Study of Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection (STARR) Surgery in Refractory Constipation Associated With Obstructive Defecation Syndrome (ODS)
A Multi-center Study to Assess the Outcomes of Stapled Trans-Anal Rectal Resection (STARR) in the Treatment of Obstructed Defecation Syndrome (ODS)
1 other identifier
interventional
75
1 country
7
Brief Summary
The primary purpose of this study is to determine how effective and how durable STARR (stapled transanal rectal resection) surgery is in relieving symptoms of intractable constipation associated with obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Oct 2005
Typical duration for phase_4
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 18, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 22, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 7, 2011
CompletedJuly 16, 2018
October 1, 2017
2.4 years
November 18, 2005
October 27, 2009
October 9, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Change (Reduction) in Total ODS Symptom Composite Score From Baseline to One Year Post Procedure
The primary endpoint used to assess effectiveness of STARR for treatment of ODS was the percentage of change in total ODS symptom composite score (0=worst, 24=best) 1 year after completion of the procedure.
one year from Baseline
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Percentage of Change in ODS Symptom Composite Score From Baseline at 1 Month Post Procedure
Baseline, 1 month post procedure
Maximum Change in Subject-reported Assessment of Symptom Severity and Frequency (PAC SYM).
Baseline, 6 months
Percentage of Change in ODS Symptom Composite Score From Baseline at 6 Months (0 is Worst Score, 24 is Best Score)
Baseline, 6 months post procedure
PAC QOL Patient Assessment of Constipation (Overall)
Baseline, 12 months
SF-12 QOL Change From Baseline (Physical Component)at 12 Months
Baseline, 12 Months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Able to comprehend, understand, and speak the English language
- Able to comprehend, follow, and sign an informed consent document (ICD)
- Able to tolerate general or spinal anesthetic
- Often experience excessive straining, sense of incomplete evacuation, and/or prolonged time for complete evacuation when attempting a bowel movement
- Have experienced ODS symptoms for at least 12 months prior to enrollment
- Have a minimum ODS score of 10
- Have rectocele and/or rectal intussusception confirmed by defecography
- Screened for colorectal neoplasia within 7 years of the screening visit (e.g., colonoscopy or barium enema)
- Have an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of no more than 3
- Willing to comply with evaluation and management schedule through 5-year follow-up
You may not qualify if:
- Fecal incontinence to solid stool
- Full-thickness prolapse
- Perineal infection
- Recto-vaginal fistula
- Enterocele (at rest)
- Any complex pelvic floor prolapse requiring a combined surgical approach
- Prior sigmoid or anterior resection or prior rectal anastomosis
- Presence of foreign material adjacent to the rectum (e.g., vaginal mesh)
- Grade IV hemorrhoids
- Pregnancy
- Chronic narcotic use
- Evidence of colorectal neoplasia, carcinoma, or inflammatory bowel disease
- Physical or psychological condition which would impair study participation
- Unable or unwilling to attend follow-up visits and examinations
- Surgical procedure required concurrently with STARR
- +6 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (7)
Colon and Rectal Clinic of Orlando
Orlando, Florida, 32806, United States
Lahey Clinic
Burlington, Massachusetts, 01805, United States
Colon & Rectal Surgery Associates Ltd.
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55454, United States
University Hospitals of Cleveland
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, United States
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Medical University of Ohio, Department of Surgery
Toledo, Ohio, 43614, United States
Portland Medical Center
Portland, Oregon, 97205, United States
Related Publications (16)
Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, Stevenson GW. Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut. 1989 Dec;30(12):1737-49. doi: 10.1136/gut.30.12.1737.
PMID: 2612988BACKGROUNDKenton K, Shott S, Brubaker L. The anatomic and functional variability of rectoceles in women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1999;10(2):96-9. doi: 10.1007/pl00004019.
PMID: 10384970BACKGROUNDTalley NJ, Weaver AL, Zinsmeister AR, Melton LJ 3rd. Functional constipation and outlet delay: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 1993 Sep;105(3):781-90. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(93)90896-k.
PMID: 8359649BACKGROUNDSiproudhis L, Dautreme S, Ropert A, Briand H, Renet C, Beusnel C, Juguet F, Rabot AF, Bretagne JF, Gosselin M. Anismus and biofeedback: who benefits? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1995 Jun;7(6):547-52.
