NCT00304200

Brief Summary

This study is designed to evaluate the safety and appropriate dose of the combination of Temodar and Sutent as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic malignant melanoma (Phase 1). Once the safety and appropriate dose is determined, additional patients will be studied at that dose to determine if there is clinical benefit as determined by the primary end-point of progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months and additional secondary endpoints (Phase II).

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
7

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2006

Typical duration for phase_1

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2006

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 12, 2006

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 17, 2006

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2007

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2009

Completed
Last Updated

February 5, 2009

Status Verified

February 1, 2009

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

March 12, 2006

Last Update Submit

February 3, 2009

Conditions

Keywords

Metastatic Malignant Melanoma

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Safety and tolerability of this combination

    March 2006 through October 2007

  • Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of this combination

    March 2006 through October 2007

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months

    March 2006 through October 2007

  • Progression-free survival (PFS)

    March 2006 through October 2007

  • Overall survival (OS)

    October 2006 through January 2009

  • Objective Response Rate (RR)in patients with measurable lesions

    March 2006 through October 2007

  • Duration of Objective Response in patients with measurable lesions

    March 2006 through October 2007

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Single arm, Open Label

EXPERIMENTAL

Single arm, Open Label Temodar and Sutent

Drug: Temozolomide and SU11248

Interventions

First Cohort: Temozolomide 100 mg/m2 orally week 1 and week 3 of a 28-day cycle; SU11248, 25 mg/day orally on weeks 2, 3, and 4 or a 28 day cycle.

Also known as: Temozolomide is also known as Temodar, SU11248 is also known as Sutent
Single arm, Open Label

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with histologically confirmed, (surgically incurable or unresectable)stage IV metastatic malignant melanoma.
  • Patients must not have received any prior cytokine or chemotherapy for stage IV disease.
  • ECOG performance status of 0-1.
  • Age greater than or equal to 18 years.
  • Adequate hematologic, renal and liver function as defined by laboratory values performed within 28 days prior to initiation of dosing.
  • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than or equal to 1500/uL
  • Platelet count greater than or equal to 100,000/uL
  • Hemoglobin greater than or equal to 10.0 g/dL
  • Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 upper limit of laboratory normal
  • Total serum bilirubin less than or equal to1.5 times upper limit of laboratory normal
  • LDH less than or equal to 2 times upper limit of laboratory normal
  • Serum aspartate transaminase (ASAT/SGOT) or serum alanine transaminase (ALAT/SGPT) ≤ 2.5 times upper limit of laboratory normal, and ≤ 5 times upper limit of laboratory normal in cases of liver metastasis
  • Patients must have recovered from effects of major surgery.
  • Women of childbearing potential should be using an effective method of contraception. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative urine or serum pregnancy test up to 28 days prior to commencement of dosing and be practicing medically approved contraceptive precautions for at least 6 months after completion of treatment as directed by their physician.
  • Men should use an effective method of contraception during treatment and for at least 6 months after completion of treatment as directed by their physician.
  • +2 more criteria

You may not qualify if:

  • Major surgery or radiation therapy within 4 weeks of starting the study treatment.
  • Evidence of brain metastases.
  • NCI CTCAE Version 3.0 grade 3 hemorrhage within 4 weeks of starting the study treatment.
  • History of or known spinal cord compression, or carcinomatous meningitis, or evidence of symptomatic brain or leptomeningeal disease on screening CT or MRI scan.
  • Any of the following within the 6 months prior to study drug administration: myocardial infarction, severe/unstable angina, coronary/peripheral artery bypass graft, symptomatic congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack, or pulmonary embolism.
  • Ongoing cardiac dysrhythmias of NCI CTCAE Version 3.0 grade equal to or greater than 2.
  • Prolonged QTc interval on baseline EKG.
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (\>150/100 mm Hg despite optimal medical therapy).
  • Pre-existing thyroid abnormality with thyroid function that cannot be maintained in the normal range with medication.
  • Known active infection.
  • Concurrent treatment on another clinical trial. Supportive care trials or non-treatment trials, e.g. QOL, are allowed.
  • Treatment with drugs with dysrhythmic potential including terfenadine, quinidine, procainamide, disopyramide, sotalol, probucol, bepridil, haloperidol, risperidone, and/or indapamide.
  • Other severe acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with study participation or study drug administration, or may interfere with the interpretation of study results, and in the judgment of the investigator would make the subject inappropriate for entry into this study.
  • Frequent vomiting or medical condition which could interfere with oral medication intake (e.g. partial bowel obstruction).
  • Previous cancer (unless a DRS interval of at least 5 years) or concurrent malignancies at other sites with the exception of surgically cured carcinoma in-situ of the cervix and basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin.
  • +2 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Northern California Melanoma Center

