NCT00180518

Brief Summary

  1. 1.To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the over-the-wire (OTW) ACCULINK (tm) System in patients deemed to be either at high risk or unsuitable for carotid endarterectomy (CEA)
  2. 2.To evaluate the efficacy of the OTW ACCUNET System in patients deemed to be either at high risk or unsuitable for carotid endarterectomy (CEA).
  3. 3.To demonstrate equivalence in the safety and performance of the RX ACCULINK Carotid Stent System and RX ACCUNET Embolic Protection System and the corresponding OTW devices.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
581

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2000

Typical duration for phase_2

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2000

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2003

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2003

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 13, 2005

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 16, 2005

Completed
Last Updated

September 12, 2008

Status Verified

September 1, 2008

Enrollment Period

3.4 years

First QC Date

September 13, 2005

Last Update Submit

September 10, 2008

Conditions

Keywords

Carotid artery diseaseHigh riskHigh surgical risk

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • All Stroke, death and MI

    within 30 days

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Ipsilateral stroke

    between 31 days and 12 months

  • 2. Target vessel revascularization

    six and 12 months

  • 3. Ultrasound evaluation

    six and 12 months

  • 4. Acute device success for the RX ACCULINK System

    Acute

  • 5. Acute device success for the RX ACCUNET Embolic Protection System

    Acute

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

1

EXPERIMENTAL

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the over-the-wire (OTW) ACCULINK (tm) System in patients deemed to be either at high risk or unsuitable for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) To evaluate the efficacy of the OTW ACCUNET System in patients deemed to be either at high risk or unsuitable for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). To demonstrate equivalence in the safety and performance of the RX ACCULINK Carotid Stent System and RX ACCUNET Embolic Protection System and the corresponding OTW devices.

Device: Over-the-wire & Rapid Exchange ACCULINK (tm) Carotid Stent & ACCUNET (tm) embolic protection system

Interventions

Two rapid exchange devices will be evaluated: the RX ACCUNET Embolic Protection System ("RX ACCUNET") and the RX ACCULINK Carotid Stent System ("RX ACCULINK"). The RX ACCUNET Embolic Protection System is intended to facilitate the placement of diagnostic and therapeutic devices during interventional procedures and to capture embolic material that may be present during carotid artery interventional procedures. The RX ACCULINK™ Carotid Stent System is intended for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis in the internal carotid artery (ICA), with or without involvement of the contiguous common carotid artery (CCA), in asymptomatic patients and symptomatic patients.

1

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient age \>=18.
  • Patient has no childbearing potential or a negative pregnancy test within 30 days of study procedure.
  • Patient or legally authorized representative, and the patient's physician, agree to have the patient return for all required clinical contacts following study enrollment.
  • Patient or legally authorized representative has been informed of the nature of the study, and has provided written informed consent, approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Medical Ethics Committee (MEC) of the respective clinical site. (Sample consent - Appendix A-2).
  • Patient must meet two or more of the criteria listed in a-e OR one or more of the criteria listed in f-q below:
  • Knowledge of two or more proximal or major diseased coronary arteries with \>=70% stenosis that have not, or cannot be revascularized;
  • Unstable angina defined as rest angina with ECG changes;
  • MI within the previous 30 days and current need for carotid artery revascularization
  • Concurrent requirement for aortocoronary bypass or cardiac valve surgery within 30 days;
  • Contralateral occlusion of the ICA;
  • Currently on a list for major organ transplantation (i.e. heart, lung, liver, kidney) or is being evaluated for such;
  • Ejection fraction \<30% or New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class III or higher;
  • FEV1 \<30% (Predicted);
  • Dialysis-dependent renal failure;
  • Uncontrolled diabetes defined as fasting glucose \>400 mg/dl and ketones \>2+;
  • +12 more criteria

You may not qualify if:

