Comparing Different Ways of Delivering Humidity to Children With Croup
Efficacy of Optimal Versus 'Traditional' Delivery of Humidity in Children With Croup
1 other identifier
interventional
129
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Croup affects 5% of children under 6 years of age, resulting in visits to hospital Emergency Departments, and in 1% of children, hospitalization. Traditionally, the first therapy offered is humidification which can liquify airway secretions and decrease airway swelling. This study will compare the effectivenesss of 40% and 100% humidity through a specially designed machine called a nebulizer, with the usual humidity set-up (blown into the patient's face from a hose).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Sep 2001
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2001
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 29, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 3, 2005
CompletedAugust 2, 2013
July 1, 2013
September 29, 2005
July 31, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
changes in the croup score from baseline to 30 and 60 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (3)
steroid or epinephrine treatment at 60 minutes
discharge rate at 60 minutes
change in pulse, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation at 60 minutes
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- children aged 3 months - 10 years
- croup score greater than or equal to 2 after a 30 minute waiting period
You may not qualify if:
- Symptoms of croup requiring immediate intervention with nebulized epinephrine or intubation
- symptoms or signs of alternative causes of stridor
- inability of caregivers to understand or speak English and/or sign for informed consent
- history of chronic pulmonary disease except for asthma, or co-existent systemic disease
- previous history of intubation
- duration of present illness \>1 week
- systemic or inhaled glucocorticoids in previous 48 hours
- epinephrine in previous 4 hours
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Hospital for Sick Children
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Scolnik D, Coates AL, Stephens D, Da Silva Z, Lavine E, Schuh S. Controlled delivery of high vs low humidity vs mist therapy for croup in emergency departments: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006 Mar 15;295(11):1274-80. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.11.1274.
PMID: 16537737RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dennis Scolnik, MD
The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto Canada
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Staff Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 29, 2005
First Posted
October 3, 2005
Study Start
September 1, 2001
Study Completion
April 1, 2004
Last Updated
August 2, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-07