Comparison of CXR and MnDCT
A Comparison of Chest Radiography and Minimum Dose Chest CT
1 other identifier
interventional
100
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
A comparison of chest x-ray (CXR) and Minimum dose CT (MnDCT) in the acutely ill patient. The hypothesis is that MnDCT is more sensitive than CXR in the detection of acute findings in the acutely ill patient.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Nov 2003
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2003
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 12, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 16, 2005
CompletedApril 24, 2007
September 1, 2005
September 12, 2005
April 23, 2007
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
A comparison of CXr and MnDCT in the detection of acute findings within the thorax
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients admitted for investigation of acute pulmonary embolus
You may not qualify if:
- none
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Narinder Paul, FRCP C
University Health Network, Toronto
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 12, 2005
First Posted
September 16, 2005
Study Start
November 1, 2003
Study Completion
December 1, 2004
Last Updated
April 24, 2007
Record last verified: 2005-09