Clinical Performance of 3-Unit FPDs
Clinical Performance of Three-Unit Fixed Partial Dentures (FPDs) Made From a Hot-Pressed Ceramic (Five-Year Study)
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Objectives: The purpose of this research was to determine the clinical success rate of a lithia-disilicate-based core ceramic (Ivoclar, Vivadent Corp.) for use in posterior fixed partial dentures (FPDs) as a function of bite force, cement type, connector height, and connector width. Methods: Thirty ceramic FPD core frameworks were prepared using a hot-pressing technique and a lithia-disilicate-based core ceramic. The maximum clenching force was measured for each patient prior to tooth preparation. Connector heights and widths were measured for each FPD. Patients were recalled yearly after cementation for two years and evaluated using eleven clinical criteria. All FPDs were examined by two independent clinicians and rankings for each criterion were made from 1 to 4 with 4 = excellent and 1 = unacceptable. The aims of this research were:
- 1.To test the hypotheses that three-unit fixed partial dentures (FPDs) of a high-strength core ceramic will exhibit good-to-excellent clinical performance (based on 11 evaluative criteria) and that they will adequately resist fracture in posterior situations (excluding third molars) if fabricated with the minimal connector size (4 mm x 4 mm).
- 2.To test the hypothesis that a reinforced glass ionomer cement (ProTec CEM, Ivoclar, Vivadent), when used to cement core ceramic crowns in posterior FPDs, will be associated with significantly less marginal quality, but similar fracture resistance of the ceramic crowns compared with the marginal quality associated with a dual cure resin cement (Variolink® II, Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein).
- 3.To test the hypothesis that there is no significant difference in tooth sensitivity associated with FPDs cemented with the glass ionomer cement and dual-cure resin cement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Feb 1998
Longer than P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 1998
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 13, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 22, 2005
CompletedSeptember 22, 2005
September 1, 2005
September 13, 2005
September 13, 2005
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
clinical performance
improved esthetics
improved occlusal function of a lithia disilicate based core ceramic. Performance was measured yearly for 4 years.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
wear of opposing enamel
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- missing posterior tooth in a quadrant (first premolars through second molars) that could be restored with a 3-unit FPD
- periodontal pockets of less than 4 mm for each abutment with no periodontal disease
- vital abutment teeth
- crown root ratio of at least 1:1.
You may not qualify if:
- individuals with medical contraindications to dental treatment
- parafunctional habits
- inability to ensure residence in the area for the next five years
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Florida College of Dentistry
Gainesville, Florida, 32610, United States
Related Publications (2)
Esquivel-Upshaw JF, Anusavice KJ, Young H, Jones J, Gibbs C. Clinical performance of a lithia disilicate-based core ceramic for three-unit posterior FPDs. Int J Prosthodont. 2004 Jul-Aug;17(4):469-75.
PMID: 15382785RESULTGibbs CH, Anusavice KJ, Young HM, Jones JS, Esquivel-Upshaw JF. Maximum clenching force of patients with moderate loss of posterior tooth support: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Nov;88(5):498-502. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.129062.
PMID: 12473999RESULT
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kenneth J Anusavice, PhD, DMD
University of Florida
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 13, 2005
First Posted
September 22, 2005
Study Start
February 1, 1998
Study Completion
May 1, 2004
Last Updated
September 22, 2005
Record last verified: 2005-09