Effect of Different Hemodialysis Modality on Adiponectin,Vascular Function and Clinical Prognosis
The Impact of Conventional Hemodialysis, High Flux Hemodialysis and Hemodiafiltration on Adiponectin, Vascular Function and Clinical Prognosis
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Adiponectin, an adipose tissue derived protein, with anti-inflammatory properties that is secreted from adipose tissue, is associated with insulin resistance. It has been shown to be a predictor of cardiovascular events in both the general population and patients undergoing hemodialysis. Adiponectin levels were inversely related to body mass index values, plasma leptin levels, insulin levels, serum triglyceride levels, and homeostatic model assessment index values. In addition to it's ability in increasing insulin sensitivity, adiponectin was demonstrated to have anti-inflammatory and anti-atherogenic properties. In patients with ESRD, renal replacement method was either peritoneal dialysis or HD. High efficient dialysis methods such as high flux HD and HDF had been used more and more popularly. High flux HD and HDF have the advantages in middle to large molecule removal, and better hemodynamic stability. Better clinical prognosis has been shown in patients undergoing high flux HD or HDF. Although studies have demonstrated that the plasma adiponectin levels were elevated in patients receiving HD, whether different dialysis modality will interfere the plasma adiponectin levels and patients' prognosis remain unknown. The current project is planned to investigate the effects of different HD modality on the plasma adiponectin levels and its correlation other serum inflammatory markers and vascular function. Patients' long term prognosis will also be assessed in the present study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 8, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 12, 2005
CompletedDecember 20, 2005
June 1, 2005
September 8, 2005
December 19, 2005
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Adiponectin and inflammatory cytokines level
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Cardiovascular event
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis on ESRD under regular maintenance hemodialysis, no active infection, no allergy to chosen AK, informed consent acquired
You may not qualify if:
- Not ESRD, temporary HD, active infection, during admission, allergy to chosen AK, without informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin Branch
Douliu, Taiwan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Kwan-Dun Wu, MD, PhD
National Taiwan University Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pei-Lun Chu, MD, MMS
National Taiwan University Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 8, 2005
First Posted
September 12, 2005
Study Start
September 1, 2004
Last Updated
December 20, 2005
Record last verified: 2005-06