Brain Imaging Study Of Rosiglitazone Efficacy And Safety In Alzheimer's Disease
Effects of Avandia on Cognition and Cerebral Glucose Utilisation in Subjects With Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease (AD).
2 other identifiers
interventional
80
3 countries
15
Brief Summary
This is a placebo-controlled study evaluating the effects of rosiglitazone on functional brain activity and cognition in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's Disease (AD).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started May 2004
Typical duration for phase_2
15 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 18, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 12, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 14, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 10, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 10, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 18, 2020
CompletedNovember 18, 2020
October 1, 2020
4.1 years
December 12, 2005
July 26, 2017
October 27, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline (Day 1) in Global and Regional Indices of Cerebral Metabolic Rate of Glucose (CMRglu) at Month 12
Global CMRGlu index was related to grey matter of brain. Regional CMRGlu index was related to assessment of different regions of brain namely posterior cingulate gyrus, frontal lobe, parietal lobe, posterior temporal lobe, cerebellum, and medial temporal lobe. Evaluation of medial temporal lobe CMRGlu included assessment of medial anterior temporal lobe, paraHippocampal Ambiens gyrus, amygdala, and hippocampus. The regional CMRGlu index is directly proportional to the true metabolic rate of glucose. Baseline was defined as Day 1 of the 12 months treatment period. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the Baseline value. Data has been presented for arithmetic mean; however, statistical analysis has been presented for adjusted or least square (LS) mean.
Baseline (Day 1) and Month 12
Secondary Outcomes (26)
Change From Baseline (Day 1) in CMRGlu Indices at Months 1 and 6
Baseline (Day 1), Months 1, and 6
Change From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Words at Months 1, 6, and 12 by Buschke Selective Reminding (BSR) Test
Baseline (Day 1), and Months 1, 6, and 12
Change From Baseline (Day 1) in Delayed Free Recall Items Over Period by Stroop Colour Word Interference (SCWI) at Months 1, 6 and 12
Baseline (Day 1), Months1, 6, and 12
Change From Baseline (Day 1) in Simplified Spatial Paired Associate Learning (SSPAL) Response Over Period
Baseline (Day 1), Months 1, 6, and 12
Change From Baseline (Day 1) in Accuracy by Choice Reaction Time (CRT) Test Over Period
Baseline (Day 1) and up to 12 months
- +21 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Rosiglitazone
EXPERIMENTAL4 mg once a day for 1 month increasing to 8 mg once a day (Extended Released Tablets)
Placebo
OTHERPlacebo dummy to match
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Is male, or if female meets one or more of the following criteria:
- Post-menopausal females defined as menopause is defined as\>6months without menstrual period with an appropriate clinical profile, e.g. age appropriate, history of vasomotor symptoms. However if indicated this should be confirmed by oestradiol and FSH levels consistent with menopause (according to local laboratory ranges). Women who are on HRT treatment, and have not been confirmed as post-menopausal should be advised to use contraception.(See Appendix 4)Pre-menopausal females with a documented (medical report verification) hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment.
- Meets the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Diseases and Stroke/Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) criteria for Alzheimer's disease, regardless of date of diagnosis relative to study entry date. (See Appendix 5) Has an Alzheimer's disease status of mild to moderate, as classified by a Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 16-26 inclusive at screening.
- Is aged \>/= 50 to \</= 85 years Prior and current use of medication corresponds with criteria listed in Appendix 3.
- Has the ability to comply with requirements of cognitive and other testing.
- Has a permanent caregiver who is willing to attend all visits, oversee the subject's compliance with protocol-specified procedures and study medication, and report on subject's status. (Subjects living alone or in a nursing home are not eligible).
- Has provided full written informed consent prior to the performance of any protocol-specified procedure; or if unable to provide informed consent due to cognitive status, provision of informed consent by cognitively intact legally acceptable representative (Where this is in accordance with local laws, regulations and ethics committee policy.) Caregiver has provided full written informed consent prior to the performance of any protocol-specified procedure.
You may not qualify if:
- Is unsuitable for MRI scanning as assessed by local pre-MRI questionnaire (GSK to review.)
- Has a history of or suffers from claustrophobia.
- Is unable to lie comfortably on a bed inside a PET camera with their head in the field of view for at least 60 minutes as assessed by physical examination and medical history (e.g. back pain, arthritis).
- Has a history or presence of other neurological or other medical conditions that may influence the outcome or analysis of the PET scan results. Examples of such conditions include, but are not limited to stroke, traumatic brain injury, epilepsy or space occupying lesions.
- History of Type I or Type II diabetes mellitus.
- Fasting plasma glucose level\>126mg/dL (\>7.0mmol/L) or HbA1c\>6.2%.
