Benefits of 'Repeat Back' Protocols Within A Computer-Based Informed Consent Program
1 other identifier
interventional
575
1 country
7
Brief Summary
This is a VA Merit Review Study involving 7 VA medical centers participating in a parallel group randomized trial comparing "repeat back" versus standard electronic consent for 4 common elective surgical procedures (total hip arthroplasty, carotid endarterectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and radical prostatectomy). Baseline covariates include health status (SF-12), reading ability (REALM), and demographics. Primary outcomes are patient comprehension of the informed consent, patient satisfaction with the informed consent and decision making processes, patient satisfaction with care, anxiety (STAI), and provider assessment of the "repeat back" process. In addition, we are electronically capturing data detailing time spent in each phase of the consent process including "repeat back".
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1 surgery
Started Aug 2006
Longer than P75 for phase_1 surgery
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 6, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 8, 2006
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 7, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2009
CompletedJune 6, 2017
June 1, 2017
2.6 years
February 6, 2006
June 2, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patient comprehension; Patient satisfaction; Patient anxiety; Patient compliance; Provider acceptance
45 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Risk-adjusted surgical outcomes
Surgical outcome data is collected by VA NSQIP program within 45 days of each surgical procedure. This data will be linked with study data at end of study enrollment, during the data analysis phase.
Study Arms (2)
Arm 1
OTHERstandard VA surgical iMedConsent process
Arm 2
EXPERIMENTALenhanced version of VA surgical iMedConsent process (repeat-back)
Interventions
Consent process engages patient in discussion about why they are having procedure, risks, benefits, alternatives. Then provider asks patient to "repeat back"what they understand.
Patients are consented in standard VA consent process, where are not necessarily asked to repeat back and no discussion is necessarily documented.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Veterans who are scheduled for one of the four elective surgical procedures;
- who give informed consent to participate in the study;
- and who are also part of the NSQIP.
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to give informed consent;
- requirement for surrogate consent;
- non-elective surgery;
- requirement for more than one elective surgery;
- refusal to participate;
- inability to communicate in English;
- severe visual problems;
- severe psychiatric illness;
- ongoing substance abuse.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (7)
VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver, CO
Denver, Colorado, 80220, United States
James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, FL
Tampa, Florida, 33612, United States
Atlanta VA Medical and Rehab Center, Decatur, GA
Decatur, Georgia, 30033, United States
VA Boston Healthcare System Jamaica Plain Campus, Jamaica Plain, MA
Boston, Massachusetts, 02130, United States
VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System University Drive Division, Pittsburgh, PA
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15240, United States
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Related Publications (9)
Kaafarani HM, Itani KM. Classification versus valuation and grading of surgical complications. J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Aug;209(2):290-1; author reply 291-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.05.020. No abstract available.
PMID: 19632618RESULTItani KM. Let us not forget the Association of VA Surgeons (AVAS). Surgery. 2009 Sep;146(3):525; author reply 525-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.11.013. No abstract available.
PMID: 19715815RESULTItani KM, Kim L. Mechanical bowel preparation or not for elective colorectal surgery. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2008 Dec;9(6):563-5. doi: 10.1089/sur.2008.9957.
PMID: 19216667RESULTItani KM, Akhras KS, Stellhorn R, Quintana A, Budd D, Merchant S. Outcomes associated with initial versus later vancomycin use in patients with complicated skin and skin-structure infections. Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(5):421-30. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200927050-00006.
PMID: 19586079RESULTFink AS, Prochazka AV, Henderson WG, Bartenfeld D, Nyirenda C, Webb A, Berger DH, Itani K, Whitehill T, Edwards J, Wilson M, Karsonovich C, Parmelee P. Predictors of comprehension during surgical informed consent. J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Jun;210(6):919-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.02.049.
PMID: 20510800RESULTFink AS, Prochazka AV, Henderson WG, Bartenfeld D, Nyirenda C, Webb A, Berger DH, Itani K, Whitehill T, Edwards J, Wilson M, Karsonovich C, Parmelee P. Enhancement of surgical informed consent by addition of repeat back: a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2010 Jul;252(1):27-36. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e3ec61.
PMID: 20562609RESULTRosen AK, Loveland SA, Romano PS, Itani KM, Silber JH, Even-Shoshan OO, Halenar MJ, Teng Y, Zhu J, Volpp KG. Effects of resident duty hour reform on surgical and procedural patient safety indicators among hospitalized Veterans Health Administration and Medicare patients. Med Care. 2009 Jul;47(7):723-31. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819a588f.
PMID: 19536029RESULTVolpp KG, Rosen AK, Rosenbaum PR, Romano PS, Itani KM, Bellini L, Even-Shoshan O, Cen L, Wang Y, Halenar MJ, Silber JH. Did duty hour reform lead to better outcomes among the highest risk patients? J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Oct;24(10):1149-55. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1011-z. Epub 2009 May 20.
PMID: 19455368RESULTProchazka AV, Fink AS, Bartenfeld D, Henderson WG, Nyirenda C, Webb A, Berger DH, Itani K, Whitehill T, Edwards J, Wilson M, Karsonovich C, Parmelee P. Patient perceptions of surgical informed consent: is repeat back helpful or harmful? J Patient Saf. 2014 Sep;10(3):140-5. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182a00317.
PMID: 24522223DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Aaron S Fink, MD
Atlanta VA Medical and Rehab Center, Decatur, GA
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 6, 2006
First Posted
February 8, 2006
Study Start
August 7, 2006
Primary Completion
March 31, 2009
Study Completion
March 31, 2009
Last Updated
June 6, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-06