Project ACT: Advancing Caregiving Techniques
Reducing Family Caregiver Upset With Disruptive Behavior
1 other identifier
interventional
272
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The specific aims of this study are to:
- 1.Test the immediate effectiveness of the intervention to reduce caregiver upset with targeted disruptive behaviors (primary outcome). Hypothesis: Caregivers in the intervention group will report less upset with target behaviors at 4-months in comparison to caregivers in the control group.
- 2.Test the immediate effectiveness of the intervention to reduce caregiver burden (secondary outcome). Hypothesis: Caregivers in the intervention group will report less burden at 4-months in comparison to caregivers in the control group.
- 3.Test the immediate effectiveness of the intervention to reduce the frequency of occurrence of targeted disruptive behaviors in persons with dementia (secondary outcome). Hypothesis: Caregivers in the intervention group will report a decrease in the frequency of occurrence of targeted behaviors at 4-months in comparison to caregivers in the control group.
- 4.Test the maintenance effect of intervention at 6-months on caregiver upset and burden and targeted disruptive behaviors. Hypothesis: Compared to usual care, caregivers in intervention will maintain reduced upset and burden and report less occurrences of targeted behaviors from 4 to 6-months.
- 5.Assess the cost of the intervention and its cost effectiveness.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Aug 2001
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2001
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 28, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 29, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2015
CompletedMay 13, 2015
May 1, 2015
12.6 years
November 28, 2005
May 12, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Caregiver upset
Baseline, t2, t3
Care recipient behaviors
Baseline, t2, t3
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Caregiver self-efficacy
Baseline, t2, t3
Nursing home placement
When needed
Caregiver depression
Baseline, t2, t3
Interventions
occupational therapy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Caregivers are eligible for study participation if they:
- are a family member 21 years of age or older (male or female),
- live with the care recipient,
- able to participate in the interview in English
- have a telephone in their home,
- plan to live in the area for 6 months, and
- report a high level of upset with behaviors as follows. We will use the Agitated Behavior in Dementia Scale (ABID),62 which is a 16-item psychometrically valid scale of behavioral occurrences and associated caregiver upset. We chose this scale out of the six primary scales used to measure behavior given that the behaviors most closely match the intent of the intervention we plan to test. The behaviors include those listed earlier plus one additional behavior, repetitive vocalization. For each of these 17 behaviors that occur in the past week (for the purposes of screening eligibility, we will use a yes/no response format), caregivers are asked their level of upset (0 = not at all, 1 = a little, 2 = moderately, 3 = very much and 4 = extremely).
- Caregivers will be considered eligible if they obtain a total summed score of "3" or higher using the following algorithm:
- Caregivers must report at least one behavior as very ("3") or extremely ("4") upset, or
- caregivers must report three or more behaviors in which one behavior causes at least moderate ("2") level upset and one behavior causes at least a little upset.
- Thus, caregivers with only scores of "1" ( a little upset) with three or more behavioral occurrences will not be considered eligible for this study. That is, this criteria excludes caregivers with no upset or a little upset. We will also require that the care recipient: 1) has a NINCDS-ADRDA diagnosis (physician generated) of dementia or a Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) score of \<23.
You may not qualify if:
- A caregiver is excluded if the caregiver or care recipient:
- has a terminal illness with life expectancy \< 6 months,
- is in active treatment for cancer, or
- has had \>3 acute medical hospitalizations in the past year.
- Caregivers will also be excluded if:
- they are currently involved in another clinical trial of psychosocial or educational interventions for caregivers; or
- they are planning to place their family member in a nursing home within the next 6-months.
- Care-recipients will also be excluded if:
- they have schizophrenia or a bi-polar disorder,
- their dementia is secondary to probable head trauma,
- their MMSE score = 0 and they are considered bed-bound, defined as confinement to bed or chair for at least 22 hours a day for at least four of the previous seven days,
- a nursing home admission is planned to occur within six months or
- they are enrolled in a clinical trial of pharmacological treatment for agitation.
- These criteria exclude caregivers of ADRD patients at the severe stage of the disease process who may not benefit from the proposed intervention.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Laura N. Gitlin,Ph.D
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States
Related Publications (5)
Regier NG, Taylor JL, Szanton SL, Parmelee PA, Perrin N, Liu M, Jenkins E, Hodgson NA, Gitlin LN. Pain in persons with dementia and the direct and indirect impacts on caregiver burden. Geriatr Nurs. 2021 Mar-Apr;42(2):366-371. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2021.01.007. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
PMID: 33571930DERIVEDLeggett AN, Kales HC, Gitlin LN. Finding fault: Criticism as a care management strategy and its impact on outcomes for dementia caregivers. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;34(4):571-577. doi: 10.1002/gps.5052. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
PMID: 30556172DERIVEDRose KC, Gitlin LN. Background characteristics and treatment-related factors associated with treatment success or failure in a non-pharmacological intervention for dementia caregivers. Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 Jun;29(6):1005-1014. doi: 10.1017/S1041610217000205. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
PMID: 28260539DERIVEDGitlin LN, Rose K. Impact of caregiver readiness on outcomes of a nonpharmacological intervention to address behavioral symptoms in persons with dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2016 Sep;31(9):1056-63. doi: 10.1002/gps.4422. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
PMID: 26833933DERIVEDHodgson NA, Gitlin LN, Winter L, Czekanski K. Undiagnosed illness and neuropsychiatric behaviors in community residing older adults with dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2011 Apr-Jun;25(2):109-15. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e3181f8520a.
PMID: 20921879DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Laura N Gitlin, Ph.D
Thomas Jefferson University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 28, 2005
First Posted
November 29, 2005
Study Start
August 1, 2001
Primary Completion
March 1, 2014
Study Completion
March 1, 2015
Last Updated
May 13, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-05