- History or clinical/laboratory evidence of moderate congestive heart failure defined by the New York Heart Association criteria (class I-IV)(See Appendix 6).
- Ejection fraction\</=40% determined by echocardiogram, or any other abnormality on echocardiography which in the view of the investigator required further investigation or intervention, or significant abnormalities on screening ECG (in accordance with the definitions below). Significant ECG abnormalities for the purposes of this study. Detection of any of the following abnormalities renders the subject ineligible for the study: 1. ECG heart rate \<50 and \>100 bpm 2. Any previously unrecognised sustained or paroxysmal arrhythmia requiring further intervention e.g. anticoagulation, cardioversion, anti-arrhythmic agent, further investigation etc. 3. PR interval \>0.3 s, 2nd or 3rd degree heart block, symptomatic bifascicular block, trifascicular block. 4. Multifocal ventricular ectopy. 5. Ventricular bigemini or couplets, triplets etc. ECG abnormalities permitted at entry to this study. A subject will not be rendered ineligible by the presence of any of the following abnormalities: 1. AF with a heart rate \<=90 in subjects receiving appropriate anti-platelet or anticoagulant therapy. 2. 1st degree heart block (PR\<=0.3 s). 3. Subjects with a paced rhythm (further information required if subject has an implantable Cardiac Defibrillator). 4. Atrial ectopic beats. 5. Unifocal ventricular ectopic beats. 6. Left or right bundle branch block. 7. Asymptomatice bifascicular block. 8. Left ventricular hypertrophy. 9. Q waves present suggesting previous MI. 10. Repolarisation abnormalities History of new cardiovascular event within the last 6 months (i.e. intervention, percutaneous coronary intervention, vascular surgery, acute coronary syndrome \[non Q-wave myocardial infarction, Q-wave myocardial infarction, unstable angina) or significant arrhythmia; or major intervention (e.g. cardiac surgery or angiography plus stenting) scheduled.
- History or clinical laboratory evidence of cerebrovascular disease (stroke, transient ischaemic attack, haemorrhage), or diagnosis of possible, probable or definite vascular dementia in accordance with National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, and Association Internationale pour la Recherche et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences (NINDS-AIREN) criteria (See Appendix 8).
- History or evidence of any other CNS disorder that could be interpreted as a cause of dementia: e.g. structural abnormality, epilepsy, infectious or inflammatory/demyelinating CNS conditions, Parkinson's disease.
- Significant peripheral oedema at the time of screening as assessed by Clinical Evaluation of Oedema and/or Signs of Congestive Heart Failure (Appendix 14)
- History of major psychiatric illness such as schizophrenia or bipolar affective disorder, or current depression (score on Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) depression questions \>7, See Appendix 9).
- Systolic blood pressure \>165 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure \>95 mmHG whilst receiving optimal antihypertensive therapy according to local practice.
- Clinically significant anaemia (i.e.haemoglobin \<11g/dL for males or \<10 g/dL for females) or presence of haemoglobinopathies which would prevent accurate assessment of HbA1c.
- Renal dysfunction, defined as creatinine clearance \<30 ml/min (calculated from serum creatinine using the Cockcroft-Gault formula, See Appendix 10).
- +11 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKlinelead
Study Sites (15)
GSK Investigational Site
Litchfield Park, Arizona, 85340, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Sun City, Arizona, 85351, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85724, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90024, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Belmont, Massachusetts, 02478, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Durham, North Carolina, 27705, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Montreal, Quebec, H4H 1R3, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Liverpool, L9 7LJ, United Kingdom
GSK Investigational Site
Manchester, M20 3LJ, United Kingdom
GSK Investigational Site
Swindon, SN1 4HZ, United Kingdom
GSK Investigational Site
West End, Southampton, SO30 3JB, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Tzimopoulou S, Cunningham VJ, Nichols TE, Searle G, Bird NP, Mistry P, Dixon IJ, Hallett WA, Whitcher B, Brown AP, Zvartau-Hind M, Lotay N, Lai RY, Castiglia M, Jeter B, Matthews JC, Chen K, Bandy D, Reiman EM, Gold M, Rabiner EA, Matthews PM. A multi-center randomized proof-of-concept clinical trial applying [(1)(8)F]FDG-PET for evaluation of metabolic therapy with rosiglitazone XR in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;22(4):1241-56. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2010-100939.
PMID: 20930300DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- GSK Response Center
- Organization
- GlaxoSmithKline
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
GSK Clinical Trials
GlaxoSmithKline
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 12, 2005
First Posted
December 14, 2005
Study Start
May 18, 2004
Primary Completion
July 10, 2008
Study Completion
July 10, 2008
Last Updated
November 18, 2020
Results First Posted
November 18, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.