Second Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing (CTOPP II): Pilot Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
300
1 country
5
Brief Summary
Pacemaker therapy has been recognized as effective for the control of sinus and atrio-ventricular (AV) node dysfunction. Single chamber pacing when compared with dual chamber pacing, has numerous advantages of low complication rates, lower cost, better longevity, with non-inferiority in the quality of life and hard outcomes proven in direct randomized comparisons. However, comparison between single and dual chamber pacers was never adequate, since not more then half of the patients in the trials were actually using pacemakers for the majority of the time. Routine dual chamber pacing using a right ventricle apical lead is also associated with significant increase in peri-operative and remote complications. Some of these complications may be related to ventricular desynchronization secondary to the pacing location, which is potentially avoidable by using biventricular pacing. A randomized trial which will compare single chamber rate responsive pacing to the best available modification of dual chamber pacing (biventricular pacing) in suitable patients is therefore warranted.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started May 2004
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 13, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 16, 2005
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2006
CompletedOctober 19, 2007
October 1, 2007
September 13, 2005
October 18, 2007
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Predictors of future pacemaker dependence
Feasibility of the trial
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient has symptomatic bradycardia and is a candidate for first pacemaker implantation
- Patient has high risk of being pacemaker dependent by (at least one of the following):
- Average heart rate of 60 or less on pre-implant Holter
- Maximal heart rate of 60 in patient on telemetry monitoring 12 hrs preoperatively, when not under medications decreasing heart rate, or under chronic medical treatment inducing bradycardia, which is unlikely to be changed
- First degree AV block with PR intervals \> 300 ms, or second degree AV block at heart rates \<= 80 bpm.
- Dependence for 12 hrs when on temporary pacemaker set at 50 bpm if bradycardia is not secondary to medication, or under chronic medical treatment inducing bradycardia, which is unlikely to be changed.
You may not qualify if:
- Age \<= 65 years
- Chronic Atrial Fibrillation
- Indication for ICD
- Non-cardiovascular death is likely to occur within 3 years
- Geographical, social, or psychiatric reasons making follow-up problematic
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hamilton Health Sciences Corporationlead
- Medtroniccollaborator
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centrecollaborator
Study Sites (5)
Hamilton Health Sciences - General Division
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Kingston General Hospital
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 2V7, Canada
St. Mary's General Hospital
Kitchener, Ontario, N2M 1B2, Canada
University of Ottawa Heart Institute
Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4W7, Canada
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Eugene Crystal, MD
Sunnybrook & Women's College Health Sciences Centre
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Robin S Roberts
McMaster Univeristy, Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stuart Connolly, MD
Hamilton Health Sciences - General Division
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Paul Dorian, MD
Unity Health Toronto
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 13, 2005
First Posted
September 16, 2005
Study Start
May 1, 2004
Study Completion
January 1, 2006
Last Updated
October 19, 2007
Record last verified: 2007-10