NCT00288496

Brief Summary

Mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) is common practice in elective colorectal surgery. In recent literature the value of MBP is subject of discussion. We conducted a multicenter, randomized study with the goal of comparing outcome of elective colorectal resections and primary anastomoses with and without mechanical bowel preparation in terms of anastomotic leakage and other septic complications. Within the setting of a multicenter randomized trial,1433 patients were randomized before elective colorectal surgery to receive either MBP or to have no MBP but a normal meal on the day before operation. The primary endpoint was anastomotic leakage. Secondary endpoints were septic complications (wound infection, urinary infection, pneumonia, pelvic abscesses), fascia dehiscence and death. The incidence of anastomotic leakage was similar in both groups: 5.1% in patients without MBP versus 4.9% in patients with MBP (p=0.93; 95% confidence interval for the difference (no MBP minus MBP) ranges from -2.3% tot +2.7%). There were no significant differences in other septic complications, fascia dehiscence, or mortality. Fecal contamination, number of days until resumption of a normal diet, and duration of hospital stay were similar in both groups. This study shows that elective colorectal surgery can be safely done without MBP. Therefore, MBP should be abandoned in elective colorectal surgery.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,400

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 1998

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 1998

Completed
5.8 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2004

Completed
2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 7, 2006

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 8, 2006

Completed
Last Updated

February 8, 2006

Status Verified

April 1, 2000

First QC Date

February 7, 2006

Last Update Submit

February 7, 2006

Conditions

Keywords

mechanical bowel preparation, colorectal surgery, anastomotic dehiscence

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The primary endpoint of the study was anastomotic failure.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Secondary endpoints were septic complications (wound infection, urinary infection, pneumonia, pelvic abscesses), fascia dehiscence and death.

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Caroline Contant

Rotterdam, Montessoriweg 1, 3083 AN, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Contant CM, Hop WC, van't Sant HP, Oostvogel HJ, Smeets HJ, Stassen LP, Neijenhuis PA, Idenburg FJ, Dijkhuis CM, Heres P, van Tets WF, Gerritsen JJ, Weidema WF. Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2007 Dec 22;370(9605):2112-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61905-9.

Study Officials

  • Caroline ME Contant, PhD

    Ikazia Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2006

First Posted

February 8, 2006

Study Start

April 1, 1998

Study Completion

February 1, 2004

Last Updated

February 8, 2006

Record last verified: 2000-04

Locations