San Francisco, California, 94109, United States

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Middleton MR, Grob JJ, Aaronson N, Fierlbeck G, Tilgen W, Seiter S, Gore M, Aamdal S, Cebon J, Coates A, Dreno B, Henz M, Schadendorf D, Kapp A, Weiss J, Fraass U, Statkevich P, Muller M, Thatcher N. Randomized phase III study of temozolomide versus dacarbazine in the treatment of patients with advanced metastatic malignant melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Jan;18(1):158-66. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.1.158.

    PMID: 10623706BACKGROUND
  • Hicklin DJ, Ellis LM. Role of the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway in tumor growth and angiogenesis. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Feb 10;23(5):1011-27. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.06.081. Epub 2004 Dec 7.

    PMID: 15585754BACKGROUND
  • Lev DC, Ruiz M, Mills L, McGary EC, Price JE, Bar-Eli M. Dacarbazine causes transcriptional up-regulation of interleukin 8 and vascular endothelial growth factor in melanoma cells: a possible escape mechanism from chemotherapy. Mol Cancer Ther. 2003 Aug;2(8):753-63.

    PMID: 12939465BACKGROUND
  • George D. Targeting PDGF receptors in cancer--rationales and proof of concept clinical trials. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2003;532:141-51. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0081-0_12.

    PMID: 12908555BACKGROUND
  • Bergers G, Song S, Meyer-Morse N, Bergsland E, Hanahan D. Benefits of targeting both pericytes and endothelial cells in the tumor vasculature with kinase inhibitors. J Clin Invest. 2003 May;111(9):1287-95. doi: 10.1172/JCI17929.

    PMID: 12727920BACKGROUND
  • Erber R, Thurnher A, Katsen AD, Groth G, Kerger H, Hammes HP, Menger MD, Ullrich A, Vajkoczy P. Combined inhibition of VEGF and PDGF signaling enforces tumor vessel regression by interfering with pericyte-mediated endothelial cell survival mechanisms. FASEB J. 2004 Feb;18(2):338-40. doi: 10.1096/fj.03-0271fje. Epub 2003 Dec 4.

    PMID: 14657001BACKGROUND
  • Pietras K, Hanahan D. A multitargeted, metronomic, and maximum-tolerated dose "chemo-switch" regimen is antiangiogenic, producing objective responses and survival benefit in a mouse model of cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Feb 10;23(5):939-52. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.093. Epub 2004 Nov 22.

    PMID: 15557593BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Melanoma

Interventions

TemozolomideSunitinib

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neuroendocrine TumorsNeuroectodermal TumorsNeoplasms, Germ Cell and EmbryonalNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsNeoplasms, Nerve TissueNevi and MelanomasSkin NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

DacarbazineTriazenesOrganic ChemicalsImidazolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsPyrrolesIndolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring

Study Officials

  • Lynn E. Spitler, MD

    Northern California Melanoma Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2006

First Posted

March 17, 2006

Study Start

March 1, 2006

Primary Completion

October 1, 2007

Study Completion

January 1, 2009

Last Updated

February 5, 2009

Record last verified: 2009-02

Locations