Study of Endoscopic Versus Open Harvest of the Radial Artery in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
A Prospective Randomized Trial of Endoscopic Versus Conventional Harvesting of the Radial Artery in Coronary Artery Bypass
1 other identifier
interventional
119
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive endoscopic harvest of the radial artery to the conventional open method of radial artery harvest in coronary artery bypass surgery. The researchers hypothesize that the radial artery can be safely, efficiently, and routinely harvested using a minimally invasive endoscopic technique. Endoscopic minimally invasive harvesting of the radial artery will reduce the postoperative morbidity due to pain, wound infection, and neurological complications and improve cosmetic results.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2 coronary-artery-disease
Started Apr 2005
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 15, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 17, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2007
CompletedFebruary 17, 2020
February 1, 2020
March 15, 2006
February 13, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary outcome event will be the rate of forearm wound infection at 6 weeks.
6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Wound pain
6 weeks
Neurological complications
6 weeks
Patient satisfaction
6 weeks
Length of hospitalization
will vary with patient lenght of stay
Histological integrity of the harvested radial artery
during OR
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Eligible patients greater than 18 years of age with coronary artery disease requiring elective, urgent, or emergency coronary artery revascularization where the radial artery can be used as a bypass conduit.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient's refusal to have surgery, inability to give informed consent, and contraindication in harvesting the radial artery.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital
London, Ontario, N6A 5A5, Canada
Related Publications (8)
Kiaii B, Moon BC, Massel D, Langlois Y, Austin TW, Willoughby A, Guiraudon C, Howard CR, Guo LR. A prospective randomized trial of endoscopic versus conventional harvesting of the saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Feb;123(2):204-12. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2002.118682.
PMID: 11828277BACKGROUNDPossati G, Gaudino M, Prati F, Alessandrini F, Trani C, Glieca F, Mazzari MA, Luciani N, Schiavoni G. Long-term results of the radial artery used for myocardial revascularization. Circulation. 2003 Sep 16;108(11):1350-4. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000087402.13786.D0. Epub 2003 Aug 25.
PMID: 12939220BACKGROUNDTrick WE, Scheckler WE, Tokars JI, Jones KC, Smith EM, Reppen ML, Jarvis WR. Risk factors for radial artery harvest site infection following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Feb;30(2):270-5. doi: 10.1086/313657.
PMID: 10671327BACKGROUNDBrodman RF, Frame R, Camacho M, Hu E, Chen A, Hollinger I. Routine use of unilateral and bilateral radial arteries for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Oct;28(4):959-63. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(96)00265-3.
PMID: 8837574BACKGROUNDDenton TA, Trento L, Cohen M, Kass RM, Blanche C, Raissi S, Cheng W, Fontana GP, Trento A. Radial artery harvesting for coronary bypass operations: neurologic complications and their potential mechanisms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001 May;121(5):951-6. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2001.112833.
PMID: 11326239BACKGROUNDDumanian GA, Segalman K, Mispireta LA, Walsh JA, Hendrickson MF, Wilgis EF. Radial artery use in bypass grafting does not change digital blood flow or hand function. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998 May;65(5):1284-7. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)00176-3.
PMID: 9594852BACKGROUNDSerricchio M, Gaudino M, Tondi P, Gasbarrini A, Gerardino L, Santoliquido A, Pola P, Possati G. Hemodynamic and functional consequences of radial artery removal for coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol. 1999 Dec 1;84(11):1353-6, A8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00573-1.
PMID: 10614806BACKGROUNDConnolly MW, Torrillo LD, Stauder MJ, Patel NU, McCabe JC, Loulmet DF, Subramanian VA. Endoscopic radial artery harvesting: results of first 300 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 Aug;74(2):502-5; discussion 506. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03717-7.
PMID: 12173836BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bob Kiaii, MD, FRCSC
Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Western Ontario and the London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 15, 2006
First Posted
March 17, 2006
Study Start
April 1, 2005
Study Completion
August 1, 2007
Last Updated
February 17, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02