NCT00195650

Brief Summary

The purpose of the study was to assess the long-term safety and clinical efficacy following repeated administration of adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
846

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3 rheumatoid-arthritis

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2000

Longer than P75 for phase_3 rheumatoid-arthritis

Geographic Reach
2 countries

92 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2000

Completed
5.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 13, 2005

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 20, 2005

Completed
5.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2011

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 31, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

August 31, 2012

Status Verified

August 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

10.8 years

First QC Date

September 13, 2005

Results QC Date

May 4, 2012

Last Update Submit

August 24, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (10)

  • Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria at Week 520

    ACR20 response criteria were: \>=20% improvement in tender joint count; \>=20% improvement in swollen joint count; and \>=20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core measures: patient assessment of pain; patient global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ\]); and C-reactive protein (a laboratory marker of inflammation that is sensitive to acute changes in inflammatory response). All improvements were assessed relative to the baseline of the prior study.

    Week 520

  • Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria at Week 260

    ACR20 response criteria were: \>=20% improvement in tender joint count; \>=20% improvement in swollen joint count; and \>=20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core measures: patient assessment of pain; patient global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ\]); and C-reactive protein (a laboratory marker of inflammation that is sensitive to acute changes in inflammatory response). All improvements were assessed relative to the baseline of the prior study.

    Week 260

  • Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 520

    ACR50 response criteria were: \>=50% improvement in tender joint count; \>=50% improvement in swollen joint count; and \>=50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core measures: patient assessment of pain; patient global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ\]); and C-reactive protein (a laboratory marker of inflammation that is sensitive to acute changes in inflammatory response). All improvements were assessed relative to the baseline of the prior study.

    Week 520

  • Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 260

    ACR50 response criteria were: \>=50% improvement in tender joint count; \>=50% improvement in swollen joint count; and \>=50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core measures: patient assessment of pain; patient global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ\]); and C-reactive protein (a laboratory marker of inflammation that is sensitive to acute changes in inflammatory response). All improvements were assessed relative to the baseline of the prior study.

    Week 260

  • Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria at Week 520

    ACR70 response criteria were: \>=70% improvement in tender joint count; \>=70% improvement in swollen joint count; and \>=70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core measures: patient assessment of pain; patient global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ\]); and C-reactive protein (a laboratory marker of inflammation that is sensitive to acute changes in inflammatory response). All improvements were assessed relative to the baseline of the prior study.

    Week 520

  • Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria at Week 260

    ACR70 response criteria were: \>=70% improvement in tender joint count; \>=70% improvement in swollen joint count; and \>=70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core measures: patient assessment of pain; patient global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ\]); and C-reactive protein (a laboratory marker of inflammation that is sensitive to acute changes in inflammatory response). All improvements were assessed relative to the baseline of the prior study.

    Week 260

  • Number of Participants in Clinical Remission (Based on Modified Disease Activity Score) at Week 520

    Clinical remission on modified Disease Activity Score (DAS28) was a value \<2.6; \>=2.6 to \<=3.2 indicated low disease activity; \>3.2 to \<=5.1 indicated moderate disease activity; and \>5.1 indicated high disease activity. DAS28 score is calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (out of 28 each), patient global assessment of disease activity, and C-reactive protein (a laboratory marker of inflammation that is sensitive to acute changes in inflammatory response).

    Week 520

  • Number of Participants in Clinical Remission (Based on Modified Disease Activity Score) at Week 260

    Clinical remission on modified Disease Activity Score (DAS28) was a value \<2.6; \>=2.6 to \<=3.2 indicated low disease activity; \>3.2 to \<=5.1 indicated moderate disease activity; and \>5.1 indicated high disease activity. DAS28 score is calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (out of 28 each), patient global assessment of disease activity, and C-reactive protein (a laboratory marker of inflammation that is sensitive to acute changes in inflammatory response).

    Week 260

  • Change From Baseline in the Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) at Week 520

    The HAQ-DI is a measure of disability that ranges from 0 to 3. Decrease in score indicates improvement in physical function; a decrease of 0.22 or greater from Baseline score is clinically significant. Participants assessed their ability to perform at least 6 of the following 8 specific tasks (1. dress/groom; 2. arise; 3. eat; 4. walk; 5. reach; 6. grip; 7. maintain hygiene; 8. maintain daily activity) over the past week by marking their response on a questionnaire. Possible responses/scores included the following: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). The 8 task scores are added and the sum is divided by the number of tasks assessed (range = 6 to 8). This yields a HAQ-DI score of 0 to 3.

    Baseline of prior Phase 1, 2, or 3 adalimumab study and Week 520

  • Change From Baseline in the Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) at Week 260

    The HAQ-DI is a measure of disability that ranges from 0 to 3. Decrease in score indicates improvement in physical function; a decrease of 0.22 or greater from Baseline score is clinically significant. Participants assessed their ability to perform at least 6 of the following 8 specific tasks (1. dress/groom; 2. arise; 3. eat; 4. walk; 5. reach; 6. grip; 7. maintain hygiene; 8. maintain daily activity) over the past week by marking their response on a questionnaire. Possible responses/scores included the following: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). The 8 task scores are added and the sum is divided by the number of tasks assessed (range = 6 to 8). This yields a HAQ-DI score of 0 to 3.

