Compare Combined Sphincterotomy and Balloon Dilation (ESBD) Versus Standard Sphincterotomy (ES) in Removing Biliary Stones
Combined Sphincterotomy and Balloon Dilation (ESBD) Versus Standard Sphincterotomy (ES) in Removing Biliary Stones-a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
180
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To compare the technique of combined balloon sphincter dilation after an initial sphincterotomy and standard sphincterotomy in the endoscopic removal of large bile duct stones. The investigators hypothesize that combined balloon dilation and sphincterotomy allows for easier stone removal without added morbidities when compared to standard sphincterotomy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 11, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 14, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2011
CompletedFebruary 17, 2012
September 1, 2010
6 years
September 11, 2005
February 16, 2012
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
stone clearance rate at the index session
The ability to achieve complete stone clearance on the first ERCP
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Number of ERCP's required to achieve stone clearance
3 months
ERCP related complications
30 days
Study Arms (2)
Standard sphincterotomy (ES)
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter deep cannulation, a pull-type sphincterotomy will be performed with a 25mm sphincterotome (eg clever cut, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) with division of sphincter up to the duodenal wall. A complete sphincterotomy is defined by the free passage of a fully bowed sphincterotome with a 25m wire and spontaneous bile drainage.
Sphincterotomy plus balloon dilation (ESBD)
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter complete sphincterotomy, a 3-cm long 15mm diameter CRE balloon is passed over a guidewire across the lower end of common bile duct. The contrast filled balloon is inflated to the size of the bile duct for around 30 seconds until waisting is abolished.
Interventions
Refer to description under arms
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients at least 18 years old, presented to Prince of Wales Hospital for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for known or suspected bile duct stones are invited to participate.
- Informed consent will be obtained before the beginning of ERCP.
- Patients are randomized to EST or ESBD after confirming the presence of bile duct stones on the initial cholangiogram
You may not qualify if:
- septic shock, coagulopathy (international normalized ratio \>1.3,
- partial thromboplastin time greater than twice that of control),
- platelet count \<50,000x103/uL or
- ampullary tumors
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Endoscopy Center, Prince of Wales Hospital
Hong Kong, China
Related Publications (1)
Teoh AYB, Cheung FKY, Hu B, Pan YM, Lai LH, Chiu PWY, Wong SKH, Chan FKL, Lau JYW. Randomized trial of endoscopic sphincterotomy with balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy alone for removal of bile duct stones. Gastroenterology. 2013 Feb;144(2):341-345.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.10.027. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
PMID: 23085096DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Frances KY Cheung, MBChB
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 11, 2005
First Posted
September 14, 2005
Study Start
September 1, 2005
Primary Completion
September 1, 2011
Last Updated
February 17, 2012
Record last verified: 2010-09