NCT00297362

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of galantamine hydrobromide in patients with Alzheimer's disease who have not received or have not responded to treatment with medication similar to galantamine hydrobromide.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
344

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2004

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2004

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2005

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 24, 2006

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 28, 2006

Completed
Last Updated

March 26, 2012

Status Verified

March 1, 2012

First QC Date

February 24, 2006

Last Update Submit

March 23, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

Alzheimer DiseaseDementiaBrain DiseaseMemory LossCaregiverGalantamine hydrobromideNervous System DiseasesMental Disorders

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Changes from baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scale scores

    The MMSE is a brief 30-point questionnaire test that is used to screen for cognitive impairment. A score greater than or equal to 25 points is effectively normal (intact). Below this, scores can indicate severe (≤9 points), moderate (10-20 points) or mild (21-24 points) cognitive impairment.

    Baseline to 6 months

  • Changes from baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) scale scores

    The 40-item DAD scale assesses functional abilities in activities of daily living in patients with dementia and other cognitive impairments. Higher scores indicate less disability while lower scores denote more difficulties.

    Baseline to 6 months

  • Changes from baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) scale scores

    The NPI assesses psychopathology in dementia patients. It evaluates 12 neuropsychiatric disturbances common in dementia: delusions, hallucinations, agitation, dysphoria, anxiety, apathy, irritability, euphoria, disinhibition, aberrant motor behavior, night-time behavior disturbances, and appetite and eating abnormalities. Both the frequency (from rarely to very often) and the severity (from mild to severe) of each behavior are determined.

    Baseline to 6 months

  • Changes from baseline in Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale scores

    The CGI-S rating scale is a 7 point global assessment that measures the clinician's impression of the severity of illness exhibited by a patient. A rating of 1 is equivalent to "Normal, not at all ill" and a rating of 7 is equivalent to "Among the most extremely ill patients".

    Baseline to 6 months

  • Changes from baseline in Cornell Scale

    The Cornell Scale assesses signs and symptoms of major depression in patients with dementia. Each item is rated for severity on a scale of 0-2 (0=absent, 1=mild or intermittent, 2=severe). The item scores are added. Scores above 10 indicate a probable major depression. Scores above 18 indicate a definite major depression. Scores below 6 as a rule are associated with absence of significant depressive symptoms.

    Baseline to 6 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Number of patients with Adverse Events as Measure of Safety and Tolerability

    6 months

  • Number of patients whose vital signs fell outside the normal ranges

    6 months

  • Number of patients whose laboratory test results fell outside the normal ranges

    6 months

Study Arms (1)

Galantamine hydrobromide

Drug: Galantamine hydrobromide

Interventions

247 patients with diagnosed mild to moderate Alzheimer disease.

Galantamine hydrobromide

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

247 patients with diagnosed with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease with a score of 10-26 on the Mini Mental Status Exam. Patients switching from an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor treatment due to lack of efficacy or poor tolerability.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with a score of 10-26 on the Mini Mental Status Exam
  • Patients who have not yet received treatment for their Alzheimer's disease with a medication similar to galantamine or patients who have been treated with as medication similar to galantamine hydrobromide and who have discontinued that medication due to lack of effectiveness or poor tolerability (adverse events)

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with severely decreased liver or kidney function
  • Patients with a digestive system or urinary blockage who are recovering from digestive system or urinary bladder surgery
  • Patients with clinically significant unstable or uncontrolled hormonal or mental disease
  • Patients who are unable to take the medication either alone or with help from another person who is available during the entire study period

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer DiseaseDementiaBrain DiseasesMemory DisordersNervous System DiseasesMental Disorders

Interventions

Galantamine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Central Nervous System DiseasesTauopathiesNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeurocognitive DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Amaryllidaceae AlkaloidsAlkaloidsHeterocyclic CompoundsBenzazepinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring

Study Officials

  • Janssen-Cilag Pharmaceutica S.A.C.I. Clinical Trial

    Janssen-Cilag Pharmaceutica S.A.C.I.

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 24, 2006

First Posted

February 28, 2006

Study Start

June 1, 2004

Study Completion

October 1, 2005

Last Updated

March 26, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-03