Divalproex Sodium vs. Placebo in Childhood/Adolescent Autism
2 other identifiers
interventional
27
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study is designed to assess the efficacy of treatment with divalproex sodium (DS) vs. placebo in childhood/adolescent autism fulfilling DSM-IV and Autism Diagnostic Interview (ADI) criteria. Currently, there are no FDA-approved treatments for this disorder, although behavioral and educational therapies and a variety of medications may play a role in the management of some autistic symptoms.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Sep 2002
Longer than P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2002
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 13, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 21, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 6, 2018
CompletedOctober 28, 2024
October 1, 2024
5.8 years
September 13, 2005
May 29, 2018
October 16, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of Participants Reporting Improvement on the Clinical Global Impression
The CGI-I is a 7-point improvement scale. Ratings of 1 or 2 (responders) indicate a substantial reduction in symptoms. A rating of 3 (minimally improved) on the CGI is defined as a slight symptomatic improvement that is not deemed clinically significant; patients with such an improvement were not considered responders. Two versions of this test were used, one focused on irritability (primary outcome measure) and a general version CGI-I-autism focused on all symptoms including core symptom domains. The CGI-I irritability took into consideration the scores from the ABC-Irritability subscale, the OAS-M aggression and irritability subscales and information from open-ended questioning related to the degree of interference, nature, and range of behavioral problems at school and at home
Baseline to end of study (week 15)
Change in Aberrant Behaviors as Measured by the Aberrant Behavior Checklist Scores
The Aberrant Behavior Checklist is designed to objectively identify five behavior sub scales through observation by the primary caregiver: irritability, lethargy, stereotypy, hyperactivity, and inappropriate speech. The ABC was filled out by parents on a scale from 0-3 for each category. (0 being not a problem, 3 being severe problem). Scores from all sub scales were added (scoring 0-45 for Irritability subscale, 0-48 for Lethargy subscale, 0-21 for stereotypy scale, 0-48 for hyperactivity sub-scale, and 0-12 for inappropriate speech sub-scale) to obtain an overall score with a an overall scoring range of 0-174. Higher scores were indicative of worsening symptoms.
Baseline and End of Study (week 15)
Study Arms (2)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORSubjects in this arm will receive a placebo comparative to the study drug divalproex sodium.
Divalproex Sodium
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will receive the study drug, divalproex sodium.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects with overall adaptive behavior scores below the age of two years on the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Rating Scale.
- Subjects with active or unstable epilepsy.
- Subjects with any of the following past or present mental disorders: schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or organic mental disorders.
- Subjects who are a serious suicidal risk.
- Subjects with clinically significant or unstable medical illness that would contraindicate participation in the study, including hematopoietic or cardiovascular disease, pancreatitis, liver toxicity, and polycystic ovary syndrome.
- Subjects reporting history of encephalitis, phenylketonuria, tuberous sclerosis, fragile X syndrome, anoxia during birth, pica, neurofibromatosis, hypomelanosis of Ito, hypothyroidism, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, and maternal rubella.
- Patients with history of the following:
- gastrointestinal, liver, or kidney, or other known conditions which will presently interfere presently with the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of drugs; cerebrovascular disease or brain trauma; clinically significant unstable endocrine disorder, such as hypo- or hyperthyroidism; recent history or presence of any form of malignancy
- Treatment within the previous 30 days with any drug known to a well-defined potential for toxicity to a major organ
- Subjects with clinically significant abnormalities in laboratory tests or physical exam.
- Subjects likely to require ECT or any other psychotropic medication during the study, unless otherwise permitted.
- Subjects unable to tolerate taper from psychoactive medication if necessary.
- Subjects with a history of hypersensitivity or severe side effects associated with the use of divalproex sodium, or other an ineffective prior therapeutic trial of divalproex sodium (serum levels within range of 50-100 ug/ml for 6 weeks).
- Subjects who have received any of the following interventions within the prescribed period before starting treatment:
- investigational drugs within the previous 30 days; depot neuroleptic medication; psychotropic drugs not permitted for concurrent use in the study within the previous seven days; fluoxetine within the previous five weeks.
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
New York, New York, 10029, United States
Related Publications (1)
Iffland M, Livingstone N, Jorgensen M, Hazell P, Gillies D. Pharmacological intervention for irritability, aggression, and self-injury in autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 9;10(10):CD011769. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011769.pub2.
PMID: 37811711DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Eric Hollander
- Organization
- Montefiore Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eric Hollander
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 13, 2005
First Posted
September 21, 2005
Study Start
September 1, 2002
Primary Completion
July 1, 2008
Study Completion
July 1, 2008
Last Updated
October 28, 2024
Results First Posted
December 6, 2018
Record last verified: 2024-10