Comparison of Vasopressin and Other Pressors in Septic Shock
Comparative Prospective Study of Vasopressin and Catecholamine in Septic Shock
1 other identifier
interventional
20
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the classical tactics in the treatment of septic shock (dopamine, noradrenalin and dobutamine) to the use of vasopressin as first choice pressor. Vasopressin seems to be an interesting alternative in the treatment of septic shock. To this date, available studies have showed that it could correct hyperkinetic syndrome and vasoplegia in septic shocks without noticeable side effect. It as been demonstrated that vasopressin improves renal function, as no effect on digestive organs and as no metabolic effect.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2000
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 22, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 23, 2005
CompletedMay 29, 2006
August 1, 2005
December 22, 2005
May 26, 2006
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To compare the efficiency of vasopressine to the standard and usual treatment of septic shock on the reverse of the hemodynamic criterion of septic shock
Secondary Outcomes (4)
To compare these two categories of treatment on:
tonometric parameters
renal function
in term of tolerance: metabolic effects (increase in lactate and glycaemia), cardiac effects (tachycardia being defined as a heart rate increase of 15%), increase of cardiac enzymes (troponine, CK, CK-MB), and cutanuous vasoconstriction.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Legally major patient presenting a septic shock.
- The time window between beginning of symptoms and onset of treatment is established at 12 hours.
- The patient must be intubated and mechanically ventilated.
- Patient presenting a mean arterial blood pressure of less than 60 mm Hg after adequate fluid resuscitation (at least 1 L of colloid or crystalloid) and 10 ug/Kg/min of dopamine.
- Patient presenting a cardiac index of at least 3 L/min/m2
You may not qualify if:
- Shock other than septic
- cardiac hypokinesia
- a pre-existing organic renal failure that needs hemodyalisis
- oesophagal or gastric phatology that would lead to a naso-gastric tube contraindication
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (6)
American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference: definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med. 1992 Jun;20(6):864-74.
PMID: 1597042BACKGROUNDLandry DW, Levin HR, Gallant EM, Ashton RC Jr, Seo S, D'Alessandro D, Oz MC, Oliver JA. Vasopressin deficiency contributes to the vasodilation of septic shock. Circulation. 1997 Mar 4;95(5):1122-5. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.95.5.1122.
PMID: 9054839BACKGROUNDLuk J, Ajaelo I, Wong V, Wong J, Chang D, Chou L, Reid IA. Role of V1 receptors in the action of vasopressin on the baroreflex control of heart rate. Am J Physiol. 1993 Sep;265(3 Pt 2):R524-9. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1993.265.3.R524.
PMID: 8214142BACKGROUNDMalay MB, Ashton RC Jr, Landry DW, Townsend RN. Low-dose vasopressin in the treatment of vasodilatory septic shock. J Trauma. 1999 Oct;47(4):699-703; discussion 703-5. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199910000-00014.
PMID: 10528604BACKGROUNDReid IA. Role of vasopressin deficiency in the vasodilation of septic shock. Circulation. 1997 Mar 4;95(5):1108-10. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.95.5.1108. No abstract available.
PMID: 9054835BACKGROUNDRozenfeld V, Cheng JW. The role of vasopressin in the treatment of vasodilation in shock states. Ann Pharmacother. 2000 Feb;34(2):250-4. doi: 10.1345/aph.19066.
PMID: 10676834BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Olivier Lesur, Ph d
Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 22, 2005
First Posted
December 23, 2005
Study Start
July 1, 2000
Last Updated
May 29, 2006
Record last verified: 2005-08