Evaluation of Atazanavir Substitution Intervention (EASI) Study
1 other identifier
observational
100
1 country
5
Brief Summary
With the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), it was hypothesized that its consistent use could lead to a cure for HIV infection in as little as three years \[Perelson, 1997\]. Subsequent research has shown this model to be incorrect \[Finzi, 1999\]. In addition, long term use of HAART has now been associated with significant metabolic abnormalities, which could lead to unintended morbidity, possibly worse than what one could expect from the progression of untreated HIV-associated immune disease over the same period of time \[Carr, 2000\]. Accordingly, current recommendations for antiretroviral therapy have become more conservative. It is now suggested that a person with a CD4 count \> 350 cells/mm³ may safely delay initiation of HAART \[Yeni, 2002\].However, for those who still require HAART, the risks of short-term and long-term toxicities remain, even if full virologic suppression is achieved. In this setting, a number of switching strategies have been evaluated (Negredo et al, 2002 \& Martinez et al, 2003), mostly involving single drug substitutions of a protease inhibitor (PI) for a non-nucleoside agent (NNRTI) or abacavir (ABC). In general terms, these hae shown that virologic suppression is usually maintained, with improvement in drug-related side effects, including metabolic toxicities. A number of patients who are currently taking effective HAART are experiencing side effects to one or more of the agents in their regimen that is not severe enough to mandate an immediate change in their regimen, but that is having a measurable effect on their qualify of life. Over time, these effects may have an impact on adherence to therapy and its long-term efficacy. Given the recent availability of ATV (+/-RTV), its once daily administration, low pill count and favourable side effect profile, it is being used in clinical practice as part of single drug substitution strategies in patients exhibiting a maximal response to HAART. There is a clear need to examine this practice in a systematic manner to document its occurrence, efficacy and safety. We hypothesize that, in patients with maximal virologic suppression on a double class regimen (including two NRTIs and an NNRTI or a PI, boosted with RTV or not), and in whom a decision has been made to implement a single drug substitution of the NNRTI or PI for ATV (+/-), this will lead to an improvement in objectively measured quality of life without any negative impact on the virologic efficacy of the regimen.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jul 2004
Typical duration for all trials
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 31, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 2, 2005
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2007
CompletedAugust 22, 2014
August 1, 2014
October 31, 2005
August 20, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Eligibility Criteria
18 years of age or older with a confirmed diagnosis of HIV infection
You may qualify if:
- years of age or older; a confirmed diagnosis of HIV infection; 2 consecutive HIV RNA levels \<50 copies/mL with the most recent being within the past 3 months; have been on the same HAART regimen for the past 3 months; have side effects to their current antiretroviral medications that warrant a consideration of a change in therapy. There must be a clinical suspicion by the investigator that these side effects are attributable to either the PI or the NNRTI component of the regimen; Have agreement between the treating physician and the patient that a single drug substitution to ATV +/- RTV will be proposed, independent of participation in the study; be able to provide written informed consent and complete the quality of life instruments and, in the opinion of the investigator, comply in every other way with the requirements of the study protocol.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
Downtown Infectious Diseases Clinic,
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Oak Tree Clinic
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Pender Community Health Center
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Vancouver General Hospital Clinic
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Cool-Aid Society in Victoria
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Brian Conway, MD
University of British Columbia
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 31, 2005
First Posted
November 2, 2005
Study Start
July 1, 2004
Study Completion
September 1, 2007
Last Updated
August 22, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-08