Study Stopped
Supported by preliminary interim analysis. Not based on any safety signals in study or any quality issues that could affect efficacy of the product.
Renal Effects of Two Iodinated Contrast Media in Patients at Risk Undergoing Computed Tomography
GEHC Has Decided Not to Provide This Detail But Will Rely on the Brief Title.
1 other identifier
interventional
656
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
It is well known that X-ray contrast media can affect kidney function in some patients, especially when administered intra-arterially, and patients who already suffer from reduced kidney function and diabetes mellitus may be at increased risk. It is widely accepted to use low-osmolar or iso-osmolar contrast media, especially in patients at risk for contrast media-induced nephropathy. However, little is known about the intravenous use of X-ray contrast media in risk patients, such as contrast-enhanced CT examinations. The main purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the effects on kidney function of two contrast media, the iso-osmolar iodixanol and the low-osmolar iopamidol in patients at risk of kidney damage associated with the injection of contrast media. Due to the iso-osmolar feature, it is expected less influence on renal function following administration of iodixanol. A standard hydration procedure, based on available guidelines will be given to all patients to prevent negative effects on the kidneys. Serum creatinine (SCr ) concentrations will be measured before and up to 7 days after contrast media administration to evaluate the effects on renal function.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Jun 2005
Longer than P75 for phase_4
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 24, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 21, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 10, 2014
CompletedOctober 17, 2014
October 1, 2014
5.9 years
August 24, 2005
October 2, 2014
October 9, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Assessment of the Incidence Rate of Contrast Medium-Induced Nephropathy (CIN) Between Iodixanol and Iopamidol in Patients With Impaired Renal Function.
The primary endpoint was the incidence rate of CIN, defined as an intra-individual increase in serum creatinine (SCr) of greater than or equal to 44.2 µmol/L (greater than or equal to 0.5 mg/dL). Subjects with a pre-contrast (baseline) serum creatinine value greater than or equal to 1.5 mg/dL for males and greater than or equal to 1.3 mg/dL for females or eGFR of less than or equal to 50 mL/min/1.73m squared, and a post-contrast serum creatinine value available on days 2 or 3, administered greater than or equal to100 mL or greater than or equal to 1.5 mL/kg bodyweight IMP, without presence of any major protocol violations, and without evidence of other causes inducing acute renal dysfunction.
From baseline up to 3 days post contrast administration.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Assessment of Overall Image Quality Between Iodixanol and Iopamidol in Patients Undergoing Contrast-enhanced Multi-detector-row Helical Computed Tomography (MDCT) Examination.
Within 2, 3 and 7 days post contrast administration.
Study Arms (2)
Iodixanol 320-Arm 1
ACTIVE COMPARATORIodixanol 320 mg I/mL
Iopamidol 300-Arm 2
ACTIVE COMPARATORIopamidol 300 mg I/mL
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with a combination of diabetes mellitus (type I or II) and renal impairment who are referred for a contrast-enhanced CT examination.
You may not qualify if:
- Concurrent administration of potentially nephroprotective or nephrotoxic drugs is not permitted.
- Patients undergoing dialysis or kidney transplantation will not be included.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- GE Healthcarelead
- ABX CROcollaborator
- Examination Management Services Inc.collaborator
- Covancecollaborator
- Quintiles, Inc.collaborator
- Averion International Corporationcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
GE Healthcare
Princeton, New Jersey, 08540, United States
GE Healthcare
Amersham, HP7 9LL, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Paul Gordon, PhD
- Organization
- GE Healthcare
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Judith A Johnson, MS, MBA
GE Healthcare
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 24, 2005
First Posted
September 21, 2005
Study Start
June 1, 2005
Primary Completion
May 1, 2011
Study Completion
July 1, 2011
Last Updated
October 17, 2014
Results First Posted
October 10, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-10