Study Stopped
Terminated for futility.
An Evaluation of Hyperbaric Treatments for Children With Cerebral Palsy
An Evaluation of the Therapeutic Effectiveness of Hyperbaric Oxygen Treatments and Hyperbaric Air Treatments for Children With Cerebral Palsy
6 other identifiers
interventional
49
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The study is to evaluate the effectiveness of hyperbaric treatments and the potential longer-term effects in children between the ages of 3 and 8 years with spastic cerebral palsy (CP). One group will receive 100% oxygen and the other group will receive the equivalent of 21% oxygen (room air). The children will receive pre-treatment testing (baseline). After 40 experimental treatments are completed, the children will be retested at 0, 3, and 6 months to evaluate any changes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2005
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 8, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 10, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 28, 2014
CompletedAugust 28, 2014
August 1, 2014
7.3 years
February 8, 2006
February 27, 2014
August 13, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The Difference Between Groups (HBO Minus HBA) in Change in Score (Post-treatment Minus Pre-treatment) on Gross Motor Function Measure Total Score (GMFM-88).
GMFM-88: total percent score on 88 items (I) of motor function grouped into 5 dimensions: A) lying and rolling (17 I), B) sitting (20 I), C) crawling and kneeling (14 I), D) standing (13 I), E) walking, running, jumping (24 I). Each item scored on 0-3 scale: 0 = does not initiate, 1 = initiates, 2 = partially completes, 3 = completes. Scores in each dimension determined by dividing score obtained by maximum possible score for that dimension, and multiplying by 100. Range is 0-100% for each: the higher the percent score, the greater the functional ability. Dimension scores and total GMFM-88 score calculated as: A) lying and rolling: (score achieved/51)x100 B) sitting: (score achieved/60)x100 C) crawling and kneeling: (score achieved/42)x100 D) standing: (score achieved/39)x100 E) walking, running, and jumping: (score achieved/72)x 100 GMFM-88 = (%A+%B+%C+%D+%E)/number of dimensions GMFM-66: \[(total score on subset of 66 items/198)x100\]
Baseline (within 1 week of starting 8-week treatment period) and post-treatment (within 1 week of ending 8-week treatment period)
Secondary Outcomes (16)
The Difference Between Groups (HBO Minus HBA) in Change in Score (Post-treatment Minus Pre-treatment) on Gross Motor Function Measure 66-Item Subscale Score (GMFM-66).
Baseline (within 1 week of starting 8-week treatment period) and post-treatment (within 1 week of ending 8-week treatment period)
The Difference Between Groups (HBO Minus HBA) in Change in Score (Post-treatment Minus Pre-treatment) on Gross Motor Function Measure Dimension A
Baseline (within 1 week of starting 8-week treatment period) and post-treatment (within 1 week of ending 8-week treatment period)
The Difference Between Groups (HBO Minus HBA) in Change in Score (Post-treatment Minus Pre-treatment) on Gross Motor Function Measure Dimension B
Baseline (within 1 week of starting 8-week treatment period) and post-treatment (within 1 week of ending 8-week treatment period)
The Difference Between Groups (HBO Minus HBA) in Change in Score (Post-treatment Minus Pre-treatment) on Gross Motor Function Measure Dimension C
Baseline (within 1 week of starting 8-week treatment period) and post-treatment (within 1 week of ending 8-week treatment period)
The Difference Between Groups (HBO Minus HBA) in Change in Score (Post-treatment Minus Pre-treatment) on Gross Motor Function Measure Dimension D
Baseline (within 1 week of starting 8-week treatment period) and post-treatment (within 1 week of ending 8-week treatment period)
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Hyperbaric Oxygen Treatment (HBO)
EXPERIMENTAL100% oxygen at 1.5 ATA for 60 mins, Mon-Fri, 40 treatments total
Hyperbaric Air Treatment (HBA)
ACTIVE COMPARATOR14% oxygen at 1.5 ATA for 60 mins, Mon-Fri, 40 treatments total
Interventions
100% oxygen at 1.5 ATA for 60 mins, Mon-Fri, 40 treatments total
14% oxygen at 1.5 ATA for 60 mins, Mon-Fri, 40 treatments total
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and female children, ages 3 to 8 years with a diagnosis of spastic cerebral palsy.
- No documented evidence of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE). Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is not one of the major causes of CP.
- Medically cleared to participate. Your child's primary care physician will be asked to medically clear your child before entering the study.
- Able to pass pretest screening exercise. Each child will undergo the following screening exercise to determine the likelihood of being able to participate in the study: In order to assess ability to tolerate the placement of the oxygen hood in the hyperbaric setting, a hyperbaric oxygen hood will be placed upon the shoulders, or body of your child (depending upon size of your child) and with encouragement and comforting by you and study nurse, the child will be asked to maintain the placement of the hood for 15 minutes. Each child will be asked to blow through a straw, blow the nose, drink through a straw, or to swallow on command.
You may not qualify if:
- Any previous HBO treatments.
- Thoracic surgery within 6 months of beginning the study.
- Unstable epilepsy as determined by a history of having had more than one major motor (generalized or partial tonic/clonic) seizure within the past six months. Having multiple motor seizures, requiring more than three anticonvulsant drugs for seizure control; or requiring changes in seizure medications more than once per month.
- Significant pulmonary dysfunction as determined by a history of chronic pulmonary disease, cystic fibrosis, interstitial lung disease, or chronic shortness of breath or cough. Uncontrolled asthma/reactive airway disease.
- Significant behavioral problems requiring medication.
- Any major congenital deformities of the brain or spinal cord.
- Active pneumothorax (collapsed lung).
- Recent cancer treatment with cisplatinum, bleomycin, or doxorubicin.
- Certain heart problems that cause the heart to pump poorly as determined by a history of congenital heart disease, cardiomyopathy, or symptoms of chest pain, dizziness, and shortness of breath.
- Optic neuritis.
- Diabetics requiring insulin therapy.
- Spherocytosis.
- Major GI reflux with frequent emesis.
- Botulinum toxin A (Botox) treatments within 6 months of entering study.
- Before entering the study, we will require that chronic medications be unchanged for the prior three months except for minor dosage adjustments.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Dayton Children's Hospitallead
- United States Department of Defensecollaborator
- Kettering Health Networkcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Dayton Children's Hospital
Dayton, Ohio, 45404-1815, United States
Wound Healing and Hyperbaric Medicine Center
Wpafb, Ohio, 45433-5546, United States
Related Publications (1)
Lacey DJ, Stolfi A, Pilati LE. Effects of hyperbaric oxygen on motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Ann Neurol. 2012 Nov;72(5):695-703. doi: 10.1002/ana.23681. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
PMID: 23071074RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Daniel J. Lacey, MD, PhD
- Organization
- Dayton Children's Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daniel J Lacey, MD, PhD
Children's Medical Center of Dayton, Neurologist
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 8, 2006
First Posted
February 10, 2006
Study Start
August 1, 2005
Primary Completion
November 1, 2012
Study Completion
November 1, 2012
Last Updated
August 28, 2014
Results First Posted
August 28, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-08