PMID: 7552638BACKGROUNDvan Dam JH, Hop WC, Schouten WR. Analysis of patients with poor outcome of rectocele repair. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Nov;43(11):1556-60. doi: 10.1007/BF02236738.
PMID: 11089592BACKGROUNDFleshman JW, Fry RD, Kodner IJ. The surgical management of constipation. Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol. 1992 Mar;6(1):145-62. doi: 10.1016/0950-3528(92)90024-9.
PMID: 1586766BACKGROUNDAltomare DF, Rinaldi M, Veglia A, Petrolino M, De Fazio M, Sallustio P. Combined perineal and endorectal repair of rectocele by circular stapler: a novel surgical technique. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002 Nov;45(11):1549-52. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6465-9.
PMID: 12432306BACKGROUNDDodi G, Pietroletti R, Milito G, Binda G, Pescatori M. Bleeding, incontinence, pain and constipation after STARR transanal double stapling rectotomy for obstructed defecation. Tech Coloproctol. 2003 Oct;7(3):148-53. doi: 10.1007/s10151-003-0026-4.
PMID: 14628157BACKGROUNDBoccasanta P, Venturi M, Stuto A, Bottini C, Caviglia A, Carriero A, Mascagni D, Mauri R, Sofo L, Landolfi V. Stapled transanal rectal resection for outlet obstruction: a prospective, multicenter trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Aug;47(8):1285-96; discussion 1296-7. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0582-3.
PMID: 15484341BACKGROUNDBoccasanta P, Venturi M, Salamina G, Cesana BM, Bernasconi F, Roviaro G. New trends in the surgical treatment of outlet obstruction: clinical and functional results of two novel transanal stapled techniques from a randomised controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2004 Jul;19(4):359-69. doi: 10.1007/s00384-003-0572-2. Epub 2004 Mar 13.
PMID: 15024596BACKGROUNDPescatori M, Dodi G, Salafia C, Zbar AP. Rectovaginal fistula after double-stapled transanal rectotomy (STARR) for obstructed defaecation. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2005 Jan;20(1):83-5. doi: 10.1007/s00384-004-0658-5. Epub 2004 Sep 2. No abstract available.
PMID: 15349740BACKGROUNDGrassi R, Romano S, Micera O, Fioroni C, Boller B. Radiographic findings of post-operative double stapled trans anal rectal resection (STARR) in patient with obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS). Eur J Radiol. 2005 Mar;53(3):410-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.12.012.
PMID: 15741014BACKGROUNDMongardini M, Custureri F, Schillaci F, Cola A, Maturo A, Fanello G, Corelli S, Pappalardo G. [Prevention of post-operative pain and haemorrhage in PPH (Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids) and STARR (Stapled Trans-Anal Rectal Resection). Preliminary results in 261 cases]. G Chir. 2005 Apr;26(4):157-61. Italian.
PMID: 16035252BACKGROUNDBinda GA, Pescatori M, Romano G. The dark side of double-stapled transanal rectal resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Sep;48(9):1830-1; author reply 1831-2. doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0103-z. No abstract available.
PMID: 15991070BACKGROUNDJayne DG, Finan PJ. Stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defaecation and evidence-based practice. Br J Surg. 2005 Jul;92(7):793-4. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5092. No abstract available.
PMID: 15962257BACKGROUNDTalley NJ, Phillips SF, Wiltgen CM, Zinsmeister AR, Melton LJ 3rd. Assessment of functional gastrointestinal disease: the bowel disease questionnaire. Mayo Clin Proc. 1990 Nov;65(11):1456-79. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)62169-7.
PMID: 2232900BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Susan Knippenberg, Clinical Scientist
- Organization
- Ethicon Endo-Surgery
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Robin F Scamuffa, MS
Ethicon Endo-Surgery
- STUDY DIRECTOR
William Bernie, MD
Ethicon Endo-Surgery
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anthony J Senagore, MD
Medical University of Ohio
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anders F Mellgren, MD, PhD
University of Minnesota
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 18, 2005
First Posted
November 22, 2005
Study Start
October 1, 2005
Primary Completion
March 1, 2008
Study Completion
June 1, 2008
Last Updated
July 16, 2018
Results First Posted
April 7, 2011
Record last verified: 2017-10