Efficacy and Safety Comparison of Tiotropium Inhalation Solution (Respimat Inhaler) and Spiriva HandiHaler in COPD
1 other identifier
interventional
131
2 countries
11
Brief Summary
Non-inferiority of lung function response to Tiotropium inhalation solution compared to Spiriva HandiHaler
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Nov 2002
11 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 26, 2002
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 29, 2004
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 29, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 14, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 17, 2005
CompletedDecember 1, 2023
November 1, 2023
1.4 years
October 14, 2005
November 30, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Trough FEV1 response determined at the end of each 4-week period of randomised treatment.
at the end of each 4-week period
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Tiotropium plasma concentration data and urinary excretion data
at the end of each 4-week period
Trough forced vital capacity (FVC) response
after 4 weeks
Peak response (FEV1 and FVC)
within 3 hours after first dose, after 4 weeks
FEV1 AUC 0-12h and FVC AUC 0-12h response
after 4 weeks
FEV1 AUC 0-3h and FVC AUC 0-3h response
after the first dose, after 4 weeks
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients had to sign an informed consent consistent with International Conference of Harmonization-Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) guidelines prior to participation in the trial, which includes medication washout and restrictions.
- All patients had to have a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
- Patients had to have relatively stable, moderate to severe airway obstruction with an forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) ≤ 60% of predicted normal and FEV1 ≤ 70% of forced vital capacity FVC (Visits 1 and 2).
- Male or female patients 40 years of age or older.
- Patients had to be current or ex-smokers with a smoking history of more than 10 pack-years.
- Patients had to be able to perform technically acceptable pulmonary function tests and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) measurements, and had to be able to maintain records (Patient Daily Diary Card) during the study period as required in the protocol.
- Patients had to be able to inhale medication in a competent manner from the Respimat inhaler, the HandiHaler and from a metered dose inhaler (MDI).
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with significant diseases other than chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) had to be excluded. A significant disease was defined as a disease which in the opinion of the investigator may either put the patient at risk because of participation in the study or a disease which may influence the results of the study or the patient's ability to participate in the study.
- Patients with a recent history (i.e., one year or less) of myocardial infarction.
- Patients with any cardiac arrhythmia requiring drug therapy or who had been hospitalised for heart failure within the past three years.
- Patients with a history of cancer within the last five years. Patients with treated basal cell carcinoma were allowed.
- Patients with known symptomatic prostatic hypertrophy or bladder neck obstruction.
- Patients with known narrow-angle glaucoma.
- Patients with a history of asthma, allergic rhinitis or who have a total blood eosinophil count ≥600 mm3.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (11)
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205, United States
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
San Diego, California, 92120, United States
San Jose Clinical Research
San Jose, California, 95128, United States
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Stockton, California, 95207, United States
National Jewish Medical and Research Center
Denver, Colorado, 80206-2762, United States
LSU MC-Sheveport
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71103, United States
Minisota Lung Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55407, United States
Wake Forest University School of Medicine
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
Spartanburg Medical Research
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303, United States
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Tacoma, Washington, 98405, United States
Montreal Chest Institute - McGill University Health Centre
Montreal, Quebec, H2X 2P4, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Boehringer Ingelheim Study Coordinator
Boehringer Ingelheim BV/Alkmaar
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 14, 2005
First Posted
October 17, 2005
Study Start
November 26, 2002
Primary Completion
April 29, 2004
Study Completion
April 29, 2004
Last Updated
December 1, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11