Treatment and Diagnosis of Plague
Safety and Efficacy of Gentamicin Versus Streptomycin for the Treatment of Naturally Occurring Human Plague and Evaluation of Rapid Diagnostic Test Kits for Yersinia Pestis
1 other identifier
interventional
114
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This clinical trial will compare the effectiveness of streptomycin, which historically is the standard drug for treatment of plague, with gentamicin. The hypothesis is that gentamicin is not inferior to streptomycin but that it will have less severe side effects. The study is being done in Madagascar because that country reports the most plague cases in the world. Patients coming into a participating clinic with suspected plague (bubonic, pneumonic, or septicemic) will be randomized into one of two treatment arms after giving informed consent. Patients will be monitored for side effects and for improvement of symptoms. In addition, rapid diagnostic test strips have been developed but not fully evaluated for use on humans. The investigators will evaluate these new tests on specimens from the same patients, comparing their performance with that of classical diagnostic methods such as culture and serology.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Aug 2004
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 9, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 10, 2005
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2007
CompletedFebruary 26, 2009
February 1, 2009
August 9, 2005
February 24, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Survival or death at 2 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Time to defervescence during treatment
Number and severity of adverse effects at 2 weeks
Complications at 2 weeks
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age or older.
- Patients must have had potential exposure to rodents and/or their fleas or contact with a known plague case.
- Patients must have a fever of at least 38 °C that developed rapidly, and have one of the following:
- One or more buboes (defined as tender lymph node swelling \>=1 cm) that appeared after or at the same time as the fever; or
- Clinical suspicion of pneumonic plague (prostration, cough, increased respiratory rate, hemoptysis and/or purulent sputum); or
- Clinical suspicion of plague AND an epidemiological link with other cases.
- Only patients that are later confirmed by standard diagnostic tests will be included in the final analysis. Patients who do not have plague confirmed by standard tests will still be included in the safety analysis.
You may not qualify if:
- Has signs fitting plague meningitis (severely ill patient with signs of plague and one or more of the following: headache, fever, sensorial disturbances, neck and back stiffness, and/or positive Kernig and Brudzinski signs).
- Has hypotension unresponsive to fluid therapy (i.e. shock). In adults hypotension is defined as systolic blood pressure \< 80 mmHg and heart rate \> 110/min; in children it will need to be diagnosed by attending physician or medical officer.
- Has an "illness severity score" of 16 or higher (see Patient Record)
- Has a known allergy to gentamicin, streptomycin, or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
- Is receiving dialysis for renal failure
- Has other severe underlying disease such as hepatic failure or other severe organ failure
- Has taken tetracyclines, quinolones, gentamicin, streptomycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, or chloramphenicol in the last 24 hours. If the patient has taken medications that are not known, he/she will still be enrolled.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Centers for Disease Control and Preventionlead
- Food and Drug Administration (FDA)collaborator
- Ministry of Health, Madagascarcollaborator
- Ministry of Health, Ugandacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Ministry of Health
Antananarivo, Antananarivo, Madagascar
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kevin Griffith, MD, MPH
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Martin Schriefer, PhD
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 9, 2005
First Posted
August 10, 2005
Study Start
August 1, 2004
Study Completion
February 1, 2007
Last Updated
February 26, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-02