Combination of Telmisartan 40 mg Plus Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg vs. Telmisartan 40 mg Alone in Patients With Essential Hypertension Who Fail to Respond Adequately to Telmisartan Monotherapy
A Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing a Fixed Dose Combination of Telmisartan 40 mg Plus Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg to Telmisartan 40 mg in Patients Who Fail to Respond Adequately to Treatment With Telmisartan 40 mg
1 other identifier
interventional
218
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The objective of this trial is to demonstrate that the fixed dose combination of telmisartan 40 mg and HCTZ 12.5 mg is superior to the monocomponent of telmisartan (Micardis, Gliosartan, Kinzal, Kinzalmono, Predxal, Pritor, Samertan, Telmisartan) 40 mg in patients with essential hypertension who fail to respond adequately to telmisartan monotherapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3 hypertension
Started Jan 2005
Shorter than P25 for phase_3 hypertension
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2005
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 2, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 5, 2005
CompletedNovember 5, 2013
November 1, 2013
7 months
September 2, 2005
November 4, 2013
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in mean seated trough DBP after eight weeks of the double-blind treatment period
after 8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Change in seated trough SBP
after 8 weeks
Seated DBP control rate (seated trough DBP < 90 mmHg)
after 8 weeks
Seated DBP response rate V2 (seated trough DBP < 90 mmHg and/or reduction from pseudo-baseline in seated trough DBP ≥ 10 mmHg)
after 8 weeks
Seated DBP response rate V3 (seated trough DBP < 90 mmHg and/or reduction from pseudo-baseline in seated trough DBP ≥ 10 mmHg)
after 8 weeks
Seated SBP response rate V2 (seated trough SBP < 140 mmHg and/or reduction from pseudo-baseline in seated trough SBP ≥ 10 mmHg)
after 8 weeks
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Essential hypertensive patients who meet all the criteria as follows:
- Mean seated DBP must be \>= 95 and \<= 114 mmHg at Visit 2
- Mean seated SBP must be \>= 140 and \<= 200 mmHg at Visit 2
- Mean seated DBP must be \>= 90 and \<= 114 mmHg at Visit 3
- Mean seated SBP must be \<= 200 mmHg at Visit 3
You may not qualify if:
- Patients taking 4 or more anti-hypertensive medications at Visit 1
- Patients with known or suspected secondary hypertension (renovascular hypertension, primary aldosteronism, pheochromocytoma, etc.)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0003, Japan
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 163-6003, Japan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Boehringer Ingelheim Study Coordinator
Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 2, 2005
First Posted
September 5, 2005
Study Start
January 1, 2005
Primary Completion
August 1, 2005
Study Completion
August 1, 2005
Last Updated
November 5, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-11