Safety and Efficacy Study of rEV131 in Allergic Rhinitis
Two Center Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Nasal rEV131 Versus rEV131 Vehicle (Placebo)in the Prevention of the Signs and Symptoms of Allergic Rhinitis Induced by Nasal Allergen Challenge
1 other identifier
interventional
112
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to see whether rEV131 when given as a nasal spray in a single dose to each nostril is safe and can reduce the signs and symptoms of allergic rhinitis (hay fever) caused by an allergen challenge. All patients enrolled will be known to be allergic to ragweed pollen and will be given ragweed pollen extract in both nostrils 30 minutes after either rEV131 or innactive vehicle (placebo). The signs and symptoms (sneezing, itching, stuffiness and runny nose) will each be given a score from 0 to 3 by the patient and these will be added together and the combined scores from patients treated with rEV131 will be compared with those who received placebo.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started May 2005
Shorter than P25 for phase_1
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2005
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 2, 2005
CompletedNovember 2, 2005
November 1, 2005
November 1, 2005
November 1, 2005
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Sum of symptom scores at 15 minutes post allergen challenge
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Sum of symptom scores at 30 and 45 minutes post allergen challenge
Individual symptom scores at 15, 30 and 45 minutes post challenge
Pre and post treatment responder analysis
Change in nasal volume as assessed by acoustic rhinometry
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- a) Have a known past history of allergic rhinitis including allergy to ragweed pollen.
- b) Able and willing to give informed consent. c) Able and willing to follow all study related instructions. d) Able and willing to make all required visits. e) Aged between 18 and 80 years. f) Willing to avoid prohibited medications (see below). g) Has met at least one of the endpoints to allergen challenge at Visit 1
- Total symptom score of at least 6 OR
- ≥ 30% reduction in nasal volume in at least one side of the nose as measured by acoustic rhinometry AND total symptom score of at least 4.
- h) Has met endpoint to allergen challenge at Visit 2: Total symptom score of at least 4 from a possible total of 12.
You may not qualify if:
- a) Patients with known exaggerated immuogenicity responses including severe asthma or peanut allergy.
- b) Patients with known allergy to ticks or severe reaction to arthropod venom (e.g. bee or wasp venom).
- c) Patients with known chronic sinusitis, deviated nasal septum or nasal polyposis.
- d) Patients having a total Baseline symptom score of \>4 at Visit 1 (ie before the first nasal washout).
- e) Patients known or found to be allergic to pollens prevalent in the trial site locality during the period of the study (e.g. mountain cedar).
- f) Patients who have taken systemic or topical corticosteroids, long acting antihistamines or immunosuppressives within 4 weeks of selection (V1) or who take them within the course of the trial. Loratidine may not be taken within 10 days of entry. Short acting antihistamines may not be taken within 72 hours of entry except as comfort medication following nasal allergen challenge (oral antihistamines only). Patients excluded from the study for non-compliance with regard to prohibited medications but who have received one or more doses of the test medications will be included in the safety analysis.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Evolutec Grouplead
Study Sites (2)
Diagnostics Research Group
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
Sylvana Research Associates
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Wynne H Weston-Davies, MB FRCS
Evolutec Group plc
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 1, 2005
First Posted
November 2, 2005
Study Start
May 1, 2005
Study Completion
August 1, 2005
Last Updated
November 2, 2005
Record last verified: 2005-11