A Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Trial of Risperidone for the Treatment of Anorexia Nervosa
2 other identifiers
interventional
41
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this pilot study is to determine the safety and efficacy of risperidone for the treatment of anorexia nervosa. Hypothesis 1: Subjects on risperidone will show a more significant decrease in body image distortion and Eating Disorder Inventory -2 scores than subjects on placebo. Hypothesis 2: Subjects on risperidone will reach and maintain at or above 90% Ideal body weight sooner than controls.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Aug 2004
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 31, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 1, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 2, 2016
CompletedFebruary 2, 2016
December 1, 2015
5.3 years
August 31, 2005
June 8, 2015
December 29, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Change in Eating Disorder Inventory-2 Drive for Thinness Subscale (DT)
Eating Disorder Inventory -2 - Subscale : Drive for Thinness Subscale (DT). Lower scores are better on this scale and indicate less cognitive focus on drive for thinness. The EDI 2 is a 91 item scale with 8 subscales - (Drive for thinness, Bulimia, body dissatisfaction, ineffectiveness, perfection, interpersonal distrust, interoceptive awareness and maturity fears.). The DT subscale was used for this outcome. Respondents rate each item as "usually , often, sometimes, rarely or never". Subscale scores are computed by summing all item scores for each subscale. There are 7 items in the DT subscale (questions 1,7,11,16,25,32 and 49). the subscale score range is 0-21. The EDI-2 was completed by subjects at baseline and then monthly during study participation (range 0 -18 weeks). Change in the DT subscale score was calculated using an estimate of change in score between week 0 and week 7 derived from the mixed effect model across all time points.
month
Change in Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI)-2 Score for Body Dissatisfaction (BD)
change in Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI) 2-score for Body Dissatisfaction (BD). Lower scores are better on this scale. Higher scores indicate the subject has greater body dissatisfaction. BD is one of the 8 subscales of the EDI-2. 9 of the 91 questions in the EDI-2 scale constitute this subscale. The score range is 0-27. Subjects completed the EDI-2 at baseline and monthly during study participation (range 0 to 18 weeks). Change in the BD subscale score during the study was calculated using an estimate of change in score between week 0 and week 7 derived from the mixed effect model across all time points.
monthly
Hazard Ratio for Time to Reaching Ease Of Eating Level 3 From Start of Study (Normal Eating Behavior)
The Ease of Eating Scale (EOES) is a 14 item scale which measures Food avoidance behaviors (FABs). The scale is rated by staff observing a subject eating a meal or snack. 0 = normal eating behavior, maximum score 28. Higher scores indicate more food avoidance behaviors, such as taking small bites, taking \> 30 seconds between bites (slow eating), etc. EOE was completed for each meal a subject ate in the program and scores were averaged for each week in the study and entered in the data base. Change in EOES score was calculated by evaluating change over time. This measure was only used in Phase 1 of the study, for days the subjects were in the treatment program.
weekly up to study endpoint: reaching target weight and maintaining for 1 month
Color A Person Test (CAPT)
Color A Person Test (CAPT) - Subjects color an outlined image of a body to indicate body dissatisfaction (red (5)= very dissatisfied, Yellow, dissatisfied, black, neutral, green satisfied, blue very satisfied (1). The outline is divided into16 sections for scoring. The CAPT was completed at baseline and monthly during study participation. Total CAPT scores were calculated by adding the total score and dividing by 16. Score range is 1-5. Lower scores indicate less body dissatisfaction. Change in the CAPT score during the study was calculated using an estimate of change in score between week 0 and week 7 derived from the mixed effect model across all time points.
monthly
Body Image Software (BIS): Average Distortion
Body Image Software (BIS) - the subject adjusts a digital image of themselves on the computer using the direction to "adjust their image to how they see themselves right now", this determines their perception of their current image. Accuracy is measured by a smaller score between desired image and actual image. Change in the BIS Average Distortion score during the study was calculated using an estimate of change in score between week 0 and week 7 derived from the mixed effect model across all time points. There are no identifiable minimum/maximum values as there would be in a questionnaire scale. There are no subscales. The BIS program calculates the difference between their actual image and the size of the image they have adjusted the digital image to based on their perception of "how they see themselves right now"
monthly
Body Image Software (BIS): Average Desired Thinness
Body Image Software (BIS) - the subject adjusts a digital image of themselves on the computer to "their desired image". The BIS program calculates the difference between their actual image, and how much they have adjusted the image to represent their "desired image". Accuracy is measured by a smaller score between desired image and actual image. Change in BIS - Average Desired Thinness score was calculated using an estimate of change in score between week 0 and week 7 derived from the mixed effect model across all time points. There are no identifiable minimum/maximum values as there would be in a questionnaire scale. . There are no subscales.
