Ultrathin Versus Conventional Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Unsedated Patient With or Without Local Pharyngeal Anaesthesia
Comparison of Ultrathin Versus Conventional Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Unsedated Patients With or Without Local Pharyngeal Anaesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
400
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate whether an ultrathin endoscope will improve a patient's tolerance during the procedure. In addition, this study will look at whether local pharyngeal anaesthesia is necessary during ultrathin endoscopy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 10, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 14, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2010
CompletedFebruary 17, 2012
September 1, 2005
6 years
September 10, 2005
February 16, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
patient's tolerance and anxiety in visual analog scale (VAS) score
Secondary Outcomes (1)
patient's satisfaction; procedure time; complications
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged between 18-70
You may not qualify if:
- Previous experience of upper endoscopy
- Allergy to local pharyngeal anaesthesia
- Patient requesting sedation during endoscopy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wilfred Lik-Man Mui, MD
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 10, 2005
First Posted
September 14, 2005
Study Start
September 1, 2004
Primary Completion
September 1, 2010
Last Updated
February 17, 2012
Record last verified: 2005-09