A Randomized Double-Blind Comparison of Combined General-Spinal Anesthesia to General Anesthesia for Coronary Artery Surgery
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
63
1 country
1
Study Start
April 2002
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Primary Completion
Not reported
Date not reportedStudy Completion
July 2003
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Use of neuraxial agents in anesthesia for cardiac surgery is expanding. We have used combined general-spinal anesthesia for cardiac surgery for 12 years. We hypothesized that compared to general anesthesia, the combined techniques would provide comparable intraoperative hemodynamics and improved postoperative analgesia. This study subjected these techniques to a double-blind randomized trial.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
July 2003
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
April 2002
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
July 2003
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
October 19, 2005
Actual (reported)October 20, 2005
Actual (reported)analgesic requirement in the intensive care unit
visual analogue pain scores in the intensive care unit
duration of endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit
intraoperative hemodynamic variables
intraoperative blood catecholamine and lactate levels
intraoperative anesthetic supplementation
intraoperative vasoactive drug therapy
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Foothills Medical Centre
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9, Canada
MacAdams, CL et al. Combined general-spinal vs spinal anesthesia for coronary artery bypass grafting. Can J Anesth 73(Suppl I):A73,2003.
Charles L MacAdams, MD FRCPC
Department of Anesthesia, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary
First Submitted
October 19, 2005
First Posted
October 20, 2005
Study Start
April 2002
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Study Completion
July 2003
Date type not reportedContact the study team to confirm eligibility.
This date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Last Updated
October 20, 2005
Record last verified: 2005-10
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: