An Efficacy Evaluation of 2 Different Bowel Cleansing Preparations in Adult Subjects
1 other identifier
interventional
450
1 country
10
Brief Summary
To compare the safety and efficacy of 2 different bowel cleansing preparations prior to colonoscopy in adult subjects.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Feb 2006
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 13, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 19, 2006
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2006
CompletedOctober 19, 2006
October 1, 2006
January 13, 2006
October 18, 2006
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Efficacy - preparation quality using a 4-point scale
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Safety - patient-reported preparation related side-effects
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- Male or female outpatients who are undergoing colonoscopy for the following routinely accepted indications:
- Evaluation of BE results GI bleeding Anemia of unknown etiology Neoplastic disease surveillance Endosonography Inflammatory bowel disease Unknown diarrhea or constipation etiology Polypectomy Laser therapy Routine Screening
- At least 18 years of age
- Otherwise in good health, as determined by physical exam and medical history
- If female, and of child-bearing potential, is using an acceptable form of birth control (hormonal birth control, IUD, double-barrier method, depot contraceptive, sterilized, abstinent, or vasectomized spouse)
- Negative urine pregnancy test at screening, if applicable
- In the Investigator's judgment, subject is mentally competent to provide informed consent to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects with known or suspected ileus, gastrointestinal obstruction, gastric retention, bowel perforation, toxic colitis, or toxic megacolon
- Subjects with impaired consciousness that predisposes them to pulmonary aspiration
- Subjects who are undergoing colonoscopy for foreign body removal and decompression
- Subjects with pre-existing electrolyte disturbances, such as dehydration, or those secondary to the use of diuretics
- Subjects who are taking drugs that may affect electrolyte levels
- Subjects taking laxatives or prokinetic agents that refuse to discontinue these treatments for the duration of the study
- Subjects with known clinically significant electrolyte abnormalities such as hypernatremia, hyperphosphatemia, hypokalemia, or hypocalcemia
- Subjects who are pregnant or lactating, or intending to become pregnant during the study
- Subjects of childbearing potential who refuse a pregnancy test
- Subjects who are allergic to any preparation components
- Subjects who, in the opinion of the Investigator, should not be included in the study for any reason, including inability to follow study procedures
- Subjects who have participated in an investigational clinical, surgical, drug, or device study within the past 30 days
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (10)
Unknown Facility
Anaheim, California, 92801, United States
Unknown Facility
Jupiter, Florida, 33458, United States
Unknown Facility
Miami, Florida, 33173, United States
Unknown Facility
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70809, United States
Unknown Facility
Laurel, Maryland, 20707, United States
Unknown Facility
Great Neck, New York, 11023, United States
Unknown Facility
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612, United States
Unknown Facility
Germantown, Tennessee, 38138, United States
Unknown Facility
Bellevue, Washington, 98004, United States
Unknown Facility
Spokane, Washington, 99207, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael Goldstein, M.D.
Long Island GI Research Group
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 13, 2006
First Posted
January 19, 2006
Study Start
February 1, 2006
Study Completion
August 1, 2006
Last Updated
October 19, 2006
Record last verified: 2006-10