Long Term Open Label Continuation Study
A Multi-Center Continuation Study of the Human Anti-TNF Antibody D2E7 Administered as a Subcutaneous Injection in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
1 other identifier
interventional
846
2 countries
92
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study was to assess the long-term safety and clinical efficacy following repeated administration of adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3 rheumatoid-arthritis
Started Jul 2000
Longer than P75 for phase_3 rheumatoid-arthritis
92 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2000
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 13, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 20, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 31, 2012
CompletedAugust 31, 2012
August 1, 2012
10.8 years
September 13, 2005
May 4, 2012
August 24, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria at Week 520
ACR20 response criteria were: \>=20% improvement in tender joint count; \>=20% improvement in swollen joint count; and \>=20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core measures: patient assessment of pain; patient global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ\]); and C-reactive protein (a laboratory marker of inflammation that is sensitive to acute changes in inflammatory response). All improvements were assessed relative to the baseline of the prior study.
Week 520
Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Criteria at Week 260
ACR20 response criteria were: \>=20% improvement in tender joint count; \>=20% improvement in swollen joint count; and \>=20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core measures: patient assessment of pain; patient global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ\]); and C-reactive protein (a laboratory marker of inflammation that is sensitive to acute changes in inflammatory response). All improvements were assessed relative to the baseline of the prior study.
Week 260
Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 520
ACR50 response criteria were: \>=50% improvement in tender joint count; \>=50% improvement in swollen joint count; and \>=50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core measures: patient assessment of pain; patient global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ\]); and C-reactive protein (a laboratory marker of inflammation that is sensitive to acute changes in inflammatory response). All improvements were assessed relative to the baseline of the prior study.
Week 520
Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Criteria at Week 260
ACR50 response criteria were: \>=50% improvement in tender joint count; \>=50% improvement in swollen joint count; and \>=50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core measures: patient assessment of pain; patient global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ\]); and C-reactive protein (a laboratory marker of inflammation that is sensitive to acute changes in inflammatory response). All improvements were assessed relative to the baseline of the prior study.
Week 260
Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria at Week 520
ACR70 response criteria were: \>=70% improvement in tender joint count; \>=70% improvement in swollen joint count; and \>=70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core measures: patient assessment of pain; patient global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ\]); and C-reactive protein (a laboratory marker of inflammation that is sensitive to acute changes in inflammatory response). All improvements were assessed relative to the baseline of the prior study.
Week 520
Number of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Criteria at Week 260
ACR70 response criteria were: \>=70% improvement in tender joint count; \>=70% improvement in swollen joint count; and \>=70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core measures: patient assessment of pain; patient global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ\]); and C-reactive protein (a laboratory marker of inflammation that is sensitive to acute changes in inflammatory response). All improvements were assessed relative to the baseline of the prior study.
Week 260
Number of Participants in Clinical Remission (Based on Modified Disease Activity Score) at Week 520
Clinical remission on modified Disease Activity Score (DAS28) was a value \<2.6; \>=2.6 to \<=3.2 indicated low disease activity; \>3.2 to \<=5.1 indicated moderate disease activity; and \>5.1 indicated high disease activity. DAS28 score is calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (out of 28 each), patient global assessment of disease activity, and C-reactive protein (a laboratory marker of inflammation that is sensitive to acute changes in inflammatory response).
Week 520
Number of Participants in Clinical Remission (Based on Modified Disease Activity Score) at Week 260
Clinical remission on modified Disease Activity Score (DAS28) was a value \<2.6; \>=2.6 to \<=3.2 indicated low disease activity; \>3.2 to \<=5.1 indicated moderate disease activity; and \>5.1 indicated high disease activity. DAS28 score is calculated using the number of tender joints and swollen joints (out of 28 each), patient global assessment of disease activity, and C-reactive protein (a laboratory marker of inflammation that is sensitive to acute changes in inflammatory response).
Week 260
Change From Baseline in the Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) at Week 520
The HAQ-DI is a measure of disability that ranges from 0 to 3. Decrease in score indicates improvement in physical function; a decrease of 0.22 or greater from Baseline score is clinically significant. Participants assessed their ability to perform at least 6 of the following 8 specific tasks (1. dress/groom; 2. arise; 3. eat; 4. walk; 5. reach; 6. grip; 7. maintain hygiene; 8. maintain daily activity) over the past week by marking their response on a questionnaire. Possible responses/scores included the following: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). The 8 task scores are added and the sum is divided by the number of tasks assessed (range = 6 to 8). This yields a HAQ-DI score of 0 to 3.
Baseline of prior Phase 1, 2, or 3 adalimumab study and Week 520
Change From Baseline in the Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) at Week 260
The HAQ-DI is a measure of disability that ranges from 0 to 3. Decrease in score indicates improvement in physical function; a decrease of 0.22 or greater from Baseline score is clinically significant. Participants assessed their ability to perform at least 6 of the following 8 specific tasks (1. dress/groom; 2. arise; 3. eat; 4. walk; 5. reach; 6. grip; 7. maintain hygiene; 8. maintain daily activity) over the past week by marking their response on a questionnaire. Possible responses/scores included the following: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). The 8 task scores are added and the sum is divided by the number of tasks assessed (range = 6 to 8). This yields a HAQ-DI score of 0 to 3.
