Comparison of Infant Pain Responses Between Two Different Methods of Urine Collection
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine which of the two procedures commonly used to collect urine, percutaneous suprapubic aspiration (SPA) and urethral catheterization (UC), is less painful, and the success rates and complication rates associated with both methods.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3 pain
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 28, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 2, 2006
CompletedFebruary 23, 2007
August 1, 2006
February 28, 2006
February 22, 2007
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
infant pain response, as measured by facial grimacing and changes in heart rate and oxygen saturation during the procedure
Secondary Outcomes (3)
success rate of obtaining a sample suitable for analysis
adverse events, such as post-procedure haematuria, haemorrhage, haematoma, peritonitis, bowel perforation, abdominal wall abscess, and induction of infection, bladder perforation, urethral knots
success rate of procedure according to infant factors; gestational age and sex
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) who require urine samples for microbiological analysis
You may not qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of birth asphyxia or seizures
- Neurological conditions
- Congenital anomalies associated with the central nervous system, gut, or genitourinary tract
- Abdominal distension or abdominal infection/cellulitis
- Colostomy
- Inguinal hernia
- Organomegaly
- Bleeding diatheses (thrombocytopenia or coagulopathy)
- Receiving analgesics or sedatives
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Mount Sinai Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5, Canada
The Hospital for Sick Children
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8, Canada
Related Publications (1)
El-Naggar W, Yiu A, Mohamed A, Shah V, Manley J, McNamara P, Taddio A. Comparison of pain during two methods of urine collection in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2010 Jun;125(6):1224-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-3284. Epub 2010 May 17.
PMID: 20478939DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anna Taddio, PhD
The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto Canada
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 28, 2006
First Posted
March 2, 2006
Study Start
February 1, 2006
Last Updated
February 23, 2007
Record last verified: 2006-08