Comparing Clinical Outcome of 2 Different Total Knee Prostheses: Nexgen LPS-Flex Versus AGC
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A randomized blinded study is conducted comparing 2 different knee prostheses. Range of motion (ROM), pain, feel of prosthesis, satisfaction and ability to do daily activities are registered at intervals up to one year postop, where patients are informed on which prosthesis they received. We want to:
- determine whether an increased ROM is achieved with a high-flex knee compared to a standard knee
- and if so, does it matter
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jan 2004
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 21, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 22, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2010
CompletedFebruary 22, 2006
October 1, 2003
February 21, 2006
February 21, 2006
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
ROM
Pain
Satisfaction
Feel of prosthesis
Gait analysis
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age below 75 years and active
- preop ROM at least 120 degress flexion
- BMI below 30
- intact ligaments
You may not qualify if:
- below 18 years
- unable to understand language or purpose
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
orthopedic department, section of arthroplasty, Hvidovre University Hospital
Copenhagen, Hvidovre, 2650, Denmark
Related Publications (1)
Thomsen MG, Husted H, Otte KS, Holm G, Troelsen A. Do patients care about higher flexion in total knee arthroplasty? A randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Apr 8;14:127. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-127.
PMID: 23565578DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Henrik Husted, consultant
head of arthroplasty section
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kristian Stahl Otte, consultant
arthroplasty section
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gitte Holm, RN
Head nurse of arthroplasty section
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Helle Krogshøj Hansen, RN
nurse
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 21, 2006
First Posted
February 22, 2006
Study Start
January 1, 2004
Study Completion
January 1, 2010
Last Updated
February 22, 2006
Record last verified: 2003-10