Comparison of Diuretic-based With Non-diuretic Based Hypertension Therapy Using Echocardiographic Measures
1 other identifier
interventional
38
1 country
1
Brief Summary
MAIN: The benefits of treating high blood pressure successfully to normal levels on heart function are the same regardless of which particular combination of drugs are used. SECONDARY: Measurement of heart function using a comprehensive ultrasound imaging method (Echocardiography) and an objective test of functional ability are better predictors of changes in heart function with successful hypertension treatment, than subjective signs of heart failure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable hypertension
Started Nov 2003
Typical duration for not_applicable hypertension
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2003
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 13, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 29, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2007
CompletedDecember 14, 2009
December 1, 2009
3.1 years
September 13, 2005
December 11, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Measurement of systolic and diastolic function in responders to therapy
0, 3 and 6 months
LV mass in responders
0, 3 and 6 months
Change in 6-minute walk distance in responders
0, 3, and 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Correlation between interval improvement or deterioration in Framingham score and corresponding change in echocardiographic classification in all subjects
3 and 6 months
Correlation between interval improvement or deterioration in LV Mass and corresponding change in 6 minute walk distance and diastolic function in all subjects
3 and 6 months
Study Arms (2)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATORDiuretic-Based Hypertension Therapy
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORNon-Diuretic-Based Hypertension Therapy
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 20-65 years;
- Hypertension with average 24-hour BP of \>130 mmHg systolic or \>80 mmHg diastolic in spite of treatment with one medication;
- Office systolic blood pressure \>140 mmHg and less than 180mmHg;
- Able to comprehend and sign the consent form;
- Able to tolerate either hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg or amlodipine 5 mg daily for 3 weeks during the run-in phase.
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosis of secondary hypertension;
- Hypertension with systolic BP \>180 mmHg in spite of 1 medication;
- Chronic heart failure requiring diuretics, Angina or coronary syndrome requiring anti-angina therapy with CCB or beta blockers, or more than 0.4 mg/hr nitroglycerine patch;
- Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) \<20% or LV end systolic dimension \>75 mm;
- Significant valvular disease such as; more than mild disease of aortic or mitral valve;
- Technically sub-optimal acoustic window or regional wall motion abnormalities;
- Patients currently on both CCB and diuretics for more than 4 weeks;
- Normal 24 hour ABPM at the end of the run-in period;
- Physical handicap that precludes adequate performance of 6-minute walk such as arthritis;
- Concomitant comorbidity that might compromise ability to evaluate treatment or enhance risks of therapy, such as: atrial fibrillation with resting ventricular rate of \>100 bpm; morbid obesity; uncontrolled diabetes mellitus; severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; and documented history of non-compliance with treatment;
- Any condition or disorder other than hypertension that: Requires prolonged hospitalization; May limit life expectancy within 2 years; would increase the risk of participation to the subject (in the opinion of the investigator).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Queen's Universitylead
- Pfizercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Kingston General Hospital
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 2V7, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Ogunyankin KO, Day AG. Successful treatment of hypertension accounts for improvements in markers of diastolic function - a pilot study comparing hydrochlorothiazide-based and amlodipine-based treatment strategies. Can J Cardiol. 2009 Dec;25(12):e406-12. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(09)70534-3.
PMID: 19960134RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kofo O Ogunyankin, MD, FACC
Queen's University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 13, 2005
First Posted
September 29, 2005
Study Start
November 1, 2003
Primary Completion
December 1, 2006
Study Completion
March 1, 2007
Last Updated
December 14, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-12