NCT00167336

Brief Summary

This study will develop and refine an observational assessment tool called the Personal Computer Keyboard Style (PeCKS). When completed this assessment tool will provide researchers and clinicians with a valid and reliable method to describe computer keyboarding postures and kinematics. The proposed study will be divided into two phases. Phase I will be devoted to developing and refining an instrument, the Pre-PeCKS, into a valid and reliable data gathering observational tool. In Phase II the Pre-PeCKS will be used to develop a predictive model that can discriminate between those with and without MSD-UE. The model developed will be used to select the construction and weighting of the subscales of the final instrument, the PeCKS. Phase I - PeCKS psychometrics - reliability and validity Specific Aim 1: To evaluate inter- and intra-rater reliability and the concurrent criterion-related validity of the Pre-PeCKS. H.1.1 The Pre-PeCKS will demonstrate acceptable reliability for the following tests: H.1.1a. Intra-rater reliability (stability within one rater) H.1.1b. Inter-rater reliability (stability across raters) H.1.1c. Test of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) (stability across items) H.1.2 The Pre-PeCKS will demonstrate good concurrent criterion-related validity - Parameters selected by raters using the Pre-PeCKS will significantly correlate with biomechanical measures (VICON™ motion recording and analysis system and force plate): H.1.2.a. Angles and displacements identified by raters using the Pre-PeCKS will correlate with angles and displacements measured by the VICON™ motion recording and analysis system; H.1.2.b. Number of times spent performing actions as specified by raters using the Pre-PeCKS will correlate with number of times measured by a VICON™ motion recording and analysis system; H.1.2.c. Level of forceful keying as specified by raters using the Pre-PeCKS will correlate with levels of forceful keying measured with a force plate under the keyboard. Phase II - PeCKS psychometrics - diagnostic tool development Specific Aim 2: To use information gathered using the Pre-PeCKS to develop a diagnostic instrument that can identify those with and without MSD-UE. The major hypothesis related to Specific Aim 2 is: H.2.1. Using information gathered with the Pre-PeCKS and knowing the disease outcome of the subjects, predictive models can be developed that discriminate between those who do and do not have MSD-UE.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2004

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2004

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2005

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 9, 2005

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 14, 2005

Completed
Last Updated

December 16, 2015

Status Verified

June 1, 2006

First QC Date

September 9, 2005

Last Update Submit

December 15, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

ComputerKinematicsInstrument developmentReliabilityCumulative Trauma Disorder

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Computer Users who use a computer at least 20 hours per week with or without cumulative trauma disorders

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15260, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Baker NA, Redfern MS. Developing an observational instrument to evaluate personal computer keyboarding style. Appl Ergon. 2005 May;36(3):345-54. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2004.11.003.

    PMID: 15854578BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cumulative Trauma Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Sprains and StrainsWounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Nancy A Baker, ScD

    University of Pittsburgh

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 9, 2005

First Posted

September 14, 2005

Study Start

May 1, 2004

Study Completion

March 1, 2005

Last Updated

December 16, 2015

Record last verified: 2006-06

Locations