NCT00303706

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive endoscopic harvest of the radial artery to the conventional open method of radial artery harvest in coronary artery bypass surgery. The researchers hypothesize that the radial artery can be safely, efficiently, and routinely harvested using a minimally invasive endoscopic technique. Endoscopic minimally invasive harvesting of the radial artery will reduce the postoperative morbidity due to pain, wound infection, and neurological complications and improve cosmetic results.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
119

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_2 coronary-artery-disease

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2005

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2005

Completed
12 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 15, 2006

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 17, 2006

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2007

Completed
Last Updated

February 17, 2020

Status Verified

February 1, 2020

First QC Date

March 15, 2006

Last Update Submit

February 13, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

CABG, Endoscopic, Radial ArteryRadial Artery ConduitCoronary Artery Bypass SurgeryEndoscopic technique

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The primary outcome event will be the rate of forearm wound infection at 6 weeks.

    6 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Wound pain

    6 weeks

  • Neurological complications

    6 weeks

  • Patient satisfaction

    6 weeks

  • Length of hospitalization

    will vary with patient lenght of stay

  • Histological integrity of the harvested radial artery

    during OR

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Eligible patients greater than 18 years of age with coronary artery disease requiring elective, urgent, or emergency coronary artery revascularization where the radial artery can be used as a bypass conduit.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient's refusal to have surgery, inability to give informed consent, and contraindication in harvesting the radial artery.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital

London, Ontario, N6A 5A5, Canada

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Kiaii B, Moon BC, Massel D, Langlois Y, Austin TW, Willoughby A, Guiraudon C, Howard CR, Guo LR. A prospective randomized trial of endoscopic versus conventional harvesting of the saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Feb;123(2):204-12. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2002.118682.

    PMID: 11828277BACKGROUND
  • Possati G, Gaudino M, Prati F, Alessandrini F, Trani C, Glieca F, Mazzari MA, Luciani N, Schiavoni G. Long-term results of the radial artery used for myocardial revascularization. Circulation. 2003 Sep 16;108(11):1350-4. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000087402.13786.D0. Epub 2003 Aug 25.

    PMID: 12939220BACKGROUND
  • Trick WE, Scheckler WE, Tokars JI, Jones KC, Smith EM, Reppen ML, Jarvis WR. Risk factors for radial artery harvest site infection following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Feb;30(2):270-5. doi: 10.1086/313657.

    PMID: 10671327BACKGROUND
  • Brodman RF, Frame R, Camacho M, Hu E, Chen A, Hollinger I. Routine use of unilateral and bilateral radial arteries for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Oct;28(4):959-63. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(96)00265-3.

    PMID: 8837574BACKGROUND
  • Denton TA, Trento L, Cohen M, Kass RM, Blanche C, Raissi S, Cheng W, Fontana GP, Trento A. Radial artery harvesting for coronary bypass operations: neurologic complications and their potential mechanisms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001 May;121(5):951-6. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2001.112833.

    PMID: 11326239BACKGROUND
  • Dumanian GA, Segalman K, Mispireta LA, Walsh JA, Hendrickson MF, Wilgis EF. Radial artery use in bypass grafting does not change digital blood flow or hand function. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998 May;65(5):1284-7. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)00176-3.

    PMID: 9594852BACKGROUND
  • Serricchio M, Gaudino M, Tondi P, Gasbarrini A, Gerardino L, Santoliquido A, Pola P, Possati G. Hemodynamic and functional consequences of radial artery removal for coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol. 1999 Dec 1;84(11):1353-6, A8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00573-1.

    PMID: 10614806BACKGROUND
  • Connolly MW, Torrillo LD, Stauder MJ, Patel NU, McCabe JC, Loulmet DF, Subramanian VA. Endoscopic radial artery harvesting: results of first 300 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 Aug;74(2):502-5; discussion 506. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03717-7.

    PMID: 12173836BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive DiseasesVascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Bob Kiaii, MD, FRCSC

    Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Western Ontario and the London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 15, 2006

First Posted

March 17, 2006

Study Start

April 1, 2005

Study Completion

August 1, 2007

Last Updated

February 17, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-02

Locations