NCT00208494

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of artificial hips with metal heads and metal sockets to artificial hips with ceramic heads articulating with metal socket components. The success of the total hip arthroplasty (THA) will be based upon all of the following clinical and radiographic criteria being met at the two-year evaluation: (1) the patient's clinical results as measured using modified Harris Hip evaluation rating system, and the absence of a complication that requires the surgical removal or replacement of a component; and (2) radiographic findings at study endpoint (i.e., two years follow-up). Clinical and radiographic success at two (2) years postoperative is required for the study hip to be deemed successful.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
392

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2005

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
2 countries

9 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2005

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 13, 2005

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 21, 2005

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2008

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2011

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 4, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

August 14, 2013

Status Verified

August 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

3.3 years

First QC Date

September 13, 2005

Results QC Date

July 11, 2011

Last Update Submit

August 6, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

Non-Inflammatory Degenerative Joint Disease

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Composite Success/Failure

    The composite success/failure of the implant was made up of radiographic, clinical and revision data. Radiographic success was determined by femoral subsidence =/\< 2mm, acetabular migration =/\< 2mm, cup inclination =/\< 4°, no acetabular or femoral osteolysis, and acetabular and femoral lucencies less than 50% of visible porous coating. Clinical success was determined by a Harris Hip score equal to or greater than 80. A hip (patient) was considered to be a composite success at study endpoint if it was a radiographic and clinical success and no revision of any component had taken place.

    At 24 months

Study Arms (2)

A

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Ceramic-on-metal total hip implant

Device: Total Hip Replacement

B

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Metal-on-metal total hip implant

Device: Total hip replacement

Interventions

Total hip replacement

Also known as: Biolox Delta head; Ultamet insert; Pinnacle Acetabular shell
A

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Able to (or capable of) provide consent to participate in the clinical investigation prior to the day of the surgery.
  • Skeletally mature (tibial and femoral epiphyses are closed)
  • Undergoing cementless primary hip replacement surgery for Noninflammatory Degenerative Joint Disease
  • Affected hip has a Harris Hip Score of 70 or lower and a Pain rating of Moderate or greater
  • Radiographic Parameters:
  • X-Ray Evaluation confirms the presence of NIDJD
  • Femoral and acetabular bone stock is sufficient, regarding strength and shape, and is suitable to receive the implants
  • No structural bone grafts required to support to prosthetic component(s)or to shape the bone to receive implant(s)
  • Willing to have knowledge of treatment arm (CoM or MoM) withheld for a period of 24 months post-operatively unless disclosure is legally and/or medically necessary
  • Previous THA in contralateral hip that is greater than one (1) year postoperative and has a Harris Hip pain rating less than MILD

You may not qualify if:

  • Bilateral hip disease with the anticipated need for bilateral hip implant during study participation (i.e., within the next 24 months)
  • THA required for the revision of a previously failed THA
  • Suffering from inflammatory arthritis
  • Prior prosthetic hip replacement
  • Previous Girdlestone procedure or surgical fusion in the operative hip joint
  • Above knee amputation of either the contralateral or ipsilateral leg
  • Known allergy to metal (e.g. jewelry)
  • The presence of highly communicable disease or diseases that may limit follow-up (e.g., immuno-compromised conditions, hepatitis, active tuberculosis, etc.)
  • Significant neurological or musculoskeletal disorders or disease that may adversely affect gait or weight bearing (e.g., muscular dystrophy, multiple sclerosis)
  • Conditions that may interfere with the total hip arthroplasty survival or outcome (e.g., Paget's disease, Charcot's disease)
  • Unwilling or unable to comply with a rehabilitation program for a cementless THA or difficulty or inability to return for follow-up visits prescribed by the study protocol
  • Known to be pregnant, a prisoner, mentally incompetent, and/or alcohol or drug abuser
  • Previous treatment for renal disease
  • Any systemic steroid therapy, excluding inhalers, within three months prior to surgery

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (9)

Foundation for Musculoskeletal Research and Education

Little Rock, Arkansas, 72203, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Orange, California, 92868, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Palm Bay, Florida, 32905, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Cincinnati, Ohio, 45236, United States

Location

Anderson Clinic

Alexandria, Virginia, 22306, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Roanoke, Virginia, 24018, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Spokane, Washington, 99218, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

London, Ontario, N6A 5A5, Canada

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arthroplasty, ReplacementArthroplastyOrthopedic ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativePlastic Surgery ProceduresProsthesis Implantation

Results Point of Contact

Title
Jennifer Hoag, MS, Project Leader, Clinical Research
Organization
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.

Study Officials

  • David Scott, MD

    Orthopaedic Specialty Clinic

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Patrick G Kirk, MD

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Shekhar S Desai, MD

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Charles A Engh, Jr., MD

    Anderson Clinic

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Ajai Cadambi, MD

    Adult Orthopaedic Reconstruction Texas Hip and Knee Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • C L Barnes, MD

    Foundation for Musculoskeletal Research & Education

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
LTE60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2005

First Posted

September 21, 2005

Study Start

August 1, 2005

Primary Completion

December 1, 2008

Study Completion

June 1, 2011

Last Updated

August 14, 2013

Results First Posted

August 4, 2011

Record last verified: 2013-08

Locations