Study Stopped
Funding was inadequate to continue; Companies requested closure.
Temodar and Sutent as Therapy for Melanoma
1 other identifier
interventional
7
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is designed to evaluate the safety and appropriate dose of the combination of Temodar and Sutent as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic malignant melanoma (Phase 1). Once the safety and appropriate dose is determined, additional patients will be studied at that dose to determine if there is clinical benefit as determined by the primary end-point of progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months and additional secondary endpoints (Phase II).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_1
Started Mar 2006
Typical duration for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 12, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 17, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2009
CompletedFebruary 5, 2009
February 1, 2009
1.6 years
March 12, 2006
February 3, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Safety and tolerability of this combination
March 2006 through October 2007
Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of this combination
March 2006 through October 2007
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months
March 2006 through October 2007
Progression-free survival (PFS)
March 2006 through October 2007
Overall survival (OS)
October 2006 through January 2009
Objective Response Rate (RR)in patients with measurable lesions
March 2006 through October 2007
Duration of Objective Response in patients with measurable lesions
March 2006 through October 2007
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Single arm, Open Label
EXPERIMENTALSingle arm, Open Label Temodar and Sutent
Interventions
First Cohort: Temozolomide 100 mg/m2 orally week 1 and week 3 of a 28-day cycle; SU11248, 25 mg/day orally on weeks 2, 3, and 4 or a 28 day cycle.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with histologically confirmed, (surgically incurable or unresectable)stage IV metastatic malignant melanoma.
- Patients must not have received any prior cytokine or chemotherapy for stage IV disease.
- ECOG performance status of 0-1.
- Age greater than or equal to 18 years.
- Adequate hematologic, renal and liver function as defined by laboratory values performed within 28 days prior to initiation of dosing.
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than or equal to 1500/uL
- Platelet count greater than or equal to 100,000/uL
- Hemoglobin greater than or equal to 10.0 g/dL
- Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 upper limit of laboratory normal
- Total serum bilirubin less than or equal to1.5 times upper limit of laboratory normal
- LDH less than or equal to 2 times upper limit of laboratory normal
- Serum aspartate transaminase (ASAT/SGOT) or serum alanine transaminase (ALAT/SGPT) ≤ 2.5 times upper limit of laboratory normal, and ≤ 5 times upper limit of laboratory normal in cases of liver metastasis
- Patients must have recovered from effects of major surgery.
- Women of childbearing potential should be using an effective method of contraception. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative urine or serum pregnancy test up to 28 days prior to commencement of dosing and be practicing medically approved contraceptive precautions for at least 6 months after completion of treatment as directed by their physician.
- Men should use an effective method of contraception during treatment and for at least 6 months after completion of treatment as directed by their physician.
- +2 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Major surgery or radiation therapy within 4 weeks of starting the study treatment.
- Evidence of brain metastases.
- NCI CTCAE Version 3.0 grade 3 hemorrhage within 4 weeks of starting the study treatment.
- History of or known spinal cord compression, or carcinomatous meningitis, or evidence of symptomatic brain or leptomeningeal disease on screening CT or MRI scan.
- Any of the following within the 6 months prior to study drug administration: myocardial infarction, severe/unstable angina, coronary/peripheral artery bypass graft, symptomatic congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack, or pulmonary embolism.
- Ongoing cardiac dysrhythmias of NCI CTCAE Version 3.0 grade equal to or greater than 2.
- Prolonged QTc interval on baseline EKG.
- Uncontrolled hypertension (\>150/100 mm Hg despite optimal medical therapy).
- Pre-existing thyroid abnormality with thyroid function that cannot be maintained in the normal range with medication.
- Known active infection.
- Concurrent treatment on another clinical trial. Supportive care trials or non-treatment trials, e.g. QOL, are allowed.
- Treatment with drugs with dysrhythmic potential including terfenadine, quinidine, procainamide, disopyramide, sotalol, probucol, bepridil, haloperidol, risperidone, and/or indapamide.
- Other severe acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with study participation or study drug administration, or may interfere with the interpretation of study results, and in the judgment of the investigator would make the subject inappropriate for entry into this study.
- Frequent vomiting or medical condition which could interfere with oral medication intake (e.g. partial bowel obstruction).
- Previous cancer (unless a DRS interval of at least 5 years) or concurrent malignancies at other sites with the exception of surgically cured carcinoma in-situ of the cervix and basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin.
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Northern California Melanoma Centerlead
- Pfizercollaborator
- Schering-Ploughcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Northern California Melanoma Center
San Francisco, California, 94109, United States
Related Publications (7)
Middleton MR, Grob JJ, Aaronson N, Fierlbeck G, Tilgen W, Seiter S, Gore M, Aamdal S, Cebon J, Coates A, Dreno B, Henz M, Schadendorf D, Kapp A, Weiss J, Fraass U, Statkevich P, Muller M, Thatcher N. Randomized phase III study of temozolomide versus dacarbazine in the treatment of patients with advanced metastatic malignant melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Jan;18(1):158-66. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.1.158.
PMID: 10623706BACKGROUNDHicklin DJ, Ellis LM. Role of the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway in tumor growth and angiogenesis. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Feb 10;23(5):1011-27. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.06.081. Epub 2004 Dec 7.
PMID: 15585754BACKGROUNDLev DC, Ruiz M, Mills L, McGary EC, Price JE, Bar-Eli M. Dacarbazine causes transcriptional up-regulation of interleukin 8 and vascular endothelial growth factor in melanoma cells: a possible escape mechanism from chemotherapy. Mol Cancer Ther. 2003 Aug;2(8):753-63.
PMID: 12939465BACKGROUNDGeorge D. Targeting PDGF receptors in cancer--rationales and proof of concept clinical trials. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2003;532:141-51. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0081-0_12.
PMID: 12908555BACKGROUNDBergers G, Song S, Meyer-Morse N, Bergsland E, Hanahan D. Benefits of targeting both pericytes and endothelial cells in the tumor vasculature with kinase inhibitors. J Clin Invest. 2003 May;111(9):1287-95. doi: 10.1172/JCI17929.
PMID: 12727920BACKGROUNDErber R, Thurnher A, Katsen AD, Groth G, Kerger H, Hammes HP, Menger MD, Ullrich A, Vajkoczy P. Combined inhibition of VEGF and PDGF signaling enforces tumor vessel regression by interfering with pericyte-mediated endothelial cell survival mechanisms. FASEB J. 2004 Feb;18(2):338-40. doi: 10.1096/fj.03-0271fje. Epub 2003 Dec 4.
PMID: 14657001BACKGROUNDPietras K, Hanahan D. A multitargeted, metronomic, and maximum-tolerated dose "chemo-switch" regimen is antiangiogenic, producing objective responses and survival benefit in a mouse model of cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Feb 10;23(5):939-52. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.093. Epub 2004 Nov 22.
PMID: 15557593BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lynn E. Spitler, MD
Northern California Melanoma Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 12, 2006
First Posted
March 17, 2006
Study Start
March 1, 2006
Primary Completion
October 1, 2007
Study Completion
January 1, 2009
Last Updated
February 5, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-02