Venlafaxine Versus Lamotrigine in the Treatment of Bipolar I/II Depression
Double-Blind, Acute Depression Study Comparing Venlafaxine XR and Lamotrigine When Added to Mood Stabilizer in the Treatment of Bipolar Depression
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of venlafaxine XR and lamotrigine when each is added to mood stabilizer therapy in patients with acute depressive episodes of bipolar I or Bipolar II disorder. Efficacy of therapy will be evaluated using improvements in clinical symptomatology after 8 weeks of treatment as measured by reductions on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-29) total score \>50% from baseline. We also would like to assess the efficacy of venlafaxine XR and lamotrigine when each is added to mood stabilizer therapy in improving clinical symptomatology after 8 weeks of therapy as well as to evaluate the side effect profile, safety and tolerability of venlafaxine XR and lamotrigine.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jan 2002
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2002
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 12, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 16, 2005
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2007
CompletedFebruary 9, 2011
February 1, 2005
September 12, 2005
February 8, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, 21 item
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Clinical Global Impression (CGI-I, CGI-S)
Quality of Life Enjoyment
Global Assessment of Functioning
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \. Meets DSM-IV criteria for a diagnosis of Bipolar I disorder, most recent episode depression, or bipolar II disorder, most recent episode depression using the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis 1 disorders 2. Subjects must have a Hamilton depression rating scale score of \>16. 3. Patients at visit 1 must have documented trials (levels must be obtained) of their mood stabilizer for at least 2 weeks 4. Subjects must be between the ages of 18-70, male or female 5. Treatment with oral antipsychotics, anticonvulsants or benzodiazepines prior to enrolment or during the study will be permitted, but not other antidepressants.
- \. Female patients of childbearing potential must be using a medically accepted means of contraception.
- \. Patient is judged by the investigator to be in generally good health 8. Education level and a degree of understanding is such that the patient can communicate effectively with the investigator.
- \. Patient must be capable of providing informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- \. Treatment with antidepressant medication within one day prior to visit 1 or during the protocol.
- \. Patients previously showing poor therapeutic response to venlafaxine XR or lamotrigine 3. Judged clinically to be at serious suicidal risk. 4. DSM-IV criteria for substance dependence (except nicotine or caffeine) within the past 30 days 5. Course of ECT (electroconvulsive therapy) in the preceding 4 weeks prior to visit 1 or during the protocol.
- \. Patients who suffer from a major neurological or medical illness. 7. Current diagnosis of schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders as defined in the DSM-IV 8. Uncorrected hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism 9. Female patients who are either pregnant or nursing 10. Elevated thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Toronto Western Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5T2S8, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Roger McIntyre, MD,FRCPC
University Health Network, Toronto
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 12, 2005
First Posted
September 16, 2005
Study Start
January 1, 2002
Study Completion
January 1, 2007
Last Updated
February 9, 2011
Record last verified: 2005-02