Baseline of prior Phase 1, 2, or 3 adalimumab study and Week 260
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Reported Adverse Events
Duration of study (up to 520 weeks [10 years])
Study Arms (1)
Adalimumab
EXPERIMENTALOpen-label adalimumab 40 mg
Interventions
Subcutaneous injection of 40 mg adalimumab every other week (eow) or monthly for up to 520 weeks (10 years)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participant was in a prior D2E7 (adalimumab) study
- Participant was age 18 or older and in good health (Investigator discretion) with a recent stable medical history.
You may not qualify if:
- Participant was considered by the investigator, for any reason, to be an unsuitable candidate for the study
- Participant was a female subject who is pregnant or breast-feeding or considering becoming pregnant
- Participant had any ongoing chronic or active infection
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Abbottlead
Study Sites (92)
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 538
Birmingham, Alabama, 35205, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4111
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294-7201, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4113
Mobile, Alabama, 36608, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 408
Anchorage, Alaska, 99508, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 537
Tucson, Arizona, 85710, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 66822
Anaheim, California, 92801, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 557
La Jolla, California, 92037-0943, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 387
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 555
Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 552
Santa Barbara, California, 93105, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 66864
Santa Monica, California, 90404, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 535
Stanford, California, 94305, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3412
Upland, California, 91786, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 451
Westlake Village, California, 91361, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 572
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80910, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4109
Denver, Colorado, 80230, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 541
Danbury, Connecticut, 06810, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 654
Milford, Connecticut, 06460, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 655
Wilmington, Delaware, 19808, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 455
Daytona Beach, Florida, 32114, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 431
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33334, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 574
Fort Myers, Florida, 33901, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 66843
Gainesville, Florida, 32605, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 579
Orlando, Florida, 32804, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 571
Palm Harbor, Florida, 34684, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 651
Sarasota, Florida, 34239, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 66863
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33710, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 542
Tampa, Florida, 33609, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 415
Vero Beach, Florida, 32962, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 652
Zephyrhills, Florida, 33542, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 449
Boise, Idaho, 83702, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4110
Boise, Idaho, 83706, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 650
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, 83814, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 578
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4112
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46260, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 547
Louisville, Kentucky, 40291, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 534
Metairie, Louisiana, 70006, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 544
Chevy Chase, Maryland, 20815, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 653
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 4114
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01610, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 546
Petoskey, Michigan, 49770, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 577
St Louis, Missouri, 63128, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 549
Billings, Montana, 59101, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 561
Reno, Nevada, 89502, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 573
Dover, New Jersey, 07801, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 66842
Toms River, New Jersey, 08755, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 559
Voorhees Township, New Jersey, 08043, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 562
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 66823
Brooklyn, New York, 11203, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 432
Lake Success, New York, 11042, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 657
New York, New York, 10003, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 647
New York, New York, 10021, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 545
Port Jefferson Station, New York, 11776, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 540
Syracuse, New York, 13210, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 646
Statesville, North Carolina, 28625, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 438
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 436
Dayton, Ohio, 45408, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 548
Bend, Oregon, 97701, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 553
Eugene, Oregon, 97401, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 532
Portland, Oregon, 97205, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 570
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18015, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 575
Ridley Park, Pennsylvania, 19078-2210, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 585
Willow Grove, Pennsylvania, 19090, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 2435
Dallas, Texas, 75231, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 536
Richmond, Virginia, 23219, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 649
Everett, Washington, 98201, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 66862
Everett, Washington, 98201, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 531
Kirkland, Washington, 98034, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 412
Olympia, Washington, 98502, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 658
Spokane, Washington, 99204, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 576
Vancouver, Washington, 98664, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 551
Yakima, Washington, 98902, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 656
Glendale, Wisconsin, 53217, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 539
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53215, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 513
Calgary, T2V 1P9, Canada
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 568
Charlottetown, C1A 5Y8, Canada
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 565
Hamilton, L8N 1Y2, Canada
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 564
Hamilton, L8N 2B6, Canada
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 569
Kitchener, N2M 5N6, Canada
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3440
Montreal, H2L 1S6, Canada
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 413
Montreal, H3Z 2Z3, Canada
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 66805
North York, M3H 5Y8, Canada
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 66807
North York, M3H 5Y8, Canada
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 414
Ottawa, K1H 7W9, Canada
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 566
Pointe-Claire, H9J 3W3, Canada
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 2467
Sainte-Foy, Quebec, G1W 4R4, Canada
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 66804
Scarborough, M1B 4Y9, Canada
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 563
St. John's, A1B 3E1, Canada
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 2466
Toronto, M4N 3M5, Canada
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 567
Toronto, M5L 3L9, Canada
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 3442
Vancouver, V5Z 1L7, Canada
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 514
Winnipeg, R3A 1M4, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Furst DE, Kavanaugh A, Florentinus S, Kupper H, Karunaratne M, Birbara CA. Final 10-year effectiveness and safety results from study DE020: adalimumab treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to standard therapy. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015 Dec;54(12):2188-97. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev249. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
PMID: 26199453DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Global Medical Services
- Organization
- Abbott
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Hartmut Kupper, MD
Abbott
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 13, 2005
First Posted
September 20, 2005
Study Start
July 1, 2000
Primary Completion
May 1, 2011
Study Completion
May 1, 2011
Last Updated
August 31, 2012
Results First Posted
July 31, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-08