Mouth Care Regimes During Radiotherapy
A Pilot Randomised Comparison of Bicarbonate Based Mouth Care Versus Biotene Based Mouth Care During Radiotherapy
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess whether Biotene oral care products have a benefit in the treatment of xerostomia and mucositis when compared with conventional bicarbonate mouth care regimes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Nov 1999
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 1999
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2003
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 29, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 30, 2005
CompletedDecember 15, 2005
May 1, 1998
August 29, 2005
December 14, 2005
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Mid treatment, 2 and 6 weeks post treatment relative to baseline: Oral comfort - dichotomised as difficulty yes/no based on 3 questions
Mucositis - dichotomised
Xerostomia - dichotomised
Pain medications - dichotomised
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Oral flora
Oral pH
Salivary flow
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Are undergoing oral or pharyngeal irradiation with a cumulative dose \> 35Gy with at least 1/2 of the salivary tissue contained within the field of treatment.
- May or may not have undergone surgery.
- Are available for follow-up questionnaires.
- Are English speaking or have an easily accessible interpreter.
You may not qualify if:
- No co-morbidities which may result in dry mouth, for example Sjögren syndrome.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
St George Hospital, Cancer Care Centre
Sydney, New South Wales, 2217, Australia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Associate Professor Peter H Graham
St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 29, 2005
First Posted
August 30, 2005
Study Start
November 1, 1999
Study Completion
March 1, 2003
Last Updated
December 15, 2005
Record last verified: 1998-05