005

Last Updated

April 1, 2015

Record last verified: 2005-01

Locations