Reducing Clinical Inertia in Diabetes Care
2 other identifiers
interventional
61
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this randomized trial we evaluate two conceptually distinct but potentially synergistic interventions designed to reduce clinical inertia in the outpatient care of adults with type 2 diabetes. The project addresses the following specific aims; Specific Aim 1. Implement and assess two conceptually distinct but potentially synergistic interventions to reduce clinical inertia related to control of A1c, SBP, and LDL in adults with diabetes.
- Hypothesis 1. Patients of physicians who receive the Cognitive Behavioral Intervention (CBI) (Group 1) will subsequently have less Clinical Inertia than those who receive no intervention (Group 4).
- Hypothesis 2. Patients of physicians who receive the Office Systems Redesign intervention (CBI) (Group 2) will subsequently have less Clinical Inertia than those who receive no intervention (Group 4).
- Hypothesis 3. Patients of physicians who receive the combined CBI plus OSR intervention (Group 3) will subsequently have less Clinical Inertia than those who receive CBI alone (Group 1) or OSR alone (Group 2). Specific Aim 2. Assess the impact of interventions to reduce clinical inertia on health care charges.
- Hypothesis 4. After adjustment for baseline measures of health care charges, those who receive no intervention (Group 4), will have higher total health care charges over a 24-month follow-up, relative to the patients of physicians in intervention Group 1, Group 2, or Group 3.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus
Started Feb 2006
Longer than P75 for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 3, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 6, 2006
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2009
CompletedSeptember 5, 2012
September 1, 2012
2.3 years
January 3, 2006
September 4, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical inertia
12 month post intervention
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Direct Medical Costs
12 month pre and 12 month post intervention
Study Arms (3)
1
OTHERSimulated case-based learning
2
OTHEREMR clinical decision support tool.
3
NO INTERVENTIONControl group
Interventions
Intervention consists of simulated case based learning for physicians.
Intervention consists of clinical decision support within the electronic medical record.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Physicians must practice at one of the 18 HPMG clinics and meet all these additional eligibility criteria: (a) be a general internist or family physician, (b) provide ongoing clinical care for 20 or more adults with diabetes mellitus in 2003, and (c) provide written informed consent to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
HealthPartners Research Foundation
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55440, United States
Related Publications (5)
O'Connor PJ. Commentary--improving diabetes care by combating clinical inertia. Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 1):1854-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00437.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 16336552BACKGROUNDO'Connor PJ, Desai J, Solberg LI, Reger LA, Crain AL, Asche SE, Pearson TL, Clark CK, Rush WA, Cherney LM, Sperl-Hillen JM, Bishop DB. Randomized trial of quality improvement intervention to improve diabetes care in primary care settings. Diabetes Care. 2005 Aug;28(8):1890-7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.8.1890.
PMID: 16043728BACKGROUNDSperl-Hillen JM, O'Connor PJ, Rush WA, Johnson PE, Gilmer T, Biltz G, Asche SE, Ekstrom HL. Simulated physician learning program improves glucose control in adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010 Aug;33(8):1727-33. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0439.
PMID: 20668151RESULTGilmer TP, O'Connor PJ, Sperl-Hillen JM, Rush WA, Johnson PE, Amundson GH, Asche SE, Ekstrom HL. Cost-effectiveness of an electronic medical record based clinical decision support system. Health Serv Res. 2012 Dec;47(6):2137-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01427.x. Epub 2012 May 11.
PMID: 22578085RESULTO'Connor PJ, Sperl-Hillen JM, Rush WA, Johnson PE, Amundson GH, Asche SE, Ekstrom HL, Gilmer TP. Impact of electronic health record clinical decision support on diabetes care: a randomized trial. Ann Fam Med. 2011 Jan-Feb;9(1):12-21. doi: 10.1370/afm.1196.
PMID: 21242556RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Patrick J O'Connor, MD MPH
HealthPartners Institute
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 3, 2006
First Posted
January 6, 2006
Study Start
February 1, 2006
Primary Completion
June 1, 2008
Study Completion
December 1, 2009
Last Updated
September 5, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-09