  • Candidates will be ineligible for enrollment in the study if any one of the following conditions apply:
  • Patient has an evolving stroke.
  • Patient has history of intolerance or allergic reaction to any of the study medications or materials, including heparin, aspirin, baby aspirin, nitinol, or x-ray contrast.
  • Patient has history of intolerance or allergic reaction to both ticlopidine and clopidogrel.
  • Patient has active bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or will refuse blood transfusions.
  • Patient has a history of major ipsilateral stroke likely to confound study endpoints.
  • Patient has severe dementia.
  • Patient has a history of spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage within the past 12 months.
  • Patient has had a recent (\<7 days) stroke of sufficient size (on CT or MRI) to place him or her at risk of hemorrhagic conversion during the procedure.
  • Patient had hemorrhagic transformation of an ischemic stroke within the past 60 days.
  • Patient has Hgb \< 8 gm/dl (unless on dialysis), platelet count \< 50,000, uncorrected INR \> 1.5, or heparin-associated thrombocytopenia.
  • Patient has any condition that precludes proper angiographic assessment or makes percutaneous arterial access unsafe (e.g. morbid obesity, sustained SBP \> 180 mm Hg.).
  • Patient has had neurologic illness within the past two years characterized by fleeting or fixed neurologic deficit which cannot be distinguished from TIA or stroke (e.g. partial or secondarily generalized seizures; complicated or classic migraine; tumor or other space-occupying brain lesions; subdural hematoma, cerebral contusion or other post-traumatic lesions; intracranial infection; demyelinating disease; moderate to severe dementia; or intracranial hemorrhage).
  • Patient is actively participating in another drug or device trial (IND or IDE) that has not completed the required protocol follow-up period. Patients may be enrolled only once in the ARCHeR clinical trial and may not participate in any other clinical trial during the ARCHeR follow-up period.
  • Patient or patient's legally authorized representative is unable to understand and cooperate with study procedures or provide informed consent.
  • +10 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (7)

  • Naylor AR. Regarding "Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: the ARCHeR results". J Vasc Surg. 2007 Jan;45(1):222-3; author reply 223-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.08.089. No abstract available.

    PMID: 17210414BACKGROUND
  • Gray WA, Hopkins LN, Yadav S, Davis T, Wholey M, Atkinson R, Cremonesi A, Fairman R, Walker G, Verta P, Popma J, Virmani R, Cohen DJ; ARCHeR Trial Collaborators. Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: the ARCHeR results. J Vasc Surg. 2006 Aug;44(2):258-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.03.044.

    PMID: 16890850BACKGROUND
  • Schonholz CJ, Uflacker R, Parodi JC, Hannegan C, Selby B. Is there evidence that cerebral protection is beneficial? Clinical data. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2006 Apr;47(2):137-41.

    PMID: 16572087BACKGROUND
  • Kasirajan K. What is the latest in inventory for carotid stenting and cerebral protection? Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2005 Jun;17(2):135-41. doi: 10.1177/153100350501700217.

    PMID: 16110380BACKGROUND
  • Gray WA. Endovascular treatment of extra-cranial carotid artery bifurcation disease. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2005 Feb;53(1):69-77.

    PMID: 15788981BACKGROUND
  • Gray WA. A cardiologist in the carotids. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 May 5;43(9):1602-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.11.051.

    PMID: 15120818BACKGROUND
  • Illig KA, Zhang R, Tanski W, Benesch C, Sternbach Y, Green RM. Is the rationale for carotid angioplasty and stenting in patients excluded from NASCET/ACAS or eligible for ARCHeR justified? J Vasc Surg. 2003 Mar;37(3):575-81. doi: 10.1067/mva.2003.79.

    PMID: 12618695BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Carotid Artery Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • L. Nelson Hopkins, M.D.

    Millard Fillmore Hospital, Buffalo, NY

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Mark H. Wholey, MD

    Shadyside Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2005

First Posted

September 16, 2005

Study Start

May 1, 2000

Primary Completion

October 1, 2003

Study Completion

November 1, 2003

Last Updated

September 12, 2008

Record last verified: 2008-09