NCT00310804

Brief Summary

The present study aims to evaluate safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of three lots of Chiron's cell-derived subunit influenza vaccine in healthy adult subjects as compared to a conventional egg-derived control vaccine licensed in Europe.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2005

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2005

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2005

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2006

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 3, 2006

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 5, 2006

Completed
6.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 18, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

August 15, 2019

Status Verified

August 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

April 3, 2006

Results QC Date

December 11, 2012

Last Update Submit

August 2, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

InfluenzaFluCell-DerivedEgg-DerivedHealthy AdultsSafetyImmunogenicityVaccination

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Geometric Mean Titers After One Dose of Cell Culture-derived or the Egg-derived Influenza Vaccine in Adult Subjects

    The haemagglutinin Inhibition (HI) antibody titer response following 1. one dose of cTIV for each of the three lots separately and 2. one dose of cTIV (combined) compared to TIV is reported as Geometric mean titers (GMTs). The HI GMTs were evaluated using egg-derived antigen assay.

    Day 22 postvaccination

  • Geometric Mean Ratios After One Dose of Cell Culture-derived or the Egg-derived Influenza Vaccine in Adult Subjects

    Immunogenicity was assessed in terms of Geometric Mean Ratio (GMR) following 1. one dose of cTIV for each of the three vaccine lots separately and 2. for one dose of cTIV (combined) compared to TIV, according to the CHMP criterion. The European licensure (CHMP) criterion is met if the mean geometric increase (GMR, day 22/day 1) in HI antibody titer is \>2.5.

    Day 22 postvaccination

  • Percentage of Subjects With HI Titers ≥40

    Immunogenicity was assessed in terms of percentage of adult subjects achieving HI titers ≥40, after 1. one dose of cTIV for each of the three vaccine lots separately and 2. for one dose of cTIV (combined) compared to TIV, according to the CHMP criterion. European Licensure (CHMP) criterion is met if the percentage of subjects achieving HI titers ≥40 is \>70%.

    Day 22 postvaccination

  • Percentage of Subjects With Seroconversion or Significant Increase in HI Antibody Titers After One Dose of Either Cell-derived or Egg-derived Subunit Trivalent Influenza Vaccine

    Immunogenicity was assessed in terms of percentage of adult subjects showing seroconversion or significant increase in HI antibody titers after 1. one dose of cTIV for each of the three vaccine lots separately and 2. one dose of cTIV (combined) compared to TIV, according to the CHMP criterion. European Licensure (CHMP) criterion is met if the percentage of subjects achieving seroconversion or significant increase is \>40%. As per European Licensure (CHMP) criterion seroconversion is defined as percentage of subjects with a prevaccination HI titer \<10 to a postvaccination titer ≥40; whereas, significant increase is defined as HI titer ≥10 prevaccination and ≥4-fold Hi titer increase post-vaccination.

    Day 22 postvaccination

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Number of Subjects Reporting Solicited Adverse Events After One Dose of Cell Culture-derived or the Egg-derived Influenza Vaccine.

    Day 1 to Day 7 postvaccination

  • Safety Data of Subjects Upto Six Months After One Dose of Cell Culture Derived or Egg-derived Influenza Vaccine

    Day 1 - Day 181 postvaccination

Study Arms (4)

cTIV_lot 1

EXPERIMENTAL
Biological: Cell-Derived Trivalent Subunit Influenza Vaccine Lot 1 (cTIV)

cTIV_lot 2

EXPERIMENTAL
Biological: Cell-Derived Trivalent Subunit Influenza Vaccine Lot 2 (cTIV)

cTIV_lot 3

EXPERIMENTAL
Biological: Cell-Derived Trivalent Subunit Influenza Vaccine Lot 3 (cTIV)

TIV group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Biological: Egg-Derived Trivalent Subunit Influenza Vaccine (TIV)

Interventions

One single 0.5ml intramuscular injection of Cell Derived Trivalent Subunit Influenza Vaccine (cTIV) from Lot 1

cTIV_lot 1

One single 0.5ml intramuscular injection of Cell Derived Trivalent Subunit Influenza Vaccine (cTIV) from Lot 2

cTIV_lot 2

One single 0.5ml intramuscular injection of Cell Derived Trivalent Subunit Influenza Vaccine (cTIV) from Lot 3

cTIV_lot 3

One single 0.5ml intramuscular injection of Egg Derived Trivalent Subunit Influenza Vaccine (TIV).

TIV group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • to \<61 years of age
  • mentally competent to understand the nature, the scope and the consequences of the study
  • able and willing to give written informed consent prior to study entry
  • in good health as determined by:
  • medical history,
  • physical examination,
  • clinical judgment of the Investigator.

You may not qualify if:

  • unwilling or unable to give written informed consent to participate in the study
  • participation in another clinical trial of an investigational agent within 90 days prior to Visit 1 and throughout the entire study
  • currently experiencing an acute infectious disease
  • any serious disease, such as, for example:
  • cancer,
  • autoimmune disease (including rheumatoid arthritis),
  • advanced arteriosclerotic disease or complicated diabetes mellitus,
  • chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requiring oxygen therapy,
  • acute or progressive hepatic disease,
  • acute or progressive renal disease,
  • congestive heart failure
  • surgery planned during the study period
  • bleeding diathesis
  • history of hypersensitivity to any component of the study medication or chemically related substances
  • history of any anaphylaxis, serious vaccine reactions, or allergy to any of the vaccine component
  • +14 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

2nd Department of Internal Diseases, Panevezys Hospital,

Panevezys, Lithuania

Location

Dept. Infectious Diseases and Microbiology of Vilnius University

Vilnius, Lithuania

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Ambrozaitis A, Groth N, Bugarini R, Sparacio V, Podda A, Lattanzi M. A novel mammalian cell-culture technique for consistent production of a well-tolerated and immunogenic trivalent subunit influenza vaccine. Vaccine. 2009 Oct 9;27(43):6022-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.07.083. Epub 2009 Aug 8.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Influenza, Human

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiratory Tract InfectionsInfectionsOrthomyxoviridae InfectionsRNA Virus InfectionsVirus DiseasesRespiratory Tract Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

Because of potential issues related to Good Clinical Practice (GCP), data from one of the sites were not used in the analyses.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Posting Director
Organization
Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics

Study Officials

  • Novartis Vaccines

    Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics

    STUDY CHAIR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
GT60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2006

First Posted

April 5, 2006

Study Start

September 1, 2005

Primary Completion

October 1, 2005

Study Completion

April 1, 2006

Last Updated

August 15, 2019

Results First Posted

January 18, 2013

Record last verified: 2019-08

Locations