Metal on Metal Versus Ceramic on Metal Hip Replacement
Comparative Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the DePuy Ceramic-on-metal Total Hip Prosthesis Versus the DePuy Metal-on-metal Total Hip Prosthesis Through Clinical and Radiographical Data
1 other identifier
interventional
392
2 countries
9
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of artificial hips with metal heads and metal sockets to artificial hips with ceramic heads articulating with metal socket components. The success of the total hip arthroplasty (THA) will be based upon all of the following clinical and radiographic criteria being met at the two-year evaluation: (1) the patient's clinical results as measured using modified Harris Hip evaluation rating system, and the absence of a complication that requires the surgical removal or replacement of a component; and (2) radiographic findings at study endpoint (i.e., two years follow-up). Clinical and radiographic success at two (2) years postoperative is required for the study hip to be deemed successful.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2005
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 13, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 21, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 4, 2011
CompletedAugust 14, 2013
August 1, 2013
3.3 years
September 13, 2005
July 11, 2011
August 6, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Composite Success/Failure
The composite success/failure of the implant was made up of radiographic, clinical and revision data. Radiographic success was determined by femoral subsidence =/\< 2mm, acetabular migration =/\< 2mm, cup inclination =/\< 4°, no acetabular or femoral osteolysis, and acetabular and femoral lucencies less than 50% of visible porous coating. Clinical success was determined by a Harris Hip score equal to or greater than 80. A hip (patient) was considered to be a composite success at study endpoint if it was a radiographic and clinical success and no revision of any component had taken place.
At 24 months
Study Arms (2)
A
ACTIVE COMPARATORCeramic-on-metal total hip implant
B
ACTIVE COMPARATORMetal-on-metal total hip implant
Interventions
Total hip replacement
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Able to (or capable of) provide consent to participate in the clinical investigation prior to the day of the surgery.
- Skeletally mature (tibial and femoral epiphyses are closed)
- Undergoing cementless primary hip replacement surgery for Noninflammatory Degenerative Joint Disease
- Affected hip has a Harris Hip Score of 70 or lower and a Pain rating of Moderate or greater
- Radiographic Parameters:
- X-Ray Evaluation confirms the presence of NIDJD
- Femoral and acetabular bone stock is sufficient, regarding strength and shape, and is suitable to receive the implants
- No structural bone grafts required to support to prosthetic component(s)or to shape the bone to receive implant(s)
- Willing to have knowledge of treatment arm (CoM or MoM) withheld for a period of 24 months post-operatively unless disclosure is legally and/or medically necessary
- Previous THA in contralateral hip that is greater than one (1) year postoperative and has a Harris Hip pain rating less than MILD
You may not qualify if:
- Bilateral hip disease with the anticipated need for bilateral hip implant during study participation (i.e., within the next 24 months)
- THA required for the revision of a previously failed THA
- Suffering from inflammatory arthritis
- Prior prosthetic hip replacement
- Previous Girdlestone procedure or surgical fusion in the operative hip joint
- Above knee amputation of either the contralateral or ipsilateral leg
- Known allergy to metal (e.g. jewelry)
- The presence of highly communicable disease or diseases that may limit follow-up (e.g., immuno-compromised conditions, hepatitis, active tuberculosis, etc.)
- Significant neurological or musculoskeletal disorders or disease that may adversely affect gait or weight bearing (e.g., muscular dystrophy, multiple sclerosis)
- Conditions that may interfere with the total hip arthroplasty survival or outcome (e.g., Paget's disease, Charcot's disease)
- Unwilling or unable to comply with a rehabilitation program for a cementless THA or difficulty or inability to return for follow-up visits prescribed by the study protocol
- Known to be pregnant, a prisoner, mentally incompetent, and/or alcohol or drug abuser
- Previous treatment for renal disease
- Any systemic steroid therapy, excluding inhalers, within three months prior to surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (9)
Foundation for Musculoskeletal Research and Education
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72203, United States
Unknown Facility
Orange, California, 92868, United States
Unknown Facility
Palm Bay, Florida, 32905, United States
Unknown Facility
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207, United States
Unknown Facility
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45236, United States
Anderson Clinic
Alexandria, Virginia, 22306, United States
Unknown Facility
Roanoke, Virginia, 24018, United States
Unknown Facility
Spokane, Washington, 99218, United States
Unknown Facility
London, Ontario, N6A 5A5, Canada
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jennifer Hoag, MS, Project Leader, Clinical Research
- Organization
- DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Scott, MD
Orthopaedic Specialty Clinic
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Patrick G Kirk, MD
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shekhar S Desai, MD
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Charles A Engh, Jr., MD
Anderson Clinic
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ajai Cadambi, MD
Adult Orthopaedic Reconstruction Texas Hip and Knee Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
C L Barnes, MD
Foundation for Musculoskeletal Research & Education
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 13, 2005
First Posted
September 21, 2005
Study Start
August 1, 2005
Primary Completion
December 1, 2008
Study Completion
June 1, 2011
Last Updated
August 14, 2013
Results First Posted
August 4, 2011
Record last verified: 2013-08