NCT00201968

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether an aerobic and resistance training program or a functional electrical stimulation-assisted Walking program is more effective for reducing health complications related to spinal cord injury, for example, the occurrence of bladder infections, pressure sores and/or frequency of spasms. It is hypothesized that the functional electrical stimulation-assisted walking will have a greater impact on secondary complications than the aerobic and resistance training program.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
32

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2005

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2005

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 12, 2005

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 20, 2005

Completed
7.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

February 27, 2013

Status Verified

February 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

8 years

First QC Date

September 12, 2005

Last Update Submit

February 25, 2013

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Whole body muscle mass via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry

    Baseline, 4 month and 12 months

  • Bone density at different hip, spine, proximal and distal femur and proximal Tibia using dual-energy xray absorptiometry

    Baseline, 4 month and 12 months

  • Bone density, bone geometry and muscle area via computed tomography,

    Baseline, 4 month and 12 months

  • Spasticity via Ashworth Scale and Pendulum Test, and

    Baseline, 4 months, 6 months and 12 months

  • Factor analysis of electromyography and kinematics of gait.

    Baseline, 4months and 6 months

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Incidence of urinary tract infections,

    Over 12 months

  • Spinal cord independence measure,

    Baseline and 12 months

  • Urinary N-telopeptide and serum osteocalcin,

    Baseline, 4 month, 6 month and 12 months

  • Timed up and go and two-minute walk test (functional mobility),

    Baseline, 4 months, 6 months and 12 months

  • Incidence of pressure sores,

    Over 12 months

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

FES training

OTHER

Arm 1 receives functional electrical stimulation while walking on body weight suspension training.

Device: Compex Motion Stimulator

Control Group training

OTHER

Aerobic and resistance training program

Other: Conventional Exercise

Interventions

Functional Electrical Stimulation applied to the lower limbs of SCI individuals in order to stimulate walking while on Body Weight Support Treadmill

Also known as: Brand Name: Loko 70, Code Names: BWST, FES
FES training

An aerobic and resistance training program.

Also known as: Conventional Physiotherapy
Control Group training

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • incomplete spinal cord lesion of sudden onset between C6 and T12 that is motor incomplete (grade C or D on the ASIA neurological impairment scale). The injury must have occurred at least two years prior to recruitment

You may not qualify if:

  • contraindications for FES, such as cardiac pacemakers, skin lesions or rush at potential electrode sites, or denervation of targeted muscles.
  • pressure ulcers anywhere on the lower extremities
  • hypertension that is uncontrolled
  • symptoms of orthostatic hypotension when standing for 15 minutes
  • susceptibility to autonomic dysreflexia, requiring medication.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Lyndhurst Centre, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute

Toronto, Ontario, M4G 3V9, Canada

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Kapadia N, Masani K, Catharine Craven B, Giangregorio LM, Hitzig SL, Richards K, Popovic MR. A randomized trial of functional electrical stimulation for walking in incomplete spinal cord injury: Effects on walking competency. J Spinal Cord Med. 2014 Sep;37(5):511-24. doi: 10.1179/2045772314Y.0000000263.

  • Giangregorio L, Craven C, Richards K, Kapadia N, Hitzig SL, Masani K, Popovic MR. A randomized trial of functional electrical stimulation for walking in incomplete spinal cord injury: effects on body composition. J Spinal Cord Med. 2012 Sep;35(5):351-60. doi: 10.1179/2045772312Y.0000000041.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Spinal Cord Injuries

Interventions

Electric Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal Cord DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds and Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Physical StimulationInvestigative Techniques

Study Officials

  • Milos Popovic, PhD

    University of Toronto

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Senior Scientist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2005

First Posted

September 20, 2005

Study Start

April 1, 2005

Primary Completion

April 1, 2013

Study Completion

April 1, 2013

Last Updated

February 27, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-02

Locations