Increasing Contingency Management Success in Smoking Cessation
2 other identifiers
interventional
328
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Incentives can be used to facilitate the acquisition of many healthy behaviors, such as smoking cessation. However, there is much room for improvement in the use of incentives. This study investigates how two aspects of providing incentives influence the effectiveness of using incentives to promote smoking cessation. One aspect is the criterion for providing incentives, e.g., whether to require smoking cessation before providing an incentive or to provide incentives following smoking reductions. The other aspect being investigated is whether it is best to use a fixed incentive amount or an amount that increases with continued cessation success.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2005
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 4, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 9, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 7, 2012
CompletedJune 21, 2012
June 1, 2012
5 years
January 4, 2006
March 9, 2012
June 14, 2012
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Breath Carbon Monoxide Levels Indicating Smoking Abstinence During the Study, i.e., the Number of Breath Samples With Carbon Monoxide (CO) Levels Less Than 3 Parts Per Million (Ppm)
daily for breath CO
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Average Number Cigarettes Reported Smoked Each Day in the Past Week Measured at Follow-up Six Months After Entry Into the Study
past week at follow-up six months after study entry
Study Arms (6)
1
EXPERIMENTALShaping intervention for hard-to-treat smokers
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORfixed criterion intervention for hard-to-treat smokers
3
OTHERNon contingent incentives available to hard to treat smokers
4
EXPERIMENTALAscending incentives values used in Smokers with Early Success
5
ACTIVE COMPARATORfixed value incentives are used in Smokers with Early Success
6
OTHERNon contingent incentives are available to Smokers with Early Success
Interventions
incentives are available for reduced smoking on each study visit which occur each weekday.
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Smoking Cessation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, UTHSCSA, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive
San Antonio, Texas, 78229-3900, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The study was conducted largely as planned. However the study was not designed to adequately test post-treatment outcomes, as this would not be justifiable unless during treatment differences were observed.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. RJ Lamb
- Organization
- UTexas_SanAntonio
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Richard J Lamb, Ph.D.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 4, 2006
First Posted
January 9, 2006
Study Start
June 1, 2005
Primary Completion
June 1, 2010
Study Completion
November 1, 2010
Last Updated
June 21, 2012
Results First Posted
June 7, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-06