NCT00247611

Brief Summary

This study will develop and evaluate the efficacy of an individualized, interactive, computer software program delivered in conjunction with clinical care in increasing and supporting antiretroviral therapy adherence in HIV-infected individuals.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
594

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2005

Geographic Reach
1 country

5 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2005

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 31, 2005

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 2, 2005

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2008

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2008

Completed
5.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 20, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

December 20, 2013

Status Verified

November 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

October 31, 2005

Results QC Date

August 1, 2013

Last Update Submit

November 26, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

HIVAIDSAntiretroviral Medication Adherence

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) 3-day Recall Measure of Doses Taken

    This measure asks participants to report the number of doses taken on each of the past 3-days, relative to number he or she was prescribed to take, and produces a % adherence score. For this study, adherence over the past 3-days was established for each medication separately then averaged over the full regimen. For main outcomes, perfect vs imperfect adherence was evaluated. Significant findings on perfect/imperfect adherence were followed with sensitivity tests to determine if lowest threshold (eg., 90%, 80%, 70% adherence) effect was maintained. See: Chesney MA, Ickovics JR, Chambers DB, et al. Self-reported adherence to antiretroviral medications among participants in HIV clinical trials: the AACTG adherence instruments. Patient care committee \& adherence working group of the outcomes committee of the adult AIDS clinical trials group (AACTG). AIDS Care. 2000;12(3):255-266.

    Measured at each clinical care visit over 18 months of participation

  • Visual Analog Scale Measure of Adherence to ART

    This measure asks participants to rate their adherence over the past 3 to 4 weeks using a line that marks from 0 to 100% of doses taken. For this study, this item was asked for each antiretroviral in one's regimen and a total score was produced by averaging all reports. For main outcomes, perfect vs imperfect adherence was evaluated. See: Walsh JC, Mandalia S, Gazzard BG. Responses to a 1 month self-report on adherence to antiretroviral therapy are consistent with electronic data and virological treatment outcome. AIDS.2002;16:269-77

    Measured at each clinical visit over 18 months of participation

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Viral Load Count

    Measured over 18 months

Study Arms (2)

Control

OTHER

Participants will receive the control condition

Other: Control

Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will receive the LifeWindows Intervention sessions

Behavioral: LifeWindows Intervention Sessions

Interventions

At each clinical care visit, intervention arm participants use the full LifeWindows program, which includes welcome and assessment surveys and also includes the active intervention modules. ART adherence promotion intervention activities are tailored to the participant's assessment responses. Participants select which activities he or she wishes to use which culminates in an adherence specific goal.

Intervention
ControlOTHER

At each clinical care visit, control arm participants use the portion of the LifeWindows software program that provides a welcome from the avatar and collection of assessment items/surveys.

Control

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • HIV-infected
  • English-speaking
  • Currently receiving treatment at one of the participating sites
  • Currently receiving antiretroviral therapy

You may not qualify if:

  • Marked cognitive impairment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

University of Connecticut Health Center

Farmington, Connecticut, 06030-3212, United States

Location

Hartford Hospital

Hartford, Connecticut, 06102, United States

Location

Yale-New Haven Hospital Nathan Smith Clinic

New Haven, Connecticut, 06510, United States

Location

Hospital of Saint Raphael

New Haven, Connecticut, 06511, United States

Location

Waterbury Hospital

Waterbury, Connecticut, 06708, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Fisher JD, Amico KR, Fisher WA, Cornman DH, Shuper PA, Trayling C, Redding C, Barta W, Lemieux AF, Altice FL, Dieckhaus K, Friedland G; LifeWindows Team. Computer-based intervention in HIV clinical care setting improves antiretroviral adherence: the LifeWindows Project. AIDS Behav. 2011 Nov;15(8):1635-46. doi: 10.1007/s10461-011-9926-x.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Health BehaviorAcquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

BehaviorHIV InfectionsBlood-Borne InfectionsCommunicable DiseasesInfectionsSexually Transmitted Diseases, ViralSexually Transmitted DiseasesLentivirus InfectionsRetroviridae InfectionsRNA Virus InfectionsVirus DiseasesSlow Virus DiseasesGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesImmunologic Deficiency SyndromesImmune System Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

* The only empirical demonstration of LifeWindows outcomes to date * OP sample was defined a posteriori * Under-powered to detect changes in Viral Load

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Jeffrey Fisher, Principal Investigator
Organization
Center for Health, Intervention & Prevention

Study Officials

  • Jeffrey D. Fisher, PhD

    University of Connecticut

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • K. Rivet Amico*, PhD

    University of Connecticut (*co-PI)

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Deborah H. Cornman*, PhD

    University of Connecticut (*co-PI)

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • William A. Fisher*, PhD

    University of Western Ontario (*co-PI)

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 31, 2005

First Posted

November 2, 2005

Study Start

October 1, 2005

Primary Completion

March 1, 2008

Study Completion

March 1, 2008

Last Updated

December 20, 2013

Results First Posted

December 20, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-11

Locations