NCT00302406

Brief Summary

This is a single-blind study looking at the efficacy and satisfaction of Concerta substitution in adult subjects with ADHD receiving immediate release methylphenidate. Subjects will be administered a maximum dose of 1.3mg/kg/day of either methylphenidate or Concerta. The specific hypotheses of this study are: Hypothesis 1: ADHD symptomatology in adults with DSM-IV, ADHD will continue to be controlled in patients switched from MPH IR TID to Concerta. Hypothesis 2: Patient satisfaction will not decrease in patients switched from MPH IR TID to Concerta (ie., all patients will be equally or more satisfied on Concerta as compared with MPH IR TID.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2003

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2003

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 10, 2006

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 14, 2006

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2007

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2007

Completed
Last Updated

July 12, 2011

Status Verified

July 1, 2011

Enrollment Period

4.3 years

First QC Date

March 10, 2006

Last Update Submit

July 11, 2011

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Primary Outcomes: maintenance of symptom control when switched from TID IR MPH to Concerta administered once a day in the AM and to assess if this differs from 100%, the value one would expect if Concerta maintained efficacy in all subjects.

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 55 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Signed written informed consent to participate in the study.
  • Male and female outpatients older than 18 and younger than 55 years of age.
  • If female, non-pregnant, non-nursing with a negative urine pregnancy test and using medically accepted means of birth control (abstinence, birth control pills, IUD, barrier devices, or progesterone rods stabilized for at least three months) while in this study.
  • Responders to methylphenidate IR on stable treatment (Stable treatment is defined as a score on the NIMH CGI improvement scale of much or very improved (compared to pre-treatment) from a period of 4 weeks on a stable dose of MPH IR TID).
  • Responders to methylphenidate IR on stable treatment who are satisfied with their treatment (satisfaction with treatment is defined as a score of 1 or 2 on the Treatment Satisfaction Rating scale from a period of 4 weeks on a stable dose of MPH IR TID).
  • Responders to methylphenidate IR on stable treatment who tolerate their treatment (toleration of treatment is defined as a score on the Tolerability Index of 0 or 1) from a period of 4 weeks on a stable dose of MPH IR TID).
  • Mild cases of asthma and allergy.
  • Acid reflux syndrome.
  • Hypercholesterolemia.
  • Subjects with a past history of tics but tic free for \> 1 year.
  • Subjects with past history of depression, anxiety disorder (including OCD) without current disorder for \> 6 months as ascertained through structured diagnostic interview and clinical exam.
  • Subjects treated for anxiety disorders (including OCD), and depression who are on a stable medication regimen for at least three months, and who have a disorder specific CGI-severity score ≤ 3 (mildly ill) and who have a score on the Hamilton-Depression and Hamilton-anxiety rating scale below 15 (mild range) will be included in the study.
  • Subjects receiving non-MAOI antidepressants (e.g., SSRI's, venlafaxine), benzodiazepines, on a stable regimen for \> 3 months for any of the conditions listed above.

You may not qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of, or family history of Tourette's syndrome, or Autism.
  • History of seizures.
  • Subjects with history of tics in the past year.
  • Subjects with a known recent history (within the past six (6) months) of illicit drug or alcohol dependence.
  • Any clinically unstable psychiatric conditions including the following: bipolar disorder, acute psychosis, acute panic, acute OCD, acute mania, acute suicidality, acute substance use disorders (alcohol or drugs), acute OCD, sociopathy, criminality or delinquency.
  • Subjects currently (within the past 4 weeks) receiving bupropion.
  • Any metabolic, neurological, hepatic, renal, cardiovascular, hematological, opthalmic, or endocrine disease.
  • Clinically significant abnormal baseline laboratory values, which include the following:
  • Values larger than 20% above the upper range of the laboratory standard of a basic metabolic screen.
  • Organic brain disorders.
  • Mental impairment as evidenced by an I.Q. \<70 as determined by an abbreviated version of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales-Revised (WAIS-III) and the Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT-III).
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Glaucoma.
  • Non English speaking subjects will not be allowed into the study for the following reasons: a) the assessment instruments are not available and have not been adequately standardized in other languages; b) our clinical trials facility is located in Cambridge and not in the MGH main campus without the availability of translators; and c) even if such translation services were to be available, the assessments in the English language conducted by English speaking clinicians and raters with English speaking subjects is already extremely time consuming lasting many hours making it unfeasible, unrealistic, and of dubious clinical validity to conduct them with a translator with non English speaking subjects; d) psychiatric questionnaires and evaluations are taxing and adding the complexity of a translator has the potential to make the patient experience even more exhausting.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Massachusetts General Hospital

Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02138, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity

Interventions

Methylphenidate

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior DisordersNeurodevelopmental DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PhenylacetatesAcids, CarbocyclicCarboxylic AcidsOrganic ChemicalsPiperidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Study Officials

  • Thomas Spencer, MD

    Massachusetts General Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2006

First Posted

March 14, 2006

Study Start

July 1, 2003

Primary Completion

November 1, 2007

Study Completion

November 1, 2007

Last Updated

July 12, 2011

Record last verified: 2011-07

Locations