Study Comparing Outcomes for Patients With Treatment Resistant Depression Who Receive VNS Therapy at Different Doses
Randomized Comparison of Outcomes in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression Who Receive VNS Therapy Administered at Different Amounts of Electrical Charge
1 other identifier
interventional
331
1 country
26
Brief Summary
This is a postmarket medical device study. The objective of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy administered at different amounts of electrical charge for the treatment of patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4 depression
Started Jan 2006
Typical duration for phase_4 depression
26 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 20, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 22, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 25, 2013
CompletedJanuary 7, 2014
December 1, 2013
4.1 years
March 20, 2006
January 6, 2011
December 6, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (IDS-C) Mean Change From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population).
The 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-C/SR) (Rush et al. 1986, 1996) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Scale range minimum = 0 / maximum = 84. Higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.
From Baseline to Study Week 22
Secondary Outcomes (35)
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (IDS-C) Percent Responders From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population).
From baseline to Study Week 22
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (IDS-C) Percent Remitters From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population).
From baseline to Study Week 22
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (IDS-C) Percent Responders From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population).
From baseline to Study Week 50
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (IDS-C) Percent Sustained Responders at Study Week 50 (ITT Population).
From baseline to Study Week 50
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (IDS-C) Percent Remitters From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population).
From baseline to Study Week 50
- +30 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Low Dose
OTHERMedium Dose
OTHERHigh Dose
OTHERInterventions
Received output current of 0.25 milliamps (mA)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient has a diagnosis of chronic or recurrent depression and is currently experiencing a major depressive episode.
- Patient has not had an adequate response to four or more adequate antidepressant treatments from at least two different antidepressant treatment categories.
- Patient has (in the investigator's judgment) sufficient impairment from his/her depression and/or depression treatment that the potential benefits/risks of VNS Therapy are warranted.
- Patient must currently be receiving at least one antidepressant treatment; the patient must be receiving all current antidepressant treatments in a stable regimen.
- If the patient has a current diagnosis of bipolar disorder, the patient must be receiving a mood stabilizer.
- Patient must be 18 years of age or older and of legal age of consent.
- Patient must be able to complete the evaluations specified in the study procedures flow chart.
- Patient must provide written informed consent and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) authorization.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient has had a bilateral or left cervical vagotomy.
- Patient currently uses, or is expected to use during the study, short-wave diathermy, microwave diathermy, or therapeutic ultrasound diathermy.
- A VNS Therapy System implant would pose an unacceptable surgical or medical risk for the patient.
- Patient is expected to require full body magnetic resonance imaging during the clinical study.
- Patient is acutely suicidal.
- Patient has a history of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or other psychotic disorder or a current major depressive episode that includes psychotic features (commonly referred to as psychotic depression).
- Patient has a history of rapid cycling bipolar disorder or a current diagnosis of bipolar disorder mixed phase.
- Patient has a history of borderline personality disorder.
- Patient has a history of drug or alcohol dependence within the 12 months prior to the baseline visit or currently takes a narcotic drug five or more days per week.
- Patient is currently enrolled in another investigational study.
- Patient has had a prior VNS Therapy System implant.
- Note: Some IRBs may require additional conditions for enrollment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cyberonics, Inc.lead
Study Sites (26)
University of Arizona
Tucson, Arizona, 85724, United States
Sutter Institute for Medical Research
Sacramento, California, 95816, United States
Northwest Behavioral Research Center
Marietta, Georgia, 30060, United States
Evanston Northwestern Hospital
Evanston, Illinois, 60201, United States
Clinical Research Institute
Wichita, Kansas, 67211, United States
Brentwood Research Institute
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71101, United States
Sheppard Pratt Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21204, United States
Pharmasite Research Inc.
Baltimore, Maryland, 21208, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Charlestown, Massachusetts, 02129, United States
Psychiatric Recovery
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55114, United States
St. Louis University
St Louis, Missouri, 63104, United States
Dent Neurologic Institute
Amherst, New York, 14226, United States
Eastside Comprehensive Medical Center
New York, New York, 10021, United States
New York State Psychiatric Institute
New York, New York, 10032, United States
SUNY Upstate Medical University
Syracuse, New York, 13210, United States
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033, United States
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
Butler Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02906, United States
Community Clinical Research, Inc.
Austin, Texas, 78756, United States
UT Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75235-8898, United States
Claghorn-Lesem Research Clinic, LTD
Houston, Texas, 77401, United States
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132-2502, United States
Center for Anxiety and Depression
Mercer Island, Washington, 98040, United States
Related Publications (7)
Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Koretz D, Merikangas KR, Rush AJ, Walters EE, Wang PS; National Comorbidity Survey Replication. The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). JAMA. 2003 Jun 18;289(23):3095-105. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.23.3095.
PMID: 12813115BACKGROUNDMurray CJ, Lopez AD. Evidence-based health policy--lessons from the Global Burden of Disease Study. Science. 1996 Nov 1;274(5288):740-3. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5288.740. No abstract available.
PMID: 8966556BACKGROUNDGeddes LA, Baker LE: Principles of Applied Biomedical Instrumentation, third edition. New York; John Wiley & Sons, 1989; 458-461.
BACKGROUNDRush AJ, Sackeim HA, Marangell LB, George MS, Brannan SK, Davis SM, Lavori P, Howland R, Kling MA, Rittberg B, Carpenter L, Ninan P, Moreno F, Schwartz T, Conway C, Burke M, Barry JJ. Effects of 12 months of vagus nerve stimulation in treatment-resistant depression: a naturalistic study. Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Sep 1;58(5):355-63. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.05.024.
PMID: 16139581BACKGROUNDGeorge MS, Rush AJ, Marangell LB, Sackeim HA, Brannan SK, Davis SM, Howland R, Kling MA, Moreno F, Rittberg B, Dunner D, Schwartz T, Carpenter L, Burke M, Ninan P, Goodnick P. A one-year comparison of vagus nerve stimulation with treatment as usual for treatment-resistant depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Sep 1;58(5):364-73. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.07.028.
PMID: 16139582BACKGROUNDRush AJ, Marangell LB, Sackeim HA, George MS, Brannan SK, Davis SM, Howland R, Kling MA, Rittberg BR, Burke WJ, Rapaport MH, Zajecka J, Nierenberg AA, Husain MM, Ginsberg D, Cooke RG. Vagus nerve stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a randomized, controlled acute phase trial. Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Sep 1;58(5):347-54. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.05.025.
PMID: 16139580BACKGROUNDAaronson ST, Carpenter LL, Conway CR, Reimherr FW, Lisanby SH, Schwartz TL, Moreno FA, Dunner DL, Lesem MD, Thompson PM, Husain M, Vine CJ, Banov MD, Bernstein LP, Lehman RB, Brannon GE, Keepers GA, O'Reardon JP, Rudolph RL, Bunker M. Vagus nerve stimulation therapy randomized to different amounts of electrical charge for treatment-resistant depression: acute and chronic effects. Brain Stimul. 2013 Jul;6(4):631-40. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2012.09.013. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
PMID: 23122916RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Mark Bunker Sr. Director, Global Medical Affairs
- Organization
- Cyberonics Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mark Bunker, PharmD
Cyberonics, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 20, 2006
First Posted
March 22, 2006
Study Start
January 1, 2006
Primary Completion
February 1, 2010
Study Completion
February 1, 2010
Last Updated
January 7, 2014
Results First Posted
February 25, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-12