    Baseline of prior Phase 1, 2, or 3 adalimumab study and Week 260

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Reported Adverse Events

    Duration of study (up to 520 weeks [10 years])

Study Arms (1)

Adalimumab

EXPERIMENTAL

Open-label adalimumab 40 mg

Biological: Adalimumab

Interventions

AdalimumabBIOLOGICAL

Subcutaneous injection of 40 mg adalimumab every other week (eow) or monthly for up to 520 weeks (10 years)

Also known as: Humira, ABT-D2E7
Adalimumab

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participant was in a prior D2E7 (adalimumab) study
  • Participant was age 18 or older and in good health (Investigator discretion) with a recent stable medical history.

You may not qualify if:

  • Participant was considered by the investigator, for any reason, to be an unsuitable candidate for the study
  • Participant was a female subject who is pregnant or breast-feeding or considering becoming pregnant
  • Participant had any ongoing chronic or active infection

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (92)

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 538

Birmingham, Alabama, 35205, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4111

Birmingham, Alabama, 35294-7201, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4113

Mobile, Alabama, 36608, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 408

Anchorage, Alaska, 99508, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 537

Tucson, Arizona, 85710, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 66822

Anaheim, California, 92801, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 557

La Jolla, California, 92037-0943, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 387

Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 555

Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 552

Santa Barbara, California, 93105, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 66864

Santa Monica, California, 90404, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 535

Stanford, California, 94305, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3412

Upland, California, 91786, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 451

Westlake Village, California, 91361, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 572

Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80910, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4109

Denver, Colorado, 80230, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 541

Danbury, Connecticut, 06810, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 654

Milford, Connecticut, 06460, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 655

Wilmington, Delaware, 19808, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 455

Daytona Beach, Florida, 32114, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 431

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33334, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 574

Fort Myers, Florida, 33901, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 66843

Gainesville, Florida, 32605, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 579

Orlando, Florida, 32804, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 571

Palm Harbor, Florida, 34684, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 651

Sarasota, Florida, 34239, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 66863

St. Petersburg, Florida, 33710, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 542

Tampa, Florida, 33609, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 415

Vero Beach, Florida, 32962, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 652

Zephyrhills, Florida, 33542, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 449

Boise, Idaho, 83702, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4110

Boise, Idaho, 83706, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 650

Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, 83814, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 578

Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4112

Indianapolis, Indiana, 46260, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 547

Louisville, Kentucky, 40291, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 534

Metairie, Louisiana, 70006, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 544

Chevy Chase, Maryland, 20815, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 653

Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4114

Worcester, Massachusetts, 01610, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 546

Petoskey, Michigan, 49770, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 577

St Louis, Missouri, 63128, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 549

Billings, Montana, 59101, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 561

Reno, Nevada, 89502, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 573

Dover, New Jersey, 07801, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 66842

Toms River, New Jersey, 08755, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 559

Voorhees Township, New Jersey, 08043, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 562

Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 66823

Brooklyn, New York, 11203, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 432

Lake Success, New York, 11042, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 657

New York, New York, 10003, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 647

New York, New York, 10021, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 545

Port Jefferson Station, New York, 11776, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 540

Syracuse, New York, 13210, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 646

Statesville, North Carolina, 28625, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 438

Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 436

Dayton, Ohio, 45408, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 548

Bend, Oregon, 97701, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 553

Eugene, Oregon, 97401, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 532

Portland, Oregon, 97205, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 570

Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18015, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 575

Ridley Park, Pennsylvania, 19078-2210, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 585

Willow Grove, Pennsylvania, 19090, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 2435

Dallas, Texas, 75231, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 536

Richmond, Virginia, 23219, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 649

Everett, Washington, 98201, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 66862

Everett, Washington, 98201, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 531

Kirkland, Washington, 98034, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 412

Olympia, Washington, 98502, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 658

Spokane, Washington, 99204, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 576

Vancouver, Washington, 98664, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 551

Yakima, Washington, 98902, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 656

Glendale, Wisconsin, 53217, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 539

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53215, United States

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 513

Calgary, T2V 1P9, Canada

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 568

Charlottetown, C1A 5Y8, Canada

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 565

Hamilton, L8N 1Y2, Canada

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 564

Hamilton, L8N 2B6, Canada

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 569

Kitchener, N2M 5N6, Canada

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3440

Montreal, H2L 1S6, Canada

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 413

Montreal, H3Z 2Z3, Canada

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 66805

North York, M3H 5Y8, Canada

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 66807

North York, M3H 5Y8, Canada

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 414

Ottawa, K1H 7W9, Canada

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 566

Pointe-Claire, H9J 3W3, Canada

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 2467

Sainte-Foy, Quebec, G1W 4R4, Canada

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 66804

Scarborough, M1B 4Y9, Canada

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 563

St. John's, A1B 3E1, Canada

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 2466

Toronto, M4N 3M5, Canada

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 567

Toronto, M5L 3L9, Canada

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3442

Vancouver, V5Z 1L7, Canada

Location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 514

Winnipeg, R3A 1M4, Canada

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Furst DE, Kavanaugh A, Florentinus S, Kupper H, Karunaratne M, Birbara CA. Final 10-year effectiveness and safety results from study DE020: adalimumab treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to standard therapy. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015 Dec;54(12):2188-97. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev249. Epub 2015 Jul 21.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Arthritis, Rheumatoid

Interventions

Adalimumab

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic DiseasesConnective Tissue DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodiesImmunoglobulinsImmunoproteinsBlood ProteinsProteinsAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsSerum GlobulinsGlobulins

Results Point of Contact

Title
Global Medical Services
Organization
Abbott

Study Officials

  • Hartmut Kupper, MD

    Abbott

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2005

First Posted

September 20, 2005

Study Start

July 1, 2000

Primary Completion

May 1, 2011

Study Completion

May 1, 2011

Last Updated

August 31, 2012

Results First Posted

July 31, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-08

Locations