Electrogastrogram (EGG) Reproducibility Study: EEG Readings in Normal Subjects and Dyspeptic Patients
Reproducibility and Inter-Reader Reliability of Electrogastrographic Readings in Normal Subjects and Dyspeptic Patients
Reproducibility and Inter-Reader Reliability of Electrogastrographic Readings in Normal Subjects and Dyspeptic Patients
Sponsor study identifier
observational
40
1 country
1
Study Start
August 2005
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
August 2006
Actual (reported)Study Completion
September 2006
Actual (reported)The primary objective of this study is to determine whether EGG readings obtained from both normal subjects and dyspeptic patients are reproducible from one EGG recording to another on a different day. The secondary objective of this study is to determine whether the EGG readings are analyzed and diagnosed consistently when reviewed and compared by multiple blinded readers when the same tracing is reviewed.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
September 2006
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
August 2005
Actual (reported)September 19, 2005
Actual (reported)September 22, 2005
Actual (reported)August 2006
Actual (reported)September 2006
Actual (reported)Temple University School of Medicine
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140, United States
Henry P Parkman, MD
Temple University
First Submitted
September 19, 2005
First Posted
September 22, 2005
Study Start
August 2005
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
August 2006
Actual (reported)To Evaluate the Efficacy of Z-338 in Subjects With Functional Dyspepsia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Study Completion
September 2006
Actual (reported)Last Updated
August 17, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-08
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: