ACCULINK for Revascularization of Carotids in High Risk Patients "The ARCHeR Trial"
Prospective, Non-Randomized, Multi-Center, Single-Arm Trial to Assess Safety & Efficacy of the Acculink Carotid Stent System With the Accunet Embolic Protection System in High-Risk Patients With Carotid Artery Lesions.
1 other identifier
interventional
581
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
- 1.To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the over-the-wire (OTW) ACCULINK (tm) System in patients deemed to be either at high risk or unsuitable for carotid endarterectomy (CEA)
- 2.To evaluate the efficacy of the OTW ACCUNET System in patients deemed to be either at high risk or unsuitable for carotid endarterectomy (CEA).
- 3.To demonstrate equivalence in the safety and performance of the RX ACCULINK Carotid Stent System and RX ACCUNET Embolic Protection System and the corresponding OTW devices.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started May 2000
Typical duration for phase_2
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2000
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2003
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2003
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 13, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 16, 2005
CompletedSeptember 12, 2008
September 1, 2008
3.4 years
September 13, 2005
September 10, 2008
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
All Stroke, death and MI
within 30 days
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Ipsilateral stroke
between 31 days and 12 months
2. Target vessel revascularization
six and 12 months
3. Ultrasound evaluation
six and 12 months
4. Acute device success for the RX ACCULINK System
Acute
5. Acute device success for the RX ACCUNET Embolic Protection System
Acute
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
1
EXPERIMENTALTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of the over-the-wire (OTW) ACCULINK (tm) System in patients deemed to be either at high risk or unsuitable for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) To evaluate the efficacy of the OTW ACCUNET System in patients deemed to be either at high risk or unsuitable for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). To demonstrate equivalence in the safety and performance of the RX ACCULINK Carotid Stent System and RX ACCUNET Embolic Protection System and the corresponding OTW devices.
Interventions
Two rapid exchange devices will be evaluated: the RX ACCUNET Embolic Protection System ("RX ACCUNET") and the RX ACCULINK Carotid Stent System ("RX ACCULINK"). The RX ACCUNET Embolic Protection System is intended to facilitate the placement of diagnostic and therapeutic devices during interventional procedures and to capture embolic material that may be present during carotid artery interventional procedures. The RX ACCULINK™ Carotid Stent System is intended for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis in the internal carotid artery (ICA), with or without involvement of the contiguous common carotid artery (CCA), in asymptomatic patients and symptomatic patients.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient age \>=18.
- Patient has no childbearing potential or a negative pregnancy test within 30 days of study procedure.
- Patient or legally authorized representative, and the patient's physician, agree to have the patient return for all required clinical contacts following study enrollment.
- Patient or legally authorized representative has been informed of the nature of the study, and has provided written informed consent, approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Medical Ethics Committee (MEC) of the respective clinical site. (Sample consent - Appendix A-2).
- Patient must meet two or more of the criteria listed in a-e OR one or more of the criteria listed in f-q below:
- Knowledge of two or more proximal or major diseased coronary arteries with \>=70% stenosis that have not, or cannot be revascularized;
- Unstable angina defined as rest angina with ECG changes;
- MI within the previous 30 days and current need for carotid artery revascularization
- Concurrent requirement for aortocoronary bypass or cardiac valve surgery within 30 days;
- Contralateral occlusion of the ICA;
- Currently on a list for major organ transplantation (i.e. heart, lung, liver, kidney) or is being evaluated for such;
- Ejection fraction \<30% or New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class III or higher;
- FEV1 \<30% (Predicted);
- Dialysis-dependent renal failure;
- Uncontrolled diabetes defined as fasting glucose \>400 mg/dl and ketones \>2+;
- +12 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Candidates will be ineligible for enrollment in the study if any one of the following conditions apply:
- Patient has an evolving stroke.
- Patient has history of intolerance or allergic reaction to any of the study medications or materials, including heparin, aspirin, baby aspirin, nitinol, or x-ray contrast.
- Patient has history of intolerance or allergic reaction to both ticlopidine and clopidogrel.
- Patient has active bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or will refuse blood transfusions.
- Patient has a history of major ipsilateral stroke likely to confound study endpoints.
- Patient has severe dementia.
- Patient has a history of spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage within the past 12 months.
- Patient has had a recent (\<7 days) stroke of sufficient size (on CT or MRI) to place him or her at risk of hemorrhagic conversion during the procedure.
- Patient had hemorrhagic transformation of an ischemic stroke within the past 60 days.
- Patient has Hgb \< 8 gm/dl (unless on dialysis), platelet count \< 50,000, uncorrected INR \> 1.5, or heparin-associated thrombocytopenia.
- Patient has any condition that precludes proper angiographic assessment or makes percutaneous arterial access unsafe (e.g. morbid obesity, sustained SBP \> 180 mm Hg.).
- Patient has had neurologic illness within the past two years characterized by fleeting or fixed neurologic deficit which cannot be distinguished from TIA or stroke (e.g. partial or secondarily generalized seizures; complicated or classic migraine; tumor or other space-occupying brain lesions; subdural hematoma, cerebral contusion or other post-traumatic lesions; intracranial infection; demyelinating disease; moderate to severe dementia; or intracranial hemorrhage).
- Patient is actively participating in another drug or device trial (IND or IDE) that has not completed the required protocol follow-up period. Patients may be enrolled only once in the ARCHeR clinical trial and may not participate in any other clinical trial during the ARCHeR follow-up period.
- Patient or patient's legally authorized representative is unable to understand and cooperate with study procedures or provide informed consent.
- +10 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (7)
Naylor AR. Regarding "Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: the ARCHeR results". J Vasc Surg. 2007 Jan;45(1):222-3; author reply 223-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.08.089. No abstract available.
PMID: 17210414BACKGROUNDGray WA, Hopkins LN, Yadav S, Davis T, Wholey M, Atkinson R, Cremonesi A, Fairman R, Walker G, Verta P, Popma J, Virmani R, Cohen DJ; ARCHeR Trial Collaborators. Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: the ARCHeR results. J Vasc Surg. 2006 Aug;44(2):258-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.03.044.
PMID: 16890850BACKGROUNDSchonholz CJ, Uflacker R, Parodi JC, Hannegan C, Selby B. Is there evidence that cerebral protection is beneficial? Clinical data. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2006 Apr;47(2):137-41.
PMID: 16572087BACKGROUNDKasirajan K. What is the latest in inventory for carotid stenting and cerebral protection? Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2005 Jun;17(2):135-41. doi: 10.1177/153100350501700217.
PMID: 16110380BACKGROUNDGray WA. Endovascular treatment of extra-cranial carotid artery bifurcation disease. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2005 Feb;53(1):69-77.
PMID: 15788981BACKGROUNDGray WA. A cardiologist in the carotids. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 May 5;43(9):1602-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.11.051.
PMID: 15120818BACKGROUNDIllig KA, Zhang R, Tanski W, Benesch C, Sternbach Y, Green RM. Is the rationale for carotid angioplasty and stenting in patients excluded from NASCET/ACAS or eligible for ARCHeR justified? J Vasc Surg. 2003 Mar;37(3):575-81. doi: 10.1067/mva.2003.79.
PMID: 12618695BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
L. Nelson Hopkins, M.D.
Millard Fillmore Hospital, Buffalo, NY
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mark H. Wholey, MD
Shadyside Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 13, 2005
First Posted
September 16, 2005
Study Start
May 1, 2000
Primary Completion
October 1, 2003
Study Completion
November 1, 2003
Last Updated
September 12, 2008
Record last verified: 2008-09