monthly
Body Image Software (BIS) - Point of Subjective Equality (PSE)
Body Image Software (BIS) - the subject adjusts a digital image of themselves on the computer to their desired image, and also completes a task that determines their perception of their current image. Accuracy is measured by a smaller score between desired image and actual image. Change in BIS -PSE was calculated using an estimate of change in score between week 0 and week 7 derived from the mixed effect model across all time points. There are no identifiable minimum/maximum values as there would be in a questionnaire scale. Interpreting the PSE is how it compares to a PSE = 0, which is no distortion in body size.
monthly
Body Image Software (BIS) - Difference Limen (DL)
Body Image Software (BIS) - the subject adjusts a digital image of themselves on the computer to their desired image, and also completes a task that determines their perception of their current image. Accuracy is measured by a smaller score between desired image and actual image. Change in BIS-DL was calculated using an estimate of change in score between week 0 and week 7 derived from the mixed effect model across all time points. There are no identifiable minimum/maximum values as there would be in a questionnaire scale. There are no subscales. Interpreting the DL occurs by referencing it to DL= 0, which would reflect a total inability to detect size differences, which has never occurred in studies using the BIS program.
monthly
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Time to Reach 90% Ideal Body Weight (IBW) and Maintain for 1 Month, Stratified by >=80% at Start of Study
weekly
Change in Ratings of Anxiety Symptoms on the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC)
monthly to study end point
Change in Leptin Levels
Week 0 and week 7
Change in Prolactin Levels
week 0 and week 7
Time to Reach 90% IBW and Maintain for 1 Month, Stratified by IBW <80% at Start of Study
0 - 18 weeks
Study Arms (2)
placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORdouble blind study of risperidone for anorexia nervosa. this is the subject group that receives placebo.
risperidone
ACTIVE COMPARATORStudy is double blind, placebo controlled. This is the subject group on active medication
Interventions
risperidone titrated 0.5 to 4 mg over study enrollment. Mean Length of Phase 1 is currently 10 weeks.
Comparison of risperidone versus placebo for the treatment of symptoms related to anorexia nervosa.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Primary Diagnosis of Anorexia Nervosa
- Female, age 12-21
- Active in a level of care for AN at The Children's Hospital, Denver
- As long as there is a primary dx of AN, co-morbid diagnoses may be included.
- If taking an antidepressant, must be on a stable dose for 3 weeks prior to entering the study, and dose of antidepressant may not be changed during Phase 1 of the study.
- If choosing to discontinue antidepressant medication, must be off the medication for 3 weeks prior to beginning the study.
- If sexually active, must use birth control during the study and have a monthly pregnancy test.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous enrollment in this study on a prior admission
- Previous allergic reaction to risperidone or other atypical neuroleptic
- Positive pregnancy test
- Neurologic disorder other than benign essential tremor
- Taking a psychotropic medication other than antidepressant and discontinuing the medication is not recommended.
- Active hepatic or renal disease
- Wards of the state
- Males
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Colorado, Denverlead
- Janssen Pharmaceuticalscollaborator
- National Center for Research Resources (NCRR)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
The Children's Hospital
Denver, Colorado, 80218, United States
Related Publications (1)
Hagman J, Gralla J, Sigel E, Ellert S, Dodge M, Gardner R, O'Lonergan T, Frank G, Wamboldt MZ. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of risperidone for the treatment of adolescents and young adults with anorexia nervosa: a pilot study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011 Sep;50(9):915-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2011.06.009. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
PMID: 21871373DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jennifer Hagman MD
- Organization
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Childrens Hospital Colorado
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jennifer O Hagman, MD
University of Colorado, Health Sciences Center and The Children's Hospital, Denver
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 31, 2005
First Posted
September 1, 2005
Study Start
August 1, 2004
Primary Completion
December 1, 2009
Study Completion
December 1, 2009
Last Updated
February 2, 2016
Results First Posted
February 2, 2016
Record last verified: 2015-12