Study Comparing Tigecycline Versus Ceftriaxone Sodium Plus Metronidazole in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection
A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Comparative Study of Tigecycline vs Ceftriaxone Sodium Plus Metronidazole for the Treatment of Hospitalized Subjects With Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection
1 other identifier
interventional
467
6 countries
66
Brief Summary
This is a phase 3b/4 randomized, open-label, comparative, multicenter study of the safety and efficacy of tigecycline to ceftriaxone sodium plus metronidazole in hospitalized subjects with cIAI (Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection). Subjects with clinical signs and symptoms of cIAI will be included for enrollment. Subjects will be stratified at randomization for Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation scale (APACHE II) score \< 10 and \> 10. Subjects will be followed for efficacy through the test-of-cure assessment. Safety evaluations will occur through the treatment and post-treatment periods and continue through resolution or stability of the adverse event(s).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Sep 2005
Typical duration for phase_4
66 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 12, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 19, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 10, 2009
CompletedFebruary 25, 2013
February 1, 2013
2.4 years
September 12, 2005
February 27, 2009
February 20, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Clinically Evaluable Patients With Clinical Response of Cure at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit.
The clinical response was assigned by the investigator according to the protocol-specified guidelines. A clinical response of cure was defined as: the test article and the initial intervention (operative and/or radiologically controlled drainage procedure) resolved the intra-abdominal infection.
10-21 days after the last dose of test article
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Number of Microbiologically Evaluable Patients With a Clinical Response of Cure at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit.
10-21 days after the last dose of test article
Number of Patients by Microbiologic Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit.
10-21 days after the last dose of test article
Study Arms (2)
A
ACTIVE COMPARATORB
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Ceftriaxone sodium 2 g once daily intravenously plus metronidazole 1 g to 2 g daily given in divided doses intravenously. Test article should be administered for a minimum of 4 days and up to 14 days at the discretion of the investigator.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of complicated intra-abdominal infection that requires surgery within 24 hours.
- Fever over 100.4°F (38.0°C) or high white blood cell count plus other symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain.
You may not qualify if:
- Cancer
- Medicines that suppress the immune system
- Dialysis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (66)
Unknown Facility
Mobile, Alabama, 36617, United States
Unknown Facility
Laguna Hills, California, 92653, United States
Unknown Facility
Los Angeles, California, 90033, United States
Unknown Facility
Orange, California, 92868, United States
Unknown Facility
Palm Springs, California, 92262, United States
Unknown Facility
San Diego, California, 92134, United States
Unknown Facility
Torrance, California, 90509, United States
Unknown Facility
Denver, Colorado, 80204, United States
Unknown Facility
Denver, Colorado, 80262, United States
Unknown Facility
Hartford, Connecticut, 06102, United States
Unknown Facility
Newark, Delaware, 19718, United States
Unknown Facility
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20037, United States
Unknown Facility
Miami, Florida, 33136, United States
Unknown Facility
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342, United States
Unknown Facility
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813, United States
Unknown Facility
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Unknown Facility
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
Unknown Facility
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46280, United States
Unknown Facility
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118, United States
Unknown Facility
Springfield, Massachusetts, 01199, United States
Unknown Facility
West Roxbury, Massachusetts, 02132, United States
Unknown Facility
Detroit, Michigan, 48201, United States
Unknown Facility
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49506, United States
Unknown Facility
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55422, United States
Unknown Facility
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Unknown Facility
St Louis, Missouri, 63131, United States
Unknown Facility
Butte, Montana, 59701, United States
Unknown Facility
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68510, United States
Unknown Facility
Laconia, New Hampshire, 03246, United States
Unknown Facility
Buffalo, New York, 14215, United States
Unknown Facility
Bismarck, North Dakota, 58501, United States
Unknown Facility
Fargo, North Dakota, 58122, United States
Unknown Facility
Cleveland, Ohio, 44109, United States
Unknown Facility
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
Unknown Facility
Columbus, Ohio, 43215, United States
Unknown Facility
Toledo, Ohio, 43608, United States
Unknown Facility
Zanesville, Ohio, 43701, United States
Unknown Facility
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15261, United States
Unknown Facility
Corsiana, Texas, 75151, United States
Unknown Facility
Fort Worth, Texas, 76135, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, 77026, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Unknown Facility
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84102, United States
Unknown Facility
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22906, United States
Unknown Facility
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792, United States
Unknown Facility
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226, United States
Unknown Facility
Buenos Aires, C1118AAT, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Buenos Aires, C1425DUH, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Buenos Aires, C1431FWO, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Curitiba, Paraná, 80810-050, Brazil
Unknown Facility
São Paulo, São Paulo, 01323-010, Brazil
Unknown Facility
São Paulo, São Paulo, 04330-020, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9, Canada
Unknown Facility
Victoria, British Columbia, V8T 5G4, Canada
Unknown Facility
Ajax, Ontario, L1S 2J5, Canada
Unknown Facility
Oshawa, Ontario, L1H 1B9, Canada
Unknown Facility
Toronto, Ontario, M1E 5E9, Canada
Unknown Facility
Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8, Canada
Unknown Facility
Chicoutimi, Quebec, G7H 5H6, Canada
Unknown Facility
Greenfield Park, Quebec, J4V 2H1, Canada
Unknown Facility
Montreal, Quebec, H2X 3J4, Canada
Unknown Facility
Rimouski, Quebec, G5L 5T1, Canada
Unknown Facility
Trois-Rivières, Quebec, G8Z 3R9, Canada
Unknown Facility
Santiago, Chile
Unknown Facility
Viña del Mar, Chile
Unknown Facility
Mexico D.F. CP, 03100, Mexico
Related Publications (1)
Towfigh S, Pasternak J, Poirier A, Leister H, Babinchak T. A multicentre, open-label, randomized comparative study of tigecycline versus ceftriaxone sodium plus metronidazole for the treatment of hospitalized subjects with complicated intra-abdominal infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010 Aug;16(8):1274-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03122.x.
PMID: 20670293DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- U. S. Contact Center
- Organization
- Wyeth
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Medical Monitor
Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 12, 2005
First Posted
September 19, 2005
Study Start
September 1, 2005
Primary Completion
February 1, 2008
Study Completion
February 1, 2008
Last Updated
February 25, 2013
Results First Posted
June 10, 2009
Record last verified: 2013-02