Immediate Treatment vs Colposcopic Follow-up for Biopsy-Proven CIN 1
Randomized Trial of Immediate Treatment vs. Colposcopic Follow-up for Biopsy-Proven CIN 1
1 other identifier
interventional
415
2 countries
10
Brief Summary
This study looks at immediate treatment of a cervix with CIN 1 versus regular six-month follow-up with colposcopy and treatment if CIN 1 progresses.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Nov 2000
Longer than P75 for phase_3
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2000
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 8, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 12, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2007
CompletedJanuary 29, 2009
January 1, 2009
6.8 years
September 8, 2005
January 28, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
progression to more advanced disease
18 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
persistent CIN 1 after 18 months
18 months
bleeding.
18 months
predict disease persistence or progression
18 months
Study Arms (2)
1
EXPERIMENTALImmediate Treatment - LEEP - Loop electrosurgical excision procedure
2
NO INTERVENTIONColposcopic Follow-up
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Eligible patients will:
- have documented CIN 1 by histologic assessment as the highest grade lesion present,
- have the lesion confined to the cervix and completely visualized,
- be 16 years or older.
You may not qualify if:
- any one of the following will be an excluding characteristic:
- index Pap smear showing CIN 2, CIN 3 or cancer;
- index Pap smear shows atypical glandular cells of unknown significance, glandular dysplasia, or malignancy requiring immediate investigation;
- patients with previously identified CIN 1 by biopsy who are already in a colposcopic surveillance program;
- unsatisfactory colposcopic exam defined as inability to see the extent of the lesion in the endocervical canal or absence of a lesion on the ectocervix but endocervical curettage shows CIN 1;
- pregnancy;
- prior therapy for dysplasia including medical (5FU), surgical (Laser, LEEP) or cryotherapy;
- prior gynecologic cancer;
- prior pelvic radiation therapy;
- inability to attend outpatient follow-up visits because of geographic inaccessibility;
- other malignancies except non-melanoma skin cancer;
- immunosuppression due to diseases such as AIDS, organ transplantation, or on immunosuppressive medications such as prednisone, imuran or chemotherapy for diseases like systemic lupus;
- cognitively impaired or otherwise unable to obtain written informed consent;
- extension of the CIN 1 lesion to vagina or a separate vaginal lesion showing dysplasia;
- colposcopically visible condyloma outside of the transformation zone;
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (10)
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Campinas, CEP 13083-970, Brazil
Instituto Fernandes Figueira - Oswaldo Cruz Foundation
Rio de Janeiro, CEP 22250-020, Brazil
B.C. Cancer Agency
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E6, Canada
Nova Scotia Cancer Centre
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 1V7, Canada
Brantford General Hospital
Brantford, Ontario, N3T 3J2, Canada
Hamilton Health Sciences - Henderson Site
Hamilton, Ontario, L8P 3A9, Canada
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, N6A 4G5, Canada
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8, Canada
Hôpital du Saint-Sacrement
Québec, Quebec, G1S 2L6, Canada
University of Saskatchewan
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7K 3H3, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Laurie Elit, MD
Juravinski Cancer Centre
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mark Levine, MD
Ontario Clinical Oncology Group (OCOG)
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jim Julian, MMath
McMaster University, Dept of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 8, 2005
First Posted
September 12, 2005
Study Start
November 1, 2000
Primary Completion
September 1, 2007
Study Completion
September 1, 2007
Last Updated
January 29, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-01