Study Stopped
Slow enrollment
A Study to Investigate the Neuroprotective Effect of PROCRIT (Epoetin Alfa) Versus Placebo in Cancer Patients Who Develop Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, 18 Week Pilot Study to Investigate the Neuroprotective Effect of PROCRIT (Epoetin Alfa) on the Development of Peripheral Neuropathy in Patients Receiving Combination Taxane and Platinum-Based Chemotherapy for Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
32
1 country
28
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the neuroprotective effect of PROCRIT (epoetin alfa, a glycoprotein that stimulates red blood cell production) versus placebo in patients with cancer who develop chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy due to combination Taxane and Platinum-Based treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Jun 2006
28 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 16, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 20, 2005
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 7, 2009
CompletedJune 4, 2014
May 1, 2014
2.2 years
December 16, 2005
July 31, 2009
May 21, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The Number of Patients Who Developed Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI CTC) Score >= 1) at Week 12.
NCI CTC neuropathy: a descriptive terminology used to grade the severity of AEs in cancer subjects on a 0-5 scale. A higher score indicates worse peripheral neuropathy.
Baseline to Week 12
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The Number of Patients Who Developed Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI CTC) Score >= 2) at Week 12.
baseline to Day 128
Study Arms (2)
001
EXPERIMENTALPROCRIT 40 000 IU QW Epoetin alpha (PROCRIT) 40 000 IU every week (QW) for 18 weeks (IV or SC)
002
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo Equivalent volume to PROCRIT (1 mL) administered (QW) for 18 weeks (IV or SC)
Interventions
Epoetin alpha (PROCRIT) 40,000 IU every week (QW) for 18 weeks (IV or SC)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with a diagnosis of cancer , and no history of peripheral neuropathy
- Have had the appropriate surgery for carcinoma and are no more than 12 weeks post-operatively at study entry
- Have not received chemotherapy (chemotherapy naïve patients) and are scheduled to receive at least 4 cycles of combination taxane and platinum-based chemotherapy
- Have a hemoglobin value of \>= 10 and \< 12 g/dL
- have a life expectancy of at least 6 months
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who have had prior treatment with PROCRIT (epoetin alfa) or similar drugs (erythropoietic agents) within the last 2 months
- Have used experimental treatments within the last year that are reported or hypothesized to have neuroprotective potential, including amifostine, cyanocobalamin (vitamin B12), alpha-tocopherol (Vitamin E), glutamine, and gabapentin
- have anemia due to factors other than cancer/chemotherapy, or have ongoing neuropathy due to any cause
- Received a transfusion of platelets or packed red blood cells within 28 days prior to the first dose of study medication
- Have a history of pulmonary emboli, deep vein thrombosis, ischemic stroke or any other history of arterial or venous thrombotic events
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (28)
Unknown Facility
Mobile, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Alhambra, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Bakersfield, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Fullerton, California, United States
Unknown Facility
La Verne, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Long Beach, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Northridge, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Oxnard, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Santa Maria, California, United States
Unknown Facility
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Unknown Facility
Hollywood, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Augusta, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Joliet, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Southfield, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Unknown Facility
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
Unknown Facility
Buffalo, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Syracuse, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Unknown Facility
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
No formal analysis was conducted due to early termination
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Vice President
- Organization
- Centocor Ortho Biotech Services, LLC (COBS)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L. C. Clinical Trial
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 16, 2005
First Posted
December 20, 2005
Study Start
June 1, 2006
Primary Completion
August 1, 2008
Study Completion
August 1, 2008
Last Updated
June 4, 2014
Results First Posted
September 7, 2009
Record last verified: 2014-05