Comparison of Excision Versus Punch Incision in the Treatment of Epidermal Cysts
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this trial is to compare two standard of care treatments for removing epidermal cysts. Surgical excision removes the entire cyst but requires a larger hole in the skin. A punch incision makes a smaller hole through which the cyst can be removed. The trial's purpose is to determine if one method is better than another in terms of recurrence, infection, or other side effects.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jan 2005
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 12, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 14, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 4, 2014
CompletedAugust 4, 2014
July 1, 2014
3.5 years
September 12, 2005
July 17, 2013
July 11, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Cyst Recurrence
Recurrence of cyst after removal
16 months
Study Arms (2)
Punch excision
EXPERIMENTALTraditional excision
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Traditional extirpation of cyst en toto
removal of cyst first with incisional effort with a punch biopsy tool
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult 18 years or older
- Epidermal cyst 1-3 cm in diameter on the trunk
You may not qualify if:
- Infected cyst requiring systemic antibiotics
- Pregnant females
- Unable to return to clinic for suture removal
- Previous excision of target cyst
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Emory Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Atlanta VA Medical Center
Decatur, Georgia, 30322, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The limitations of this study include the small, predominately male patient population, lack of complete follow-up of secondary endpoint measurements at every time point.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Suephy Chen
- Organization
- Emory University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Suephy C Chen, MD
Emory University Department of Dermatology
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 12, 2005
First Posted
September 14, 2005
Study Start
January 1, 2005
Primary Completion
July 1, 2008
Study Completion
July 1, 2011
Last Updated
August 4, 2014
Results First Posted
